Related marriage: the current state of the problem

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Electroencephalography: features of the obtained data and its applicability in psychiatry. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(5):31-39

Polymorphism and modern diagnostic approaches for Leber congenital amaurosis. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(5):56-62

The role of dopaminergic genes in chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache. Russian Journal of Pain. 2024;(4):24-29

The article presents a review of world literature on the current state of the problems of related marriage. The analysis of the literature review showed that in most cases, the researchers studied, as a rule, the perinatal outcomes of related marriages, and only a few studies were devoted to studying the reproductive potential of women born in related marriages.

Keywords:

marriage

kinship network

genetics

Authors:

Bobdzhonova O.B.

Avicenna Tajik State Medical University

Abdurakhmanova F.M.

Avicenna Tajik State Medical University

Sharipova M.B.

Republican Medical Genetic Center under the Ministry of Health and Social Protection the Republic of Tajikistan

Received:

13.12.2019

Accepted:

04.04.2020

List of references:

Vogel F, Motulsky A. Human Genetics. Problems and Approaches. Springer Verlag, Berlin—Heidelberg—New York; 1979. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.4710230321
Ochilzoda AA, Karimov TM, Karimov KhKh, Dzhalilov DA, Sharipov SYo. The state of hearing in children with hearing loss due to a parental marriage. Vestnik Kazakhskogo Natsional’nogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2016;4:124-129. (In Russ.).
Murzakhanov YuI. Family and marriage Institute of the Nalchik mountain Jews: traditions and modernity. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul’tura. 2016;4:66-68 (In Russ.).
Magomedova ASh, Omarov NSM. Perinatal aspects of consanguineous marriages. Arkhiv vnutrenney meditsiny. 2016;6(S1):15-16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2016-6-1s
Malikova DB, Kurbanov DD. Characterization of clinical indicators in women with infertility living in Andijan region. Zhurnal teoreticheskoy i klinicheskoy meditsiny. 2014;4:92-95 (In Russ.).
Koc I, Ali Eryurt M. The causal relationship between consanguineous marriages and infant mortality in Turkey. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2017;49(4):536-555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002193201600033X
Maghsoudlou S, Cnattingius S, Aarabi M, Montgomery SM, Semnani S, Stephansson O, Wikström AK, Bahmanyar S. Consanguineous marriage, prepregnancy maternal characteristics and stillbirth risk: a population-based case—control study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2015;94(10):1095-1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12699
Fareed M, Kaisar Ahmad M, Azeem Anwar M, Afzal M. Impact of consanguineous marriages and degrees of inbreeding on fertility, child mortality, secondary sex ratio, selection intensity, and genetic load: a cross-sectional study from Northern India. Pediatric Research. 2017;81(1-1):18-26. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2016.177
Khoury SA, Massad DF. Consanguinity, fertility, reproductive wastage, infant mortality and congenital malformations in Jordan. Saudi Medical Journal. 2000;21(2):150-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320430502
Ivanov AG. Medical and social ways of improving reproduction potential of young people. Rossiyskiy mediko-biologicheskiy vestnik im. akad. I.P. Pavlova. 2004;3-4:105-107. (In Russ.).
Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B, Feingold J. Parental consanguinity as a cause of increased incidence of birth defects in a study of 131,760 consecutive births. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 1994; 49(1):114-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320490123
Jaouad IC. Elalaoui SC, Sbiti A, Elkerh F, Belmahi L, Sefiani A. Consanguineous marriages in Morocco and the consequence for the incidence of autosomal recessive disorders. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2009;41(5):575-581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932009003393
Olubunmia O, Neves K, Ahmed B, Konje JC. A review of the reproductive consequences of consanguinity. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2019;232:87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.042
Yunis K, Mumtaz G, Bitar F, Chamseddine F, Kassar M, Rashkidi J, Makhoul G, Tamim H. Consanguineous marriage and congenital heart defects: a case-control study in the neonatal period. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 2006;140(14):1524-1530. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.31309
Bokhari N, Gillani S, Khalil GHK, Akhtar S. Reproductive health effects of consanguineous marriages in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015;23(1):17-20.
Al-Arrayed S, Hamamy H. The changing profile of consanguinity rates in Bahrain, 1990—2009. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2012; 44(3):313-319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932011000666
Saggar AK, Bittles A. Consanguinity and child health. Paediatrics and Child Health. 2008;18(5):244-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paed.2008.02.008
Manglos‐Weber N, Weinreb A. Own‐Choice Marriage and Fertility in Turkey. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2016;79(2):372-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12348.
Zakzouk S. Consanguinity and hearing impairment in developing countries: a custom to be discouraged. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 2002;116(10):811-816. https://doi.org/10.1258/00222150260293628
Mehndiratta MM, Paul B, Mehndiratta P Arranged marriage, consanguinity and epilepsy. Neurology Asia. 2007;12(1):15-17.
Chentouf A, Talhi R, Dahdouh A, Benbihi L, Benilha S, Oubaiche ML, Chaouch M. Consanguinity and epilepsy in Oran, Algeria: A case-control study. Epilepsy Research. 2015;111:10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.12.014
Port K, Bittles AH. A Population-Based Estimate of the Prevalence of Consanguineous Marriage in Western Australia. Community Genetics. 2001;4:97-101. https://doi.org/10.1159/000051166
Belal S, Alzahrani A, Alsulaimani A, Afeefy A. Effect of parental consanguinity on neonatal anthropometric measurements and preterm birth in Taif, Saudi Arabia. Translational Research in Anatomy. 2018;13:12-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2018.11.003
Tadmouri GO, Nair P, Obeid T, Al Ali MT, Al Khaja N, Hamamy HA. Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Reproductive Health. 2009;6:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-6-17.
Islam MM. Effects of consanguineous marriage on reproductive behaviour, adverse pregnancy outcomes and offspring mortality in Oman. Annals of Human Biology. 2013;40(3):243-255. https://doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2012.760649
Saad FA, Jauniaux E. Recurrent early pregnancy loss and consanguinity. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2002;5(2):167-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61620-3
Makhmadzhonov DM, Sultonov SHR, Sattorov AM. Diagnosis of complicated nephrolithiasis in children. Rossiyskiy vestnik detskoy khirurgii, anesteziologii i reanimatologii. 2016;6(1):47-50. (In Russ.).
Kuzibayeva NK. Risk factors for the formation of congenital heart defects in children in Tajikistan. Vestnik Avitsenny. 2013;4:99-103. (In Russ.).
Saatova GM, Furtikova AB, Zhanturayeva BT. The risk of congenital heart defects in children in Kyrgyzstan. Interaktivnaya nauka. 2016;10:53-56. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21661/r-115051
Khodzhamurodova DA. The structure of the causes and diagnosis of barren marriage among residents of the Republic of Tajikistan. Vestnik Avitsenny. 2010;4:71-77. (In Russ.).
Seher T, Thiering E, Al Azemi M, Heinrich J, Schmidt-Weber CB, Kivlahan C, Gutermuth J, Fatemi HM. Is parental consanguinity associated with reduced ovarian reserve? Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2015;31(3):427-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.06.003
El-Naser A, El-Gaber A, Yahiya A. Consanguinity and ovarian reserve (Upper Egypt). AAMJ: Asian Academy of Management Journal. 2013;11(4):140-155.

Close metadata