The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

I.I. Suvorov

Kafedra fakul'tetskoĭ khirurgii SPb GMU im. akad. I.P. Pavlova MZSR RF;
Gorodskoĭ Tsentr sovremennykh khirurgicheskikh tekhnologiĭ 31-ĭ klinicheskoĭ bol'nitsy, Sankt-Peterburg

S.A. Makarov

Kafedra fakul'tetskoĭ khirurgii SPb GMU im. akad. I.P. Pavlova MZSR RF;
Gorodskoĭ Tsentr sovremennykh khirurgicheskikh tekhnologiĭ 31-ĭ klinicheskoĭ bol'nitsy, Sankt-Peterburg

M.V. Li

Kafedra fakul'tetskoĭ khirurgii SPb GMU im. akad. I.P. Pavlova MZSR RF;
Gorodskoĭ Tsentr sovremennykh khirurgicheskikh tekhnologiĭ 31-ĭ klinicheskoĭ bol'nitsy, Sankt-Peterburg

Comparative analysis of outcomes and complications of minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors:

I.I. Suvorov, S.A. Makarov, M.V. Li

More about the authors

Journal: Endoscopic Surgery. 2013;19(1): 23‑26

Views: 303

Downloaded: 3

To cite this article:

Suvorov II, Makarov SA, Li MV. Comparative analysis of outcomes and complications of minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopic Surgery. 2013;19(1):23‑26. (In Russ.)

Recommended articles:
Robot-assisted cholecystectomy in children. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2023;(6):82-88
Implementation of the «safe cholecystectomy» program in the Leni­ngrad Region. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2023;(10):109-116
Intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by endo­scopic ultrasound. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2024;(1):6-11

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation



We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.