The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Ivanov V.A.

Chuvashskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ universitet im. I.N. Ul'ianova, Vtoraia gorodskaia bol'nitsa, Cheboksary

Evseev E.P.

FGBU Rossiĭskiĭ nauchnyĭ tsentr khirurgii RAMN im. akad. B.V. Petrovskogo, Moskva

Semenova E.V.

B.V. Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery ,Department of Acquired Heart Valvular Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Aĭdamirov Ia.A.

RNTsKh im. akad. B.V. Petrovskogo RAMN, Moskva

Ivanova L.N.

B.V. Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery ,Department of Acquired Heart Valvular Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Guseinov Z.S.

B.V. Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery ,Department of Acquired Heart Valvular Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Long-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement with small biological and mechanical prostheses

Authors:

Ivanov V.A., Evseev E.P., Semenova E.V., Aĭdamirov Ia.A., Ivanova L.N., Guseinov Z.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2017;10(5): 36‑46

DOI: 10.17116/kardio201710536-46

Read: 2236 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH SMALL BIOLOGICAL AND MECHANICAL PROSTHESES
LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH SMALL BIOLOGICAL AND MECHANICAL PROSTHESES

To cite this article:

Ivanov VA, Evseev EP, Semenova EV, Aĭdamirov IaA, Ivanova LN, Guseinov ZS. Long-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement with small biological and mechanical prostheses. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2017;10(5):36‑46. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio201710536-46

Подписка 2026 Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия (Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Implantation of mitral allo­graft into tricuspid valve posi­tion for active infe­ctive endo­carditis. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(2):230-236
Abstract:

Aim — to assess feasibility of small aortic valve prostheses deployment in acquired heart defects surgery. Material and methods. At the Valvular Surgery Department of Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery 176 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with small prostheses for the period 2007—2014. There were 85 biological and 91 mechanical prostheses. Patients with bioprostheses were significantly older (68.8±6.1 vs. 55.6±10.4 years; p<0.005), had greater body surface area (1.8±0.1 vs. 1.7±0.1 m², respectively, p<0.005). There were no differences in other variables. Following prostheses were implanted: Carpentier-Edwards Perimount 19 (25), -21 (44), Mitroflow 19 (4), 21 (4), Hancock II-21 (4); ATS-18AP (22), Carbomedics 19 (5), Carbomedics 21 (43), Carbonics 20 (15), Medtronic Hall 19 (2), Medtronic Hall 21 (1), Tricardix 21 (2), MICS 21 (1). Results. 9-year survival in BioPr and MechPr groups was 88 and 95%, respectively. The number of reoperations was similar in both groups. Pressure gradients were also similar: maximum and mean gradients were 27.0±11.0/14.0±8.0 and 27.0±9.0/13.5±5.0 mm Hg, respectively (p<0.05). Conclusion. Our data confirm an effectiveness of aortic valve replacement with both biological and mechanical small prostheses in patients with body surface area < 1.8 m².

Keywords:

small prostheses
narrow aortic root
bioprosthesis

Authors:

Ivanov V.A.

Chuvashskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ universitet im. I.N. Ul'ianova, Vtoraia gorodskaia bol'nitsa, Cheboksary

Evseev E.P.

FGBU Rossiĭskiĭ nauchnyĭ tsentr khirurgii RAMN im. akad. B.V. Petrovskogo, Moskva

Semenova E.V.

B.V. Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery ,Department of Acquired Heart Valvular Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Aĭdamirov Ia.A.

RNTsKh im. akad. B.V. Petrovskogo RAMN, Moskva

Ivanova L.N.

B.V. Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery ,Department of Acquired Heart Valvular Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Guseinov Z.S.

B.V. Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery ,Department of Acquired Heart Valvular Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Close metadata

References:

  1. Belov YuV, Charchyan ER, Katkov AI, Salagaev GI, Vinokurov IA. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term results of aortic valve replacement. Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2016;9:2:46-51. (In Russ.).
  2. Davydova GB, Skopin II, Nikitina TG, Makushin AA, Mashina TV, Perepelitsa AA. Clinico-hemodynamic performance of small aortic prosthesis. Grudnaya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2001;1:28-32. (In Russ.).
  3. Ivanov VA, Evseev EP. Prosthesis of the aortal valve in adult patients with “narrow” aortic root. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2005;10:12-18. (In Russ.).
  4. Ivanov VA, Evseev EP, Aidamirov YaA, Fedulova SV, Nikityuk TG. Аortic valve reconstruction with xenopericardium. Klin. i eksperiment. khir. Zhurn. im. akad. B.V. Petrovskogo. 2016;4:16-21. (In Russ.).
  5. Skopin II, Makushin AA, Davydova GB, et al. Aortic valve failure with «narrow» root-choice of surgical treatment. Grudnaya i serdechno-sosustaya khirurgiya. 2002;2:15-20. (In Russ.).
  6. De Paulis R, D’Aleo S, Bellisario A, et al. The fate of small-size pericardial heart valve prostheses in an older patient population. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:31-39.
  7. Ivanov J, Armstrong S, David TE. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2000;102:5-9.
  8. Kindo M, Minh TH, Perrier S, et al. Impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch on early haemodynamic status after aortic valve replacement. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2017;24(1):48-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw303
  9. Manouguian S, Seybold-Epting W. Patch enlargement of the aortic valve ring by extending the aortic incision into the anterior mitral leaflet. New operative technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979;78:402-412.
  10. Nishimura RA, et al. AHA/ACC Valvular Heart Disease Guideline. 2014;109-116.
  11. Nicks R, Cartmill T, Bernstein L. Hypoplasia of the aortic root. The problem of aortic valve replacement. Thorax. 1970;25:339-346.
  12. Nielsen PH, Hjortdal V, Modrau IS, et al. Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:6:1705-1710. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv432
  13. Oliveira JL, Arnoni RT, Santos M.A, et al. Long-term mortality predictors in patients with small aortic annulus undergoing aortic valve replacement with a 19- or 21-mm bioprosthesis. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;31:4:275-280. https://doi.org/10.5935/1678-9741.20160060
  14. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart. 2006;92:1022-1029. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2005.067363
  15. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation. 2009;119:1034-1048. https://doi.jrg/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.778886
  16. Correia PM, Gonçalo F, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing aortic root enlargement for insertion of a larger prosthesis. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2016;50(1):82-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv487
  17. Prifti E, Bonacchi M, Ademaj F, et al. Early and mid-term outcome in terms of functional and hemodynamic performance of the st. Jude regent 19-mm aortic mechanical prosthesis versus 19-mm carpentieredwards aortic biological prosthesis. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2015;10:154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-015-0361-3
  18. Rao V, Christakis GT, Sever J, et al. A novel comparison of stentless versus stented valves in the small aortic root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:431-436.
  19. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 1978;58:1:20-24.
  20. Rubio AJ, Sierra QJ, Vega FM, et al. Up to twenty-five-year survival after aortic valve replacement with size 19 mm valves. Interactive Cardio Vascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2010;10:32-36. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2009.209197
  21. Sommers KE, David TE. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:1608-1612.
  22. Sеnage T, Thierry Le Tourneau, Foucher Y, et al. Early structural valve deterioration of mitroflow aortic bioprosthesis mode, incidence, and impact on outcome in a large cohort of patients. Circulation. 2014;130:2012-2020. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010400
  23. You JH, Jeong DS, Sung K, Kim WS, et al. Aortic valve replacement with Carpentier—Edwards: hemodynamic outcomes for the 19-mm valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:6:2209-2216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.11.016
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.