Natural Beauty authorial system of planning for breast augmentation

Arshakyan V.A.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia201903152

Arshakyan V.A.

Novosibirsk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Novosibirsk, Russia, Novosibirsk National Research State University, Novosibirsk, Russia

Natural Beauty authorial system of planning for breast augmentation

Authors:

Arshakyan V.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2019;(3): 52‑61

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia201903152

Read: 1968 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Arshakyan VA. Natural Beauty authorial system of planning for breast augmentation. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2019;(3):52‑61. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia201903152

Подписка 2026 Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина (Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Long-term results of scarring after breast surgery. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(2):70-75

Safety of silicone breast implants: a panel discussion. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(3):118-124

Abstract:

Abstract Objective — to improve the results of aesthetic breast augmentation surgery via introduction of the system of mammary implant selection. Material and methods. A study included 322 patients aged 20—40 years, height of 156—180 cm, chest circumference 66—80 cm, normal body mass index, absence of ptosis and the distance from the nipple to the inframammary fold of 5—8 cm. All patients underwent Natural Beauty augmentation mammoplasty. There were no preoperative skin diseases or acute diseases. Results and conclusion. Natural Beauty planning system for augmentation mammoplasty is a new word in plastic surgery and has no analogues in the world. This technique is useful for quick and accurate selection of the optimal breast implant with a guarantee of the most aesthetically acceptable result in long-term postoperative period. This result is comparable with mean aesthetic standard for the breast.

Keywords:

authorial system of planning

breast augmentation

Natural Beauty

Authors:

Arshakyan V.A.

Novosibirsk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Novosibirsk, Russia, Novosibirsk National Research State University, Novosibirsk, Russia

Close metadata

References:

Cronin TD, Gerow FJ. Augmentation Mammaplasty: A New «Natural Feel» Prosthesis. In Broadbent. 1964;41-49.
Adamyan AA. Atlas plasticheskikh operatsii na grudnoi stenke s ispol’zovaniem endoprotezov (Atlas of plastic surgery on the chest wall using endoprostheses). Moskva: Mir iskusstva, 1994. (In Russ.)
Azimova RB. Dvoinaya skladka posle augmentatsii «normal’no razvitoi» molochnoi zhelezy (Double fold after augmentation of a «normally developed» mammary gland). Annaly plasticheskoy, rekonstruktivnoy i esteticheskoy khirurgii. 2009;1:73-84. (In Russ.)
Belousov AE. Plastic reconstructive and aesthetic surgery. Sankt-Peterburg: Gippokrat, 1998. (In Russ.)
Gabka KD, Bomert Kh. Plasticheskaya i rekonstruktivnaya khirurgiya molochnoi zhelezy (Breast plastic and reconstructive surgery). Moskva: MEDpress-inform, 2010. (In Russ.)
Greben‘kova OB. Plastika molochnykh zhelez. (Breast plastic surgery). Novosibirsk: Ofset, 1994. (In Russ.)
Dobryakova OB, Kovyntsev NN. Augmentatsionnaya mammoplastika silikonovymi protezami (Augmentation mammoplasty with silicone prostheses). Moskva: MOK TsENTR, 2000. (In Russ.)
Dobryakova OB, Dobryakov BS, Dobryakov BB, Gulev VS. Izbrannye voprosy plasticheskoi khirurgii. T. 1. Plastika molochnykh zhelez (Selected issues of plastic surgery. Volume 1. Breast Surgery). Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2011. (In Russ.)
Kuznetsov AYu. Atlas anatomii cheloveka dlya khudozhnikov (Atlas of Human Anatomy for Artists). Rostov-na-Donu: Fenix, 2002. (In Russ.)
Milanov NO, Startseva OI, Andryushchenko OA. Analiz opyta vypolneniya korrigiruyushchikh operatsii posle esteticheskoi mammoplastiki (Analysis of the experience of corrective operations after aesthetic mammoplasty), I Vseukrainskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem «Aktual’nye problemy esteticheskoy i rekonstruktivnoy khirurgii molochnoy zhelezy». Kiev. 2004. (In Russ.)
Milanov NO, Startseva OI, Kelexaeva MV. Complication of Breast Augmentation. Abstracts of the 14-th International Congress IPRAS. Berlin. 2007.
Del Yerro JLM. Anatomic Cohesive Gel Implants: Reshaping the Breast in Different Body Types. Innovations in Plastic Surgery. 2007;1(3):15-36.
Gabriel A, Fritzsche S, Creasman C. Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetries: 4D photography. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31:506-510.
Gladilin E, Gabrielova B, Montemurro P, Hedén P. Customized planning of augmentation mammaplasty with silicone implants using three-dimensional optical body scans and biomechanical modeling of soft tissue outcome. Aesth Plast Surg. 2011;35(4):494-501.
Guehring J. Dense 3-D surface acquisition by structured light using off-the-shelf components. Electronic Imaging. 2001;4309:220-232. http://www.ifp.uni-stuttgart.de/publications/2001/Videometrics01-Guehring-4309-24.pdf
Hammond DC. Atlas of aesthetic breast surgery. Saunders Elsevier. 2009.
Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D-surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast. 2007;16:137-145.
Kovacs L, Yassouridis A, Zimmermann A. Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:229-236.
Losken A. Commentary on Four-Dimensional Breast Imaging. Parts I and II. Aesth Surg J. 2011;31(8):939.
Milanov IO, Startseva OI. Analiz prichin povtornykh operatsii v plasticheskoi esteticheskoi khirurgii (Analysis of the reasons for repeated operations in aesthetic plastic surgery), Al’manakh Instituta Khirurgii im. A.V. Vishnevskogo. 2008;3(2):85. (In Russ.)
Pavlyuchenko LL. Rabochaya klassifikatsiya pri esteticheskikh plasticheskikh operatsiyakh na molochnoi zheleze (Working classification for aesthetic plastic surgery on the mammary gland). Materialy Vserossiyskoiy konferentsii «Rekonstruktivno-vosstanovitel’naya khirurgiya molochnoy zhelezy». Moskva. 1996. (In Russ.)
Pshenisnov KP. Kurs plasticheskoi khirurgii (Plastic Surgery Course). T. 2. Rybinsk: Rybinskiy dom pechati, 2010. (In Russ.)
Frishberg IA. Khirurgicheskaya korrektsiya kosmeticheskikh deformatsii zhenskoi grudi (Surgical correction of cosmetic deformities of the female breast). Moskva: Nauka, 1997.
Heden P. Breast augmentation with anatomic, high- cohesiveness silicone gel implants. In: Spear SL, ed. Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art. 2^nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
Heden P, Bone B, Murphy DK. Style 410 cohesive silicone breast implants: safety and effectiveness at 5 to 9 years after implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1281-1287.
Tebbetts JB. McGhan’s BioDimensional TM System for Augmentation Mammaplasty. McGhan Medical Corporation. Workbook and accompanying videodisc and videotape. Dallas, Texas: Multimedia Records, Inc; 1993.
Tebbetts JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(7):35-45.
Prives MG. Anatomiya cheloveka (Human anatomy). Izdanie 9-e. Moskva: Medicina, 1985. (In Russ.)
Sapina MR. Anatomiya cheloveka (Human anatomy). V 2 t., 5-e izd. Moskva: Medicina, 2001. (In Russ.)
Sinel’nikov RD, Sinel’nikov YaR. Atlas anatomii cheloveka (Atlas of Human Anatomy). V 4 t., izdanie vtoroe, stereotipnoe. Moskva: Medicina, 1996. (In Russ.).
Agur A, Dalley A. Grant’s atlas of anatomy. 12^th ed. Netherlands, Groningen: Wolters Kluwer, 2009.
Frank N. Atlas of human anatomy. 3^rd ed. Elsevier Sciencen. 2008.