BACKGROUND

The group of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas, according to the World Health Organization Classification, in addition to Ewing’s sarcoma (ES), includes round cell sarcoma with rearrangement of the EWSR1 gene with partners not from the ETS gene family, sarcoma with BCOR gene alterations, CIC -rearranged sarcoma. Despite the fact that all tumors have clear histological and immunological criteria, their diagnosis can be difficult, given the fact that there are overlapping variants of the morphological picture and immunophenotype both within the group and with other round cell tumors.

OBJECTIVE

Present a comparative analysis of genetically verified ES, sarcoma with BCOR gene alterations and CIC-rearranged sarcoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comparative study of biopsy specimens of bones, soft tissues and internal organs was carried out in 118 patients with ES, 10 with BCOR gene alterations and 8 with CIC-rearranged sarcomas. All cases were genetically verified. The following research methods were used: histological, immunohistochemical, RT-PCR, RNA sequencing and FISH.

RESULTS

Within our cohort, it was shown that ES predominantly affects bones, while soft tissue localization is more typical for the other two undifferentiated round cell sarcomas. Histologically, in the overwhelming majority of cases, ES is characterized by a monomorphic round-cell structure; on the contrary, heterogeneous structure is typical for sarcoma with alterations of the BCOR gene, CIC-rearranged sarcoma. High sensitivity and specificity of CD99/NKX2.2 co-expression for ES, BCOR/SATB2/TLE1 for sarcoma with BCOR gene alterations, high specificity and low sensitivity of WT1/ETV4 co-expression for CIC-rearranged sarcoma was shown.

CONCLUSION

For the differential diagnosis of undifferentiated round-cell sarcomas, it is necessary to take into account the clinical, morphology when compared with the data of the IHC study, and verification by molecular genetic methods is necessary to improve the accuracy of diagnosis.