The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Badalyan V.A.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Posessor A.D.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Stepanyan Z.M.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Zakharova A.I.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Levonian E.A.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Measuring methods of volumetric changes of soft tissues at dental implants site and tooth recessions site

Authors:

Badalyan V.A., Posessor A.D., Stepanyan Z.M., Zakharova A.I., Levonian E.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2023;102(6‑2): 51‑54

Read: 865 times


To cite this article:

Badalyan VA, Posessor AD, Stepanyan ZM, Zakharova AI, Levonian EA. Measuring methods of volumetric changes of soft tissues at dental implants site and tooth recessions site. Stomatology. 2023;102(6‑2):51‑54. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202310206251

Recommended articles:

References:

  1. Ashurko IP, Tarasenko SV, Esayan AV, Galyas AI, Li AV. Evaluation of free connective tissue graft and collagen matrix clinical effectiveness to increase soft tissue thickness around dental implants. Parodontologiya. 2022;27(2):117-125. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2022-27-2-117-125
  2. Tavelli L, Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Vera Rodriguez M, Mancini L, Meneghetti PC, Mendonça G, Wang HL. Early soft tissue changes following implant placement with or without soft tissue augmentation using a xenogeneic cross-link collagen scaffold: A volumetric comparative study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(1):181-187. Epub 2021 Dec 22. PMID: 34936177. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12856
  3. Stefanini M, et al. An exploratory clinical study evaluating safety and performance of a volume-stable collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap for single gingival recession treatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:9:3181-3191.
  4. Zucchelli G, et al. Classification of facial peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiencies at single implant sites in the esthetic zone. J Periodontol. 2019; 90:10:1116-1124.
  5. Kloukos D, Koukos G, Gkantidis N, Sculean A, Katsaros C, Stavropoulos A. Transgingival probing: a clinical gold standard for assessing gingival thickness. Quintessence Int. 2021;0(0):394-401. PMID: 33533238. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b937015
  6. Fons-Badal C, et al. A novel, fully digital approach to quantifying volume gain after soft tissue graft surgery. A pilot study. J Clin Periodontol. 2020; 47:5:614-620. 
  7. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Avila-Ortiz G, Urban IA et al. Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri- implant health: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Periodontol. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.200259.2020.
  8. Mandelaris GA, et al. American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence Consensus Statement on Selected Oral Applications for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. J Periodontol. 2017;88:10:939-945. 
  9. Mendes S, et al. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnostic purposes in operative dentistry-a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 24:2:547-557. 
  10. Bhaskar V, et al. Updates on ultrasound research in implant dentistry: a systematic review of potential clinical indications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018; 47:6:20180076.
  11. Tavelli L, et al. Ultrasonographic tissue perfusion analysis at implant and palatal donor sites following soft tissue augmentation: A clinical pilot study. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48:4:602-614. 
  12. Barootchi S, et al. Ultrasonographic characterization of lingual structures pertinent to oral, periodontal, and implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31:4:352-359. 
  13. Chan H-L, Kripfgans OD. Ultrasonography for diagnosis of peri-implant diseases and conditions: a detailed scanning protocol and case demonstration. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020;49:7:20190445.
  14. Tattan M, et al. Ultrasonography for chairside evaluation of periodontal structures: A pilot study. J Periodontol. 2020;91:7:890-899. 
  15. Culjat MO, et al. Ultrasound imaging of dental implants. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:456-459. 
  16. Eghbali A, et al. Ultrasonic Assessment of Mucosal Thickness around Implants: Validity, Reproducibility, and Stability of Connective Tissue Grafts at the Buccal Aspect. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18:1:51-61. 
  17. Lee J-S, et al. Digital scanning is more accurate than using a periodontal probe to measure the keratinized tissue width. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1:3665.
  18. Tavelli L, et al. Volumetric changes at implant sites: A systematic appraisal of traditional methods and optical scanning-based digital technologies. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48:2:315-334. 
  19. Mennito AS, et al. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31:4:369-377. 
  20. Bosniac P, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Comparison of an indirect impression scanning system and two direct intraoral scanning systems in vivo. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:5:2421-2427.
  21. Couso-Queiruga E, Raabe C, Belser UC, Buser D, Avila-Ortiz G, Rodrigues DM, Chappuis V. Non-invasive assessment of peri-implant mucosal thickness: A cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2023 Jun 18. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37332251. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.23-0102
  22. Keul C, Güth J-F. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:2:735-745. 
  23. Resende CCD, et al. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125:2:294-299. 
  24. Schmidt A, et al. Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update. J Clin Med. 2020;9:3:E688.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.