The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Kodzaeva Z.S.

RUDN University, restorative dentistry department, Moscow, Russia

Turkina A.Iu.

Pervyĭ Moskovskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ meditsinskiĭ universitet im. I.M. Sechenova

Doroshina V.Iu.

Kafedra terapevticheskoĭ stomatologii GBOU VPO Pervogo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova Minzdrava Rossii

The long-term results of teeth restoration with composite resin materials: a systematic literature review

Authors:

Kodzaeva Z.S., Turkina A.Iu., Doroshina V.Iu.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2019;98(3): 117‑122

DOI: 10.17116/stomat201998031117

Read: 2751 times

Contact the author
Table of contents

THE LONG-TERM RESULTS OF TEETH RESTORATION WITH COMPOSITE RESIN MATERIALS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
THE LONG-TERM RESULTS OF TEETH RESTORATION WITH COMPOSITE RESIN MATERIALS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

To cite this article:

Kodzaeva ZS, Turkina AIu, Doroshina VIu. The long-term results of teeth restoration with composite resin materials: a systematic literature review. Stomatology. 2019;98(3):117‑122. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201998031117

Подписка 2026 Стоматология (Stomatology)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Long-term resu­lts of simu­ltaneous caro­tid enda­rterectomy and coro­nary artery bypass grafting: predictors of cardiac events and mortality. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(6):657-665
Prognostic mode­ling of long-term outcomes after mini­mally inva­sive lumbar fusion based on complex clinical, radiological and neuroimaging analysis in employees of JSC «Russian Railways». Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2026;(2):44-53
Abstract:

Aim — evaluate by means of a systematic review the survival rate of composite resin restorations in the long-term period and the main factors, affecting the quality of restorations. Materials and methods. An electronic search was performed in eLIBRARY.RU, PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus. Restriction period was 2007—2017 years. The eligibility criteria included randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies with at least 3 years of follow-up. Results. The initial search resulted in 328 articles after an initial assessment and careful reading, 17 studies were included in this review. The overall survival rate of composite restorations was 90.7% after 3 years, 89.5% after 5 years, 89.3% after 7 years and 75.6% after 10 years. The highest loss rate was for class II restorations at molars. However there was not enough information about class III and IV restorations and direct veneers. According to majority of publications, type of composite resin material and adhesive system do not affect the survival rate of restorations. The main risk factors of failure are smoking, beverages consumption, bruxism, xerostomia and low level of caries resistance. Conclusion. The results of this review suggest that composite resin restorations can demonstrate clinically acceptable results in the long-term period. In case of compliance with treatment protocol the longevity of composite resin restoration is more than 15 years.

Authors:

Kodzaeva Z.S.

RUDN University, restorative dentistry department, Moscow, Russia

Turkina A.Iu.

Pervyĭ Moskovskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ meditsinskiĭ universitet im. I.M. Sechenova

Doroshina V.Iu.

Kafedra terapevticheskoĭ stomatologii GBOU VPO Pervogo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova Minzdrava Rossii

Close metadata

References:

  1. Gazhva SI, Agafonova GV. Development of the Guarantee period and quality assesment criteria for direct esthetic teeth restoration. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya. 2009;3(51):52-55. (In Russ.)
  2. Komarova KV, Polenichkin VK, Ratkina NN. Comparative assessment of marginal adjoining of fillings and dental inlays in patients with xerostomia. Kazanskij medicinskij zhurnal. 2012;93:5:757-759. (In Russ.)
  3. Mitronin AV, Chunikhin AA, Abaev ZM, Basova AA, Grishin SYu, Primerova VS, Savina NP. Application composite material on silorane basis in regenerative therapy of teeth of chewing group. Cathedra. 2014;49:32-36. (In Russ.)
  4. Chilikin VN, Grineva TV, Sotnikova NP. Comparative analysis of composite filling materials with different dispersity of the filling. Dental Clinic. 2008;4:4-6. (In Russ.)
  5. Akimoto N, Takamizu M, Momoi Y. 10-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive system. Oper Dent. 2007;32(1):3-10. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-46
  6. Al Khuraif AA. An in vitro evaluation of wear and surface roughness of particulate filler composite resin after tooth brushing. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72(8):977-983. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.933251
  7. Alonso V, Darriba IL, Caserío M. Retrospective evaluation of posterior composite resin sandwich restorations with Herculite XRV: 18-year findings. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(2):93-101. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a37386
  8. Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Donassollo TA, Cenci MS, Loguércio AD, Moraes RR, Bronkhorst EM, Opdam NJ, Demarco FF. 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater. 2011;27(10):955-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.06.001
  9. Da Silva EM, de Sá Rodrigues CU, Dias DA, da Silva S, Amaral CM, Guimarães JG. Effect of toothbrushing-mouthrinse-cycling on surface roughness and topography of nanofilled, microfilled, and microhybrid resin composites. Oper Dent. 2014;39(5):521-529. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-199-L
  10. De Andrade AK, Duarte RM, Medeiros e Silva FD, Batista AU, Lima KC, Pontual ML, Montes MA. Resin composite class I restorations: a 54-month randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2014;39(6):588-594. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-067-C
  11. De Oliveira AL, Botta AC, Campos JÁ, Garcia PP. Effects of immersion media and repolishing on color stability and superficial morphology of nanofilled composite resin. Microsc Microanal. 2014;20(4):1234-1239. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927614001299
  12. Dietz W, Montag R, Kraft U, Walther M, Sigusch BW, Gaengler P. Longitudinal micromorphological 15-year results of posterior composite restorations using three-dimensional scanning electron microscopy. J Dent. 2014;42(8):959-969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.013
  13. Ferracane JL. Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can’t predict? Dent Mater. 2013;29(1):51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.013
  14. Gomes IA, Mendes HG, Filho EMM, de Rizzi CC, Nina MG, Turssi CP, Vasconcelos AJ, Bandeca MC, de Jesus Tavarez RR. Effect of Dental Prophylaxis Techniques on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(1):37-41. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2208
  15. Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Blaser PK, Mondragon E, Mjör IA. A long-term evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of resin-based composite restorations: results of a seven-year study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(12):1476-1484. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0098
  16. Hurst D. Amalgam or composite fillings — which material lasts longer? Evid Based Dent. 2014;15(2):50-51. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401026
  17. Kimyai S, Mohammadi N, Alizadeh Oskoee P, Pournaghi-Azar F, Ebrahimi Chaharom ME, Amini M. Effect of different prophylaxis methods on microleakage of micro filled composite restorations. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2012;6(2):65-69. https://doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2012.014
  18. Lempel E, Lovász BV, Meszarics R, Jeges S, Tóth Á, Szalma J. Direct resin composite restorations for fractured maxillary teeth and diastema closure: A 7 years retrospective evaluation of survival and influencing factors. Dent Mater. 2017;33(4):467-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/2017.02.001
  19. Lohbauer Belli R, Ferracane JL. Factors involved in mechanical fatigue degradation of dental resin composites. J Dent Res. 2013;92(7):584-591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513490734
  20. Mahmoud SH, Ali AK, Hegazi HA. A three-year prospective randomized study of silorane- and methacrylate-based composite restorative systems in class II restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(3):285-292. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a31939
  21. Mahmoud SH, El Embaby AE, AbdAllah AM. Clinical performance of ormocer, nanofilled, and nanoceramic resin composites in class I and class II restorations: a three-year evaluation. Oper Dent. 2014;39(1):32-42. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-313-C
  22. Moraschini V, Fai CK, Alto RM, Dos Santos GO. Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43(9):1043-1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.005
  23. Moura FR, Romano AR, Lund RG, Riva E, Rodrigues Yunior SA, Demarco FF. Three-year clinical performance of composite restorations placed by undergraduate dental students. Braz Dent J. 2011;22(2):111-116. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402011000200004
  24. Prabhu R, Bhaskaran S, Geetha Prabhu KR, Eswaran MA, Phanikrishna G, Deepthi B. Clinical evaluation of direct composite restoration done for midline diastema closure-long-term study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015;7(suppl 2):559-562. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406
  25. Rasines Alcaraz M, Veitz-Keenan A, Sahrmann P, Schmidlin PR, Davis D, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3: CD005620. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858
  26. Rohani B, Barekatain M, Farhad SZ, Haghayegh N. Influence of Hand Instrumentation and Ultrasonic Scaling on the Microleakage of various Cervical Restorations: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18(6):437-442. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2061
  27. Sharif MO, Catleugh M, Merry A, Tickle M, Dunne SM, Brunton P, Aggarwal VR, Chong LY. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: resin composite. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2:CD005971. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005971
  28. Shimizu Y, Tada K, Seki H, Kakuta K, Miyagawa Y, Shen JF, Morozumi Y, Kamoi H, Sato S. Effects of air polishing on the resin composite-dentin interface. Odontology. 2014;102(2):279-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-013-0111-8
  29. Spencer P, Ye Q, Park J, Topp EM, Misra A, Marangos O, Wang Y, Bohaty BS, Singh V, Sene F, Eslick J, Camarda K, Katz JL. Adhesive/Dentin interface: the weak link in the composite restoration. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(6):1989-2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-9969-6
  30. Spencer P, Ye O, Misra A, Gonsalves SE, Laurence JS. Proteins, pathogens, and failure at the composite — tooth interface. J Dent Res. 2014;93(12):243-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514550039
  31. van Dijken JW, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Lindberg A. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. Dent Mater. 2007;23(9):1101-1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.005
  32. Van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Clinical performance of a hybrid resin composite with and without an intermediate layer of flowable resin composite: a 7-year evaluation. Dent Mater. 2011;27(2):150-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/.2010.09.010
  33. Van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two step etch-and-rinse adhesive. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(6):1371-1379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1345-8
  34. Van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Three-year Randomized Clinical Study of a One-step Universal Adhesive and a Two-step Self-etch Adhesive in Class II Composite Restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(4):287-294. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a38867
  35. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):100-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148
  36. Wilder AD Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Heymann HO, Ritter AV, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC. A 12-year clinical evaluation of a three-step dentin adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(5):526-535. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0220
  37. Yazici AR Ustunkol I, Ozgunaltay G, Davangac B. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations. Oper Dent. 2014;39(3):248-255. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-221-C
  38. Yazici AR, Antonson SA, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E. Thirty-Six — Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations. Oper Dent. 2017;42(5):478-485. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-220-C
  39. Zhang Z, Beitzel D, Mutluay M, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Arola D. On the durability of resin-dentin bonds: Identifying the weakest links. Dent Mater. 2015;31(9):1109-1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.011
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.