Use of dental implants in orthopedic rehabilitation of patients in aesthetically important area

Close metadata

The article presents a review of scientific data of Russian and non-Russian works dedicated to the problem of instant dental implantation in the aesthetically important areas, i.e. the upper jaw. The paper considers such anatomical factors of unsatisfactory aesthetic treatment results as presence and thickness of vestibular alveola wall, pathophysiological processes occurring while extracting teeth in this area, presence of odontogenic inflammatory sites and traumatic injuries under root canal and orthopaedic treatment, impact of gum’s biotype on the condition of soft tissue in the area of the future orthopaedic prothesis. Data used in the article suggests the necessity of thorough diagnostic with the help of up-to-date technologies such as Cone beam computer tomography (CBCT).

Keywords:

immediate dental implantation

the facial bone wall of the extraction socket

the biotype of the gum

Authors:

Losev F.F.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

SPIN RSCI: 5140-7140
ORCID: 0000-0002-9448-9614

Brailovskaya T.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

ORCID: 0000-0003-0407-0885

Kalinin R.V.

North-West branch of Forensic Expert Center of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation

ORCID: 0000-0001-5863-0564

Received:

11.02.2021

Accepted:

09.03.2021

List of references:

Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome Evaluation of Early Placed Maxillary Anterior Single-Tooth Implants Using Objective Esthetic Criteria: A Cross-Sectional, Retrospective Study in 45 Patients With a 2- to 4-Year Follow-Up Using Pink and White Esthetic Scores. J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):140-151. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080435
Botticelli D, Renzi A, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Implants in fresh extraction sockets: Prospective 5-years follow-up clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:1226-1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01620.x
Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, Buser D. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall — a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Periodont Restorative Dent. 2011;31(2):125-131.
Buser D, Chappius V, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Frei M, Belser UC. Long-Term Stability of Contour Augmentation With Early Implant Placement Following Single Tooth Extraction in the Esthetic Zone: A Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study in 41 Patients With a 5- to 9-Year Follow-Up. J Periodontol. 2013;84(11):1517-1527. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2013.120635
Mangano FG, Mangano C, Ricci M, Sammons RL, Shibli JA, Piattelli A. Single-tooth Morse taper connection implants placed in fresh extraction sockets of the anterior maxilla: an aesthetic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(11):1302-1307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02307.x
Zhang W, Skrypczak A, Weltman R. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning. BMC Oral Health. 2015;10(15):65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0055-1
Chen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(suppl):186-217.
Ghassemian M, Nowzari H, Lajolo C, Verdugo F, Pirronti TD, Addona A. The Thickness of Facial Alveolar Bone Overlying Healthy Maxillary Anterior Teeth. J Periodontol. 2012;83(2):187-197. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110172
Araújo MG, da Silva JCC, de Mendonça AF, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):407-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12366
Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(2):212-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.2005.00642.x
Tan WL, Wong TLT, Wong MCM, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(suppl 5):1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.x
Rodriguez AM, Rosenstiel SF. Esthetic considerations related to bone and soft tissue maintenance and development around dental implants: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the American Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;108:259-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60174-7
Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(1):73-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01413.x
Shah R, Thomas R, Mehta DS. Recent modifications of free gingival graft. A case series. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6(3):425-427. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237x.161910
Zweers J, Thomas RZ, Slot DE, Weisgold AS, Van der Weijden FGA. Characteristics of periodontal biotype, its dimensions, associations and prevalence: a systematic review. J Cl Periodontol. 2014;41(10):958-971. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12275
Chappuis V, Engel O, Reyes M, Shahim K, Nolte LP, Buser D. Ridge Alterations Postextraction in the Esthetic Zone. Dent Res. 2013;92(12 suppl): 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022034513506713
Frost NA, Mealey BL, Jones AA, Huynh-Ba G. Periodontal Biotype: Gingival Thickness as It Relates to Probe Visibility and Buccal Plate Thickness. J Periodontol. 2015;86(10):1141-1149. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.140394
Shah R, Sowmya NK, Mehta DS. Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to clinical parameters. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6(suppl 1):167-171, 280. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.143218
Joshi V, Gupta S. Immediate Implant Placement in Anterior Aesthetic Region and Assessment using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scan Technology. J In Oral Health. 2015;7(suppl 2):99-102.
Fuentes R, Flores T, Navarro P, Salamanca C, Beltrán V, Borie E. Assessment of buccal bone thickness of aesthetic maxillary region: a conebeam computed tomography study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2015;45(5):162-168. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2015.45.5.162
Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113(6):817-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.005
Vera C, De Kok IJ, Reinhold D, Limpiphipatanakorn P, Yap AK, Tyndall D, Cooper LF. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(6):1514-1519.
Huynh-Ba G, Pjetursson BE, Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Ferrus J, Lindhe J, et al. Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(1): 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01870.x
Nowzari H, Molayem S, Chiu CH, Rich SK. Cone-beam computed tomographic measurement of maxillary central incisors to determine prevalence of facial alveolar bone width ≥2 mm. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14(4):595-602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00287.x
Wang HM, Shen JW, Yu MF, Chen XY, Jiang QH, He FM. Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(50):1123-1129. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3348
Januário AL, Barriviera M, Duarte WR. Soft Tissue Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Novel Method for the Measurement of Gingival Tissue and the Dimensions of the Dentogingival Unit. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008; 20(6):366-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00210.x
Park JB, Mangano FG, Luongo F, Picciocchi G, Mortellaro C, Mangano C. Soft tissue stability around single implants inserted to replace maxillary lateral incisors: a 3D evaluation. Int Jf Dentistry. 2016;4:9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9393219
Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:552-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01388.x
Schwartz-Arad D. Ridge preservation and immediate implantation. Quintessence Publishing. 2012;1:131
Lindeboom JA, Tjiook Y, Kroon FH. Immediate placement of implants in periapical infected sites: a prospective randomized study in 50 patients. Oral Surg Ora Med Oral Patho. Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101(6):705-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.08.022
Cortellini P, Graziani F, Tonetti MS, Cairo F, Lang NP, Abundo R, Conforti GP, Marquardt S, Rasperini G, Silvestri M, Wallkamm B, Wetzel A. Immediate versus delayed implant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(2):215-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12666
Roe P, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Zimmerman G, Mesquida J. Horizontal and vertical dimensional changes of peri-implant facial bone following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 1-year cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(2):393-400.
Vera C, De Kok IJ, Chen W, Reside G, Tyndall D, Cooper LF. Evaluation of post-implant buccal bone resorption using cone beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(5):1249-1257.
Jun-Beom Park. Immediate Placement of Dental Implants into Fresh Extraction Socket in the Maxillary Anterior Region: A Case Report. J Oral Implantol. 2010;36(2):153-157. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00045
Chen ST, Darby I. The relationship between facial bone wall defects and dimensional alterations of the ridge following flapless tooth extraction in the anterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(8):931-937. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12899
Morton D, Chen ST, Martin WC, Levine RA, Buser D. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding optimizing esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 (suppl):216-220. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2013.g3

Close metadata