Anatomical, topographic and clinical aspects of distal radial access for percutaneous coronary interventions

Prazdnikov E.N.; Milenkin B.I.; Baranov G.A.; Ovcharov S.E.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/operhirurg2022602120

Prazdnikov E.N.

Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

ORCID: 0000-0002-5817-0702

Milenkin B.I.

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry;
Vorokhobov City Clinical Hospital No.67

Baranov G.A.

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Ovcharov S.E.

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Anatomical, topographic and clinical aspects of distal radial access for percutaneous coronary interventions

Authors:

Prazdnikov E.N., Milenkin B.I., Baranov G.A., Ovcharov S.E.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2022;6(2): 20‑25

DOI: 10.17116/operhirurg2022602120

Read: 2220 times

To cite this article:

Prazdnikov EN, Milenkin BI, Baranov GA, Ovcharov SE. Anatomical, topographic and clinical aspects of distal radial access for percutaneous coronary interventions. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2022;6(2):20‑25. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/operhirurg2022602120

Подписка 2026 Оперативная хирургия и клиническая анатомия (Пироговский научный журнал) (Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

To study the features of the distal radial access at the back of the hand for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) based on anatomical, topographic and basic clinical aspects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective register of patients 2019—2021 (104 patients) who underwent PCI by puncture of the radial artery on the back of the left hand.

RESULTS

The success rate of puncture of the radial artery on the back of the left hand was 96.2% (100 patients). In 84 (84%) patients, artery puncture was successful at the first attempt, in 14 (14%) — at the second and in 2 (2%) — at the third. The average arterial puncture time was 18 seconds. The time of hemostasis during endovascular intervention of diagnostic coronary angiography (45% of cases) was 6 hours, and during stenting in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy (55% of cases) — 12 hours. Hemorrhagic complications at the puncture site were noted in 4 (4%) patients, the maximum size of the hematoma was less than 5 cm; in 1 (1%) — a flat subcutaneous hematoma measuring about 10×5 cm.

CONCLUSION

The use of distal radial access in clinical practice has shown its technical feasibility. Distal radial access at the back of the hand can be recommended for the development and introduction into the treatment process during endovascular interventions as a rational alternative to the traditional puncture of the radial artery in the lower third of the forearm.

Keywords:

vascular access

distal radial access

percutaneous coronary interventions

Authors:

Prazdnikov E.N.

Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

ORCID: 0000-0002-5817-0702

Milenkin B.I.

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry;
Vorokhobov City Clinical Hospital No.67

Baranov G.A.

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Ovcharov S.E.

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Received:

10.01.2022

Accepted:

18.02.2022

Close metadata

References:

Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, Bertrand OF, Gilchrist IC. The Transradial Approach to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Historical Perspective, Current Concepts, and Future Directions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(20):2187-2195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.039
Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, Blaesing L, Burket MW, Basu A, Moore JA. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison. Am Heart J. 1999;138:430-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70143-2
Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Carins J, Niemela K, Xavier D, Widimsky R, Budaj A, Niemela M, Valentin V, Lewis B, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377:1409-1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2
Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, Rubartelli P, Briguori C, Ando G, Repetto A, Limbruno U, Cortese B, Sganzerla P, lupi A, Calli M, Colangeo S, Ierna S, Ausiello A, Presbitero P, Sardella G, Varbella F, Esposito G, Santarelli A, Tresoldi S, Nazzaro M, Zingarelli A, Tosi P, Palmieri C, Brugaletta S, Rao SV, Heg D, Rothenbuhler M, Vrabckx P, Juni P. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: A randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2465-2476.
Ferrante G, Rao SV, Juni P, Da Costa BR, Reimers B, Condorelli G, Anzuini A, Jolly SS, Bertrand OF, Krucoff MW, Windecker S, Valgimigli M. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016;9(14):1419-1433.
Russian Society of Cardiology. Clinical recommendations. Stable ischemic heart disease. 2020. (In Russ.). https://scardio.ru/content/Guidelines/2020/Clinic_rekom_IBS.pdf
Russian Society of Cardiology. Clinical recommendations. Acute myocardial infarction with elevation of the ST segment on the electrocardiogram. 2020. (In Russ.). https://scardio.ru/content/Guidelines/2020/Clinic_rekom_OKS_sST.pdf
Uhlemann M, Möbius-Winkler S, Mende M, Eitel I, Fuernau G, Sandri M, Adams V, Thiele H, Linke A, Schuler G, Gielen S. The Leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization: Impact of sheath size on vascular complications. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012;5(1):36-43.
Wagener JF, Rao SV. Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Approach to Cardiac Catheterization. Curr Atheroscler Reports. 2015;17:3.
Babunashvili A. Novel distal transradial approach for coronary and peripheral interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(13):323-324.
Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). Euro Intervention. 2017;13(7):851-857.
Pua U, Quek LH. «Snuffbox» Distal Radial Access. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(1):44.
Oliveira P, Navarro EC, Kiemeneij F. Distal transradial access as default approach for coronary angiography and interventions. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019;9(5):513-519.
Aoi S, Htun WW, Freeo S, Lee S, Kyaw H, Alfaro V, Coppola J, Pancholy S, Kwan T. Distal transradial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography as an alternative access site for faster hemostasis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;94(5):651-657.
Ziakas A, Koutouzis M, Didagelos M, Tsiafoutis I, Kouparanis A, Gossios T, Kontopodis E, Tassopoulous A, Katsanou K, Lazaris E, Karvounis H. Right arm distal transradial (snuffbox) access for coronary catheterization: Initial experience. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2020;61(2):106-109.
Lee JW, Park SW, Son JW, Ahn SG, Lee SH. Real-world experience of the left distal transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: A prospective observational study (LeDRA). Euro Intervention. 2018;14(9):e995-e1003.