The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Baeva I.Yu.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Orenburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Orenburg, Russia

Konstantinova O.D.

Kafedra akusherstva i ginekologii Orenburgskoĭ gosudarstvennoĭ meditsinskoĭ akademii

Big fetus: Labor management tactics

Authors:

Baeva I.Yu., Konstantinova O.D.

More about the authors

Read: 33648 times


To cite this article:

Baeva IYu, Konstantinova OD. Big fetus: Labor management tactics. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2015;15(3):44‑47. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush201515344-47

Recommended articles:

References:

  1. Balasheva E.A., Zhdanova Ju.A., Minaev N.N. Determination of the entity of the most informative signes for the classification of the functionally narrow pelvis. Zhurnal prakticheskoi i teoreticheskoi biologii i mediciny 2005; 4: 1: 82—87. (In Russ).
  2. Gul’chenko O.V., Nikiforovskii N.K., Pokusaeva V.N., Stas’ L.I. Perinatal results of macrosomic fetuses. Rossiiskii vestnik akushera-ginekologa 2010; 10: 1: 55—58. (In Russ).
  3. Neurology of the newborns: acute phase and late complications. Moscow: BINOM Laboratory knowledge 2006; 368. (In Russ).
  4. Serov V.N. Problems of the perinatal obstetrics. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya 2001; 6: 3—5. (In Russ).
  5. Biortad A.K., Irgens-Hansen K., Daltveit A.K., Irgens L.M. Мacrosomia: mode delivery and pregnancy outcome. Acta Оbstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89: 5: 664—669.
  6. Mahony К., Walsh C., Foley M.E. Outcome of second delivery after prior macrosomic infant in women with normal glucose tolerance. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 4: 857—862.
  7. Koyangi A., Zhang О., Dagvadory A., Hirayama А. Мacrosomia in 23 developing countries: an analysis a multicountry facility-based cross-section survey. Lancet 2013; 381: 9865: 476—483.
  8. Melo A.S., Amorim M.H., Gondim S.S. Maternal factors associated with fetal weight estimated by ultrasonography. Obstet Rev Bras Ginecol 2008; 30: 9: 459—465.
  9. Henriksen T. The macrosomia fetus a challenge in current obstetrics. Acta Obstet Gynecol 2008; 87: 134—145.
  10. Cherepnina A.L., Panina O.B., Oleshkevich L.N. Couгse of pregnancy and delivery mode in macrosomic fetus. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii 2005; 4: 15—19. (In Russ).
  11. . Donma M.M. Macrosomia, top of the iceberg: the charm of underlying factors. Pediatr Int 2011; 53: 1: 78—84.
  12. Ginsberg N.A., Moisidis C. How to predict recurrent shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 1427—1429.
  13. Witkop C.T., Neale В. Wilson L.M., Bass E.B. Active compared with expectant delivery management in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 1: 193—205.
  14. Navti O.B., Ndumbe F.M., Konje J.C. The peri-partum management of pregnancies with macrosomic babies weighing > or = 4500 at tertiary University Hospital J Obstet Gynaec 2007; 27: 3: 267—270.
  15. Mehta S.H., Bujold Y., Blackwell S.C., Sorokin Y., Sokol R.J. Is abnormal labor associated with shoulder dystocia in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1604—1607.
  16. Mehta S.H., Blackwell S.C., Chadha К., Sokol R.J. Shoulder dystocia and the next delivery: outcomes and management. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 20: 729—733.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.