The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Efanov M.G.

FGBU "Institut khirurgii im. A.V. Vishnevskogo" Minzdrava Rossii, Moskva

Alikhanov R.B.

Moscow Clinical Scientific Center;
Department of Surgery, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Tsvirkun V.V.

KB #119 FMBA RF

Prostov M.Yu.

A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia

Kazakov I.V.

Institut khirurgii im. A.V. Vishnevckogo MZ RF, Moskva

Vankovich A.N.

Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department of the Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia

Kim P.P.

Khirurgicheskiĭ statsionar #2 Tsentral'noĭ gorodskoĭ klinicheskoĭ bol'nitsy Reutova, Moskovskaia oblast'

Grendal K.D.

A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia

Early outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection

Authors:

Efanov M.G., Alikhanov R.B., Tsvirkun V.V., Prostov M.Yu., Kazakov I.V., Vankovich A.N., Kim P.P., Grendal K.D.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(11): 24‑30

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia201811124

Read: 1778 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

EARLY OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED LIVER RESECTION
EARLY OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED LIVER RESECTION

To cite this article:

Efanov MG, Alikhanov RB, Tsvirkun VV, et al. . Early outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(11):24‑30. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201811124

Подписка 2026 Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Comparative evaluation of the learning curve of lobe­ctomies performed by open and video-assisted acce­sses. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(1):46-52
The effect of the surgeon’s expe­rience on perioperative complications during videothoracoscopic lobe­ctomies in patients with stage I—II lung cancer. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(3):27-35
Abstract:

Aim — to assess an experience of robot-assisted liver resection using CUSUM-test. Material and methods. The results of 46 robot-assisted liver resections were retrospectively analyzed by using of CUSUM-test. Results. There were 3 periods in development of the technology. The 1st period — procedures with the lowest index of difficulty (n=16), the 2nd period — expansion of the indications for difficult resections (n=18) and the 3rd period — stabilization of the results (n=12). The dynamics of difficulty index, intraoperative blood loss, duration of procedure and morbidity (Clavien—Dindo Grade II—V) were evaluated. Five liver resections were needed to decrease blood loss and duration of the procedure. Expansion of indications was feasible after 16 procedures. Stable results were obtained after 34 liver resections.

Keywords:

robot-assisted liver resections
learning curve
CUSUM

Authors:

Efanov M.G.

FGBU "Institut khirurgii im. A.V. Vishnevskogo" Minzdrava Rossii, Moskva

Alikhanov R.B.

Moscow Clinical Scientific Center;
Department of Surgery, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Tsvirkun V.V.

KB #119 FMBA RF

Prostov M.Yu.

A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia

Kazakov I.V.

Institut khirurgii im. A.V. Vishnevckogo MZ RF, Moskva

Vankovich A.N.

Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department of the Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia

Kim P.P.

Khirurgicheskiĭ statsionar #2 Tsentral'noĭ gorodskoĭ klinicheskoĭ bol'nitsy Reutova, Moskovskaia oblast'

Grendal K.D.

A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia

Close metadata

References:

  1. Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller D, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G. Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection. Annals of Surgery. 2016;263(4):761-777. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001413
  2. Bagante F, Spolverato G, Strasberg S, et al. Minimally Invasive vs. Open hepatectomy: a comparative analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2016;20(9):1608-1617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3202-3
  3. Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection. Annals of Surgery. 2009;250(5):772-782. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181bd93b2
  4. Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B. Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. British Journal of Surgery. 2015;102(7):796-804. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9798
  5. Tomassini F, Scuderi V, Colman R, Vivarelli M, Montalti R, Troisi R. The single surgeon learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection. Medicine. 2016;95(43):e5138. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000005138
  6. Lin C, Tsai T, Cheng T, et al. The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection after the Louisville statement 2008: will it be more effective and smooth? Surgical Endoscopy. 2015;30(7):2895-2903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4575-1
  7. Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, et al. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. 2014;21(10):745-753. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.166
  8. Wakabayashi G. What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? HepatoBiliary Surgery and Nutrition. 2016;5(4):281-289. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2016.03.03
  9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications. Annals of Surgery. 2004;240(2):205-213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
  10. Kim PP, Bondar’ LV, Alikhanov RB, Efanov MG, Starostina NS, Melekhina OV, Kulezneva YuV. Comparative analysis of static scintigraphy and computerized tomography in assessment of remnant liver volume after advanced hepatic resection. Khirurgiya Zhurnal im N.I. Pirogova. 2017;(5):23-26. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2017523-26
  11. Kim PP, Alikhanov RB, Tsvirkun VV, Kulezneva YuV, Melekhina OV, Bondar’ LV, Starostina NS, Nikitin BS, Vinnitskaya EV, Khomeriki SG, Efanov MG. Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy for Risk Assessment of Posthepatectomy Liver Failure. Annals of surgical hepatology. 2017;22(1):14-18. (In Russ.)
  12. Kazaryan A, Røsok B, Marangos I, Rosseland A, Edwin B. Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral segments. Surgical Endoscopy. 2011;25(12):3881-3889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1815-x
  13. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):619-629. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184
  14. Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P, et al. Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surgical Endoscopy. 2009;24(5):1170-1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0745-3
  15. Cho J, Han H, Yoon Y, Shin S. Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery. 2008;144(1):32-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.020
  16. Troisi R, Patriti A, Montalti R, Casciola L. Robot assistance in liver surgery: a real advantage over a fully laparoscopic approach? Results of a comparative bi-institutional analysis. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2013;9(2):160-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1495
  17. Montalti R, Scuderi V, Patriti A, Vivarelli M, Troisi R. Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison. Surgical Endoscopy. 2015;30(3):1004-1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4284-9
  18. Wright T. Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences. 1936;3(4):122-128. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.155
  19. Hopper A, Jamison M, Lewis W. Learning curves in surgical practice. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2007;83(986):777-779. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2007.057190
  20. Kluger M, Vigano L, Barroso R, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic major liver resection. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. 2012;20(2):131-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0571-1
  21. Villani V, Bohnen J, Torabi R, Sabbatino F, Chang D, Ferrone C. «Idealized» vs. «True» learning curves: the case of laparoscopic liver resection. HPB. 2016;18(6):504-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.03.610
  22. Chan F, Cheng K, Yeung Y, Ho K. Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomy. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2016;26(3):e41-e45. https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0000000000000272
  23. van der Poel M, Besselink M, Cipriani F, et al. Outcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. JAMA Surgery. 2016;151(10):923. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1655
  24. Wald A. Sequential tests of statistical hypotheses. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1945;16(2):117-186. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177731118
  25. Im C, Cho J, Han H, et al. Validation of difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection in patients who underwent laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 2016;31(1):430-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4994-7
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.