The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Gromova O.S.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Manturova N.E.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University;
Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology

Zhurkina M.P.

Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology

Comparison of materials used in upper eyelid ptosis surgery

Authors:

Gromova O.S., Manturova N.E., Zhurkina M.P.

More about the authors

Journal: Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024;(4‑2): 67‑71

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202404267

Views: 703

Downloaded: 35

Download PDF (RU)
Download PDF
Contact the author
Table of contents

COMPARISON OF MATERIALS USED IN UPPER EYELID PTOSIS SURGERY
COMPARISON OF MATERIALS USED IN UPPER EYELID PTOSIS SURGERY

To cite this article:

Gromova OS, Manturova NE, Zhurkina MP. Comparison of materials used in upper eyelid ptosis surgery. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024;(4‑2):67‑71. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202404267

Подписка 2025-2 (Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Ocular myasthenia gravis. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(4):86-91

We analyzed literature data on materials used in surgical treatment of upper eyelid ptosis. Effectiveness, advantages and disadvantages of each material are considered. Any material for surgical treatment of eyelid ptosis should correspond to periorbital anatomical features and cause the least number of complications requiring repeated surgical intervention. Among all materials, autologous and allogeneic fascia lata, as well as Gore-Tex implant, deserve special attention. These materials ensure the lowest rates of adverse reactions. Currently, searching for optimal material in surgical treatment of ptosis remains relevant, and there is a need for further research.

Keywords:

upper eyelid ptosis
surgical correction
materials for surgical correction

Authors:

Gromova O.S.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Manturova N.E.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University;
Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology

Zhurkina M.P.

Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology

Received:

09.09.2024

Accepted:

27.09.2024

List of references:

  1. Lake S, Mohammad-Ali FH, Khooshabeh R. Open sky Müller’s muscle-conjunctiva resection for ptosis surgery. Eye (London). 2003;17(9):1008-1012. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700623
  2. Marcet MM, Setabutr P, Lemke BN, Collins ME, Fleming JC, Wesley RE, Pinto JM, Putterman AM. Surgical microanatomy of the müller muscle-conjunctival resection ptosis procedure. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2010;26(5):360-364.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181cb79a2
  3. Guo Z, Park DDH, Park K, Guo N. Three Different Anesthesia Approaches in Blepharoptosis Surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery — Global Open. 2019;7(4):e2136. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002136
  4. Bacharach J, Lee WW, Harrison AR, Freddo TF. A review of acquired blepharoptosis: prevalence, diagnosis, and current treatment options. Eye (London). 2021;35(9):2468-2481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01547-5
  5. Aytogan H, Ayıntap E. Comparing the symmetry of upper eyelid following unilateral ptosis correction. BMC Ophthalmology. 2021;21(1):438.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02208-7
  6. Kataev MG, Biryukova YuE. Outcomes of suspension-type operations in upper eyelid ptosis using various materials. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2016;3:102-105. (In Russ.). Accessed August 30, 2024. https://eyepress.ru/article/iskhody-operatsiy-podveshivayushchego-tipa-pri-ptoze-verkhnego-veka-s-ispol-zova
  7. Kakizaki H, Malhotra R, Selva D. Upper eyelid anatomy: an update. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2009;63(3):336-343.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31818b42f7
  8. Callahan A. Reconstructive Surgery of the Eyelids and Ocular Adnexa. Birmingham: Aesculapius; 1966.
  9. Koka K, Patel BC. Ptosis Correction. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
  10. Reinhard E, Spampinato H. The OD’s guide to ptosis workup. Revew of Optometry. 2020;157:68-73. Accessed September 15, 2024. https://www.reviewofoptometry.com/article/the-ods-guide-to-ptosis-workup
  11. Hamedani AG, Gold DR. Eyelid Dysfunction in Neurodegenerative, Neurogenetic, and Neurometabolic Disease. Frontiers in Neurology. 2017;8:329.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00329
  12. Victor M, Ropper AH. Adams and Victor’s Principles of Neurology. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2001.
  13. Latting MW, Huggins AB, Marx DP, Giacometti JN. Clinical Evaluation of Blepharoptosis: Distinguishing Age-Related Ptosis from Masquerade Conditions. Seminars in Plastic Surgery. 2017;31(1):5-16.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1598188
  14. Meyer DR, Stern JH, Jarvis JM, Lininger LL. Evaluating the visual field effects of blepharoptosis using automated static perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(5):651-659.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(93)31593-9
  15. Finsterer J. Ptosis: causes, presentation, and management. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2003;27(3):193-204.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-0127-5
  16. Danesh J, Ugradar S, Goldberg R, Rootman DB. A novel technique for the measurement of eyelid contour to compare outcomes following Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection and external levator resection surgery. Eye (London). 2018;32(9):1493-1497. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0105-4
  17. Pauly M, Sruthi R. Ptosis: evaluation and management. Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019;31(1):11-16.  https://doi.org/10.4103/kjo.kjo_2_19
  18. Baggio E, Ruban JM. [Postoperative ptosis: etiopathogenesis, clinical analysis, and therapeutic management. Apropos of a series of 43 cases]. Journal Francais d’Ophtalmologie. 1998;21(5):361-373. 
  19. Ben Simon GJ, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. External levator advancement vs Müller’s muscle-conjunctival resection for correction of upper eyelid involutional ptosis. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2005;140(3):426-432.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.033
  20. Berlin AJ, Vestal KP. Levator aponeurosis surgery. A retrospective review. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(7):1033-1037.
  21. Cates CA, Tyers AG. Outcomes of anterior levator resection in congenital blepharoptosis. Eye (London). 2001;15(Pt 6):770-773.  https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2001.247
  22. Frueh BR, Musch DC, McDonald H. Efficacy and efficiency of a new involutional ptosis correction procedure compared to a traditional aponeurotic approach. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 2004; 102:199-207. 
  23. Lucarelli MJ, Lemke BN. Small incision external levator repair: technique and early results. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1999;127(6):637-644.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00064-1
  24. Older JJ. Levator aponeurosis surgery for the correction of acquired ptosis. Analysis of 113 procedures. Ophthalmology. 1983;90(9):1056-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(83)80047-5
  25. Pan E, Chen WL, Zhang SC, Chen Y, Yu JG. Mild to moderate blepharoptosis correction: Outcomes of levator aponeurosis posterior layer plication. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(12):e19038. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019038
  26. Putterman AM, Fett DR. Müller’s muscle in the treatment of upper eyelid ptosis: a ten-year study. Ophthalmic Surgery. 1986;17(6):354-360. 
  27. Carter SR, Meecham WJ, Seiff SR. Silicone frontalis slings for the correction of blepharoptosis: indications and efficacy. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(4): 623-630.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30643-x
  28. Goldberger S, Conn H, Lemor M. Double rhomboid silicone rod frontalis suspension. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1991;7(1):48-53.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00002341-199103000-00006
  29. Hersh D, Martin FJ, Rowe N. Comparison of silastic and banked fascia lata in pediatric frontalis suspension. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2006;43(4):212-218.  https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20060701-02
  30. Rowan PJ, Hayes GS. Silicone sling for ptosis. Southern Medical Journal. 1977;70(1):68-69.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-197701000-00029
  31. Leone CR Jr, Shore JW, Van Gemert JV. Silicone rod frontalis sling for the correction of blepharoptosis. Ophthalmic Surgery. 1981;12(12):881-887. 
  32. Théra JP, Tiama JM, Konipo A, Napo A, Bamani S. [Treatment of congenital ptosis in a low-income country: polypropylene frontalis sling at the African Institute of Tropical Ophthalmology]. Journal Francais d’Ophtalmologie. 2020;43(2):123-127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2019.07.008
  33. Manners RM, Tyers AG, Morris RJ. The use of Prolene as a temporary suspensory material for brow suspension in young children. Eye (London). 1994;8(Pt 3):346-348.  https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1994.72
  34. Wasserman BN, Sprunger DT, Helveston EM. Comparison of materials used in frontalis suspension. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2001;119(5):687-691.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.5.687
  35. Henderson JW. Relief of eyelid retraction: a surgical procedure. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1965;74:205-216.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1965.00970040207015
  36. Anderson RL, Dixon RS. Aponeurotic ptosis surgery. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1979;97(6):1123-1128. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1979.01020010577015
  37. Katowitz JA. Frontalis suspension in congenital ptosis using a polyfilament, cable-type suture. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1979;97(9):1659-1663. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1979.01020020227009
  38. Yoon JS, Lee SY. Long-term functional and cosmetic outcomes after frontalis suspension using autogenous fascia lata for pediatric congenital ptosis. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(7):1405-1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.040
  39. Spoor TC, Kwitko GM. Blepharoptosis repair by fascia lata suspension with direct tarsal and frontalis fixation. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1990; 109(3):314-317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)74557-x
  40. Downes RN, Collin JR. The Mersilene mesh sling: a new concept in ptosis surgery. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1989;73(7):498-501.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.73.7.498
  41. Hintschich CR, Zürcher M, Collin JR. Mersilene mesh brow suspension: efficiency and complications. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1995;79(4): 358-361.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.79.4.358
  42. Elder MJ. Mersilene mesh and fascia lata in brow suspension: a comparative study. Ophthalmic Surgery. 1993;24(2):105-108. 
  43. Colton JJ, Beekhuis GJ. Use of Mersilene mesh in nasal augmentation. Facial Plastic Surgery. 1992;8(3):149-156.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1064645
  44. Lam DS, Gandhi SR, Ng JS, Chen IN, Kwok PS, Chan GH. Early correction of severe unilateral infant ptosis with the Mersilene mesh sling. Eye (London). 1997;11 (Pt 6):806-809.  https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.210
  45. Kemp EG, MacAndie K. Mersilene mesh as an alternative to autogenous fascia lata in brow suspension. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2001;17(6):419-422.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00002341-200111000-00006
  46. Mehta P, Patel P, Olver JM. Functional results and complications of Mersilene mesh use for frontalis suspension ptosis surgery. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2004;88(3):361-364.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2002.009951
  47. Mehta P, Patel P, Olver JM. Management of Mersilene mesh chronic eyelid complications: a systematic approach. Eye (London). 2004;18(6):640-642.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700681
  48. Adenis JP, Lebraud P, Mathon M. [Use of polytetrafluoroethylene (Goretex) in the palpebrofrontalis muscle suspension in ptosis]. Journal Francais d’Ophtalmologie. 1987;10(10):607-609. 
  49. Bajaj MS, Sastry SS, Ghose S, Betharia SM, Pushker N. Evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene suture for frontalis suspension as compared to polybutylate-coated braided polyester. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2004;32(4):415-419.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00818.x
  50. Zweep HP, Spauwen PH. Evaluation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and autogenous fascia lata in frontalis suspension. A comparative clinical study. Acta Chirurgiae Plasticae. 1992;34(3):129-137. 
  51. Steinkogler FJ, Kuchar A, Huber E, Arocker-Mettinger E. Gore-Tex soft-tissue patch frontalis suspension technique in congenital ptosis and in blepharophimosis-ptosis syndrome. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1993;92(6): 1057-1060. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199311000-00009
  52. Derby GS. Correction of Ptosis by Fascia Lata Hammock. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1928;11(5):352-354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(28)91628-1
  53. Ben Simon GJ, Macedo AA, Schwarcz RM, Wang DY, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. Frontalis suspension for upper eyelid ptosis: evaluation of different surgical designs and suture material. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2005;140(5):877-885.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2005.05.031
  54. Payr E. Plastik mittels freier Faszientransplantation bei Ptosis. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. 1909;35:822. 
  55. Wright WW. The use of living sutures in the treatment of ptosis. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1922;51:99-102. 
  56. Crawford JS. Repair of ptosis using frontalis muscle and fascia lata: a 20-year review. Ophthalmic Surgery. 1977;8(4):31-40. 
  57. Kakizaki H. Gankeiseigeka Tora No Maki. Tokyo: Medical Aoi; 2009.
  58. Wagner RS, Mauriello JA Jr, Nelson LB, Calhoun JH, Flanagan JC, Harley RD. Treatment of congenital ptosis with frontalis suspension: a comparison of suspensory materials. Ophthalmology. 1984;91(3):245-248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34298-1
  59. Esmaeli B, Chung H, Pashby RC. Long-term results of frontalis suspension using irradiated, banked fascia lata. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1998;14(3):159-163.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00002341-199805000-00002
  60. O’Reilly J, Lanigan B, Bowell R, O’Keefe M. Congenital ptosis: longterm results using stored fascia lata. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 1998; 76(3):346-348.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760319.x
  61. Crawford JS. Frontalis sling operation. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 1982;19:253-255.  https://doi.org/10.3928/0191-3913-19820901-14
  62. Beyer CK, Albert DM. The use and fate of fascia lata and sclera in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. Ophthalmology. 1981;88(9):869-886.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(81)80001-2
  63. Lee J, Lee H, Chang M, Park M, Baek S. Clinical Results of Modified Frontalis Suspension Technique Using Preserved Fascia Lata for Congenital Ptosis. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2016;27(5):e477-e481. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002700
  64. Wilson ME, Johnson RW. Congenital ptosis. Long-term results of treatment using lyophilized fascia lata for frontalis suspensions. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98(8):1234-1237.
  65. Whitehouse GM, Grigg JR, Martin FJ. Congenital ptosis: results of surgical management. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology. 1995; 23(4):309-314.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.1995.tb00181.x
  66. Crawford JS. Fascia lata: its nature and fate after implantation and its use in ophthalmic surgery. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 1968;66:673-745. 
  67. Crawford JS. Recent trends in ptosis surgery. Annals of Ophthalmology. 1975; 7(9):1263-1267.
  68. Crawford JS. Repair of ptosis using frontalis muscle and fascia lata. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 1956;60(5):672-678. 
  69. Broughton WL, Matthews JG 2nd, Harris DJ Jr. Congenital ptosis. Results of treatment using lyophilized fascia lata for frontalis suspensions. Ophthalmology. 1982;89(11):1261-1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34645-x

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.