The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.
«Cavernous angiomas» of the brainstem. Clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment results
Journal: Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2020;84(2): 5‑21
Read: 19187 times
To cite this article:
Abbreviations
CA — cavernous angioma
KS — Karnofsky scale
MRI — magnetic resonance imaging
CT — computed tomography
INM — intraoperative neuromonitoring
Cavernomas of the brain stem are allocated as a separate group among all cavernous angiomas of the central nervous system due to significant tendency to recurrent hemorrhage and difficult surgical treatment associated with high risk of clinical deterioration [1—7]. In recent decades, development of magnetic resonance diagnosis and improvement of microsurgical equipment ensured increased number of patients with this disease and amount of operations. However, an approach to choosing treatment strategy and analysis of treatment outcomes has not fundamentally changed to date [1, 4, 7—11]. This is confirmed by at least the fact that the classification of J. Zabramski et al. (1994) is still used in the literature [12, 13]. This classification unifies true cavernomas, chronic hematomas and consequences of previous hemorrhages under the term “cavernous angioma of the brainstem”. Imperfection of this classification has led to the fact that treatment outcomes are evaluated without consideration of heterogeneity of disease. This features do not allow to determine the correct conclusions and formulate accurate indications for surgery or medication.
There is significant experience of surgical and conservative treatment of patients with cavernous angioma of the brainstem gained at the Burdenko Neurosurgery Center over previous 30 years. Analysis of this material allows us to present our own view on classification, features of natural course of disease and treatment of this pathology.
There were 515 patients with cavernous angioma of the brainstem for the period from January 1986 to December 2017. Surgery was performed in 322 cases, conservative management — in 193 cases. This research is based on prospective and retrospective analysis of symptoms, MRI/CT data and early postoperative results in 301 patients with CA (until December 2016). Long-term outcomes were studied in 187 patients who were examined and/or operated in 2000—2010. Selection of patients was determined by follow-up period over 5 years and possibility of regular monitoring with assessment of neurological status and MRI data. We excluded patients from remote regions of the Russian Federation or foreign countries due to difficult analysis of reliable prospective data.
Age of patients was 1—69 years (mean 31 years), 19% of patients were under 16 years old. Females prevailed (p<0.05).
Examination included analysis of medical records, neurological status at all stages of treatment and follow-up period, neuroimaging (CT, MRI) at different stages of disease and treatment. Intraoperative findings and biopsy data were evaluated. We compared neurological status and KS scores prior to surgery, in early postoperative and long-term periods. Regression of symptoms and timing of recurrent hemorrhages were estimated.
Features of classification and radiological diagnosis
We distinguished 2 main groups after analysis of CT/MRI in comparison with intraoperative data and results of biopsy:
1. Hematomas (subacute, chronic) without MR signs of vascular malformation (n=191);
2. Cavernous angiomas verified by MRI with signs of hemorrhage or without hemorrhage (n=131).
Hematomas without MR signs of vascular malformations (n=191)
Features of MRI and CT scans in this group varied depending on duration of hemorrhage. For example, subacute hemorrhage (2 weeks—1.5 months) was characterized by hyperintense CT focus and T1/T2WI scans with ring-shaped focal hyperintense signal and perifocal edema (Fig. 1a—c).


In this group, vascular malformation was confirmed intraoperatively and after biopsy. Malformation was confirmed only in 44% of cases. In other patients (56%), malformation was not detected. Apparently, it was due to small dimensions of malformation and/or its destruction after hemorrhage. CAs were histologically confirmed only in a third of malformations. The majority was AVMs and undifferentiated vascular malformations.
Cavernous angiomas verified by MRI (n=131)
There was heterogeneously changed signal on TI and T2WIs. Isointense signal on TIWI with perifocal ring of hypointense signal on T2WI (Fig. 3a)

In case of hemorrhage, typical CA with adjacent focus of changed signal corresponding to subacute or chronic hematoma (hemorrhage outside of malformation) was detected. In another variant, area of changed signal was characterized by several (≤2—3) adjacent to each other hyperintense foci (hemorrhage into malformation) (Fig. 4a, b).

In all cases, CA was confirmed after histological examination.
Clinical manifestations
In most cases (92%), the disease was clearly manifested after hemorrhage. Neurological symptoms of hemorrhage (with extremely rare exceptions) developed on the background of intact consciousness. More than half of the patients (64%) experienced the first hemorrhage after no previous symptoms. In other patients, various precursors preceded the first hemorrhage for several years: headache, dizziness, transient neurological symptoms or combination of these signs. Presumably, these symptoms may be explained by microhemorrhage and/or thrombosis inside the malformation.
We identified two clinical types of hemorrhage depending on the nature and rate of neurological impairment:
1. Stroke-like course: acute or subacute symptoms of brain stem lesion. Neurological aggravation developed over a short period of time (up to 1 week) and was followed by further stabilization. Timing of stabilization ranged from few days to a month. Subsequent gradual regression of symptoms was followed by partial or (less often) complete remission.
2. Pseudotumorous course: slow progression of symptoms of brainstem lesion for several weeks (sometimes months). Nevertheless, stabilization and even partial regression of symptoms ensued in long-term period (after a month or later).
Structure of focal syndrome was determined by localization of lesion and included signs of damage to the nuclei of cranial nerves and pathways. Syndromes of pontine lesion prevailed due to the most frequent localization of hematomas and/or CA in this zone of the brainstem (Table 1).

Clinical course of disease was characterized by certain features in each of these groups. For example, hemorrhage was the first and single in the majority (77%) of patients with hematomas without MR signs of malformations. Large hematoma often occupying the base and tegmentum of the brain stem determined extremely severe state of most patients (mean KS score 30—50). Recurrent hemorrhages were characteristic for patients with MRI-confirmed CA. The majority of patients (92%) have suffered several hemorrhages by the moment of surgery. However, their certain limit should be emphasized. In our sample, there were 3—4 hemorrhages with clear symptoms (even in case of long duration of disease). Five recurrent hemorrhages were observed only in 1% of cases that was the maximum in our patients (Tables 2, 3).


Probably, this phenomenon is caused by thrombosis and sclerosis of malformation cavities. There were no clear symptoms of hemorrhage in 8% of patients with CA. Gradual neurological deterioration in these cases was most likely due to changes in cavernoma per se associated with impaired venous outflow and enlargement. Patients with CA were characterized by less severe neurological symptoms compared to those with hematoma. KS score less than 60—70 was rare even in acute period of hemorrhage and progressive neurological deterioration (Table 4).

Features of surgical treatment
We assessed the following factors in selecting patients for surgical treatment: clinical severity; volume of hemorrhage; number of previous hemorrhages; surgical availability of CA, i.e. its proximity to the brainstem surface. The main indications for surgery were the following:
1. Subacute or chronic brainstem hematomas accompanied by severe neurological symptoms;
2. Brainstem CA followed by hemorrhage and severe neurological deficit;
3. Surgically available (adjacent to the brainstem surface) CA outside the hemorrhage stage, but with recurrent previous hemorrhages followed by progression of symptoms of brainstem lesion.
All operations were performed under intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (INM). It was either direct stimulation of the brainstem nuclei in approach through the 4th ventricle or transcranial motor pathway stimulation during manipulations near the brainstem. Both methods were combined in patients with extensive hematomas of the base and tegmentum of the brainstem. Somatosensory evoked potentials were used less frequently for INM due to complexity and low informative value of this method.
INM required an appropriate anesthetic management at the stages of initiation and continuation of anesthesia. During intubation, we used depolarizing muscle relaxants and moderate dose of non-depolarizing muscle relaxants. Further anesthesia maintenance was carried out by infusion of propofol (20—50 ml/h) or fentanyl (10 ml/hour).
Removal of hematoma and/or malformation was made within the closest contact of hematoma or malformation with the brainstem surface. We planned surgical approach as a line passing through the point on the brainstem surface closest to the malformation or hematoma and through their center.
Midline suboccipital craniotomy with an approach through the 4th ventricle was more common because the majority of hematomas and vascular malformations were subependymal and localized near pontine tegmentum. Dissection of rhomboid fossa was always carried out within the "safe" zones (suprafacial, infrafacial triangle, etc.). However, mapping of the fourth ventricle floor was an important stage of surgery. This procedure ensured navigation in the brainstem structures in case of severe hemorrhage-related deformation and manipulations away from the cranial nerve nuclei. It should be noted that this method is also not reliable enough, especially for facial nerve function monitoring. In our sample, early postoperative facial nerve paralysis developed in one third of cases despite preserved "M-response" in intraoperative electrical stimulation after resection of malformation. Perhaps, contraction of facial musculature was caused by stimulation of distal root, while nucleus per se and/or proximal root were intraoperatively damaged.
This approach was the most acceptable even for large hematomas occupying almost the entire brainstem cross section due to its simplicity and less traumatic nature compared to other approaches.
We have performed suboccupital craniotomy only in patient's prone position for the last 9 years in order to prevent complications such as intraoperative massive air embolism. We did not dissect the lower parts of cerebellar vermis at the intracranial stage and used telovelar approach so that the axis of surgical manipulations was as close to the optimal one as possible (i.e. passed through the above-mentioned points). This approach implied dissection of the fissure between the upper parts of amygdala and cerebellar tongue followed by separation of the vascular layer up to superior medullary velum. These manipulations ensured exposure of almost the entire half of the rhomboid fossa on the side of lesion. However, we preferred an approach from the ventrolateral surface of the brainstem if deep hematoma did not adhere to the brainstem surface, especially to the fourth ventricle floor, and symptoms of brainstem lesion were minimal. This approach was useful to avoid postoperative neurological deterioration, in particular symptoms of pontine tegmentum nuclei lesion. Far-lateral, retrolabyrinthine, presigmoid, subtemporal and anterior transpetrous approaches were predominantly used. Retrosigmoid suboccipital approach was rarer in our practice. Indeed, angle of attack of this approach did not allow dissection of the hematoma cavity or CA for total resection. Presigmoid or transmastoid retrolabyrinthine approach was more common for lesion of ventrolateral parts of the pons and medulla oblongata. Subtemporal craniotomy combined with anterior transpetrous approach was used for lesion of pontomesencephalic zone.
Subtentorial-supracerebellar or suboccipital transtentorial approach was used for removal of hematoma and/or vascular malformation of the midbrain. Pterional craniotomy and approach through the anterior parts of Sylvian fissure were applied in certain cases if hematoma or CA adhered to the brainstem surface within the interpeduncular cistern.
In all cases, selection of surgical approach was strictly individualized and determined by MRI data.
Intracranial stage of removal of hematoma or malformation implied a small incision of the brainstem either in the area of maximal lesion due to hemorrhage or CA attachment of the brain stem surface or in the area associated with minimal functional damage after incision. We used safe approaches through the brainstem described by various authors. Debridement of hematoma (liquid part and clots) was performed through this incision. In case of chronic hematomas, we tried to resect totally its capsule. In some patients, dissection of immature capsule was associated with advanced trauma of surrounding brain matter. Careful coagulation of residual capsule fragments was necessary to prevent subsequent hemorrhages. CA was fragmented and resected in pieces. It was unacceptable to resect cavernous malformation in “en bloc” fashion due to high risk of damage to surrounding brain matter. Dissection of malformation into the fragments was almost never accompanied by bleeding due to low blood flow in the cavernoma. We observed intraoperative bleeding associated with removal of hematoma or CA in only 6% of cases. This complication was caused by micro-AVM. Intensive arterial bleeding could be stopped only after complete coagulation and dissection of abnormal vessels.
A thorough coagulation of vessels in glial tissue around CA or hematoma is always considered as an important and necessary surgical stage. However, it should be remembered that CA may be combined with venous malformations in 20—30% of cases [5, 14—16]. It is believed that occlusion of the venous component of malformation can result delayed neurological symptoms due to venous infarction [9, 12]. Considering our experience, we cannot confirm this statement. In our sample, we had to coagulate veins within the malformation several times. However, severe neurological deterioration was observed only in 2 patients with lesion of tegmentum of the midbrain.
Early outcomes of surgical treatment
Early postoperative clinical improvement was common after debridement of hematoma. Overall postoperative KS score was increased among the entire sample of patients with hematomas and no MR signs of malformation (from 50 scores prior to surgery to 60 scores after surgery). On the contrary, patients with CA were characterized by reduced KS score from 70 to 50 points immediately after surgery (Fig. 5a, b).

Early postoperative regression of neurological symptoms was noted in 77% of patients with subacute hematomas and in 59% of patients with chronic hematomas. Neurological aggravation was observed only in 8% and 18% of cases, respectively. Postoperative outcomes were less favorable in patients undergoing surgery for CA with hemorrhage. Deterioration of symptoms occurred in 33% of patients, regression of symptoms — 27% of cases. Resection of CA outside the hemorrhage stage resulted unfavorable early postoperative outcome in the majority of cases. Deterioration of symptoms occurred in 73% of patients, regression — only in 5% of patients (Fig. 6).

Previous recurrent hemorrhages in patients with CA did not significantly affect the risk of postoperative aggravation of symptoms of brainstem lesion. However, these events reduced the probability of regression of symptoms from 36% to 16%. Apparently, the latter is explained by irreversible changes in the brainstem structures associated with recurrent hemorrhages.
Long-term outcomes of surgical treatment
Gradual clinical improvement in long-term postoperative period was observed in most patients (85%). This was true for patients with early postoperative regression of symptoms and for those with initial neurological aggravation or no changes early after surgery (in these cases, improvement was usually observed in 3—4 weeks after surgery) (Fig. 7).

The most significant regression of symptoms was found in patients with hematomas. Significant clinical improvement was confirmed in 6 months after surgery compared to preoperative and early postoperative status. Up to 57% of patients became actually healthy and returned to good quality of life (KS score 80—100), while 70% of patients were bedridden and needed intensive therapy prior to surgery (KS score ≤50). Surgery for CA associated with hemorrhage was followed by subtotal regression of symptoms in 35% of patients (KS score 90—100). Importantly, hemorrhagic component prevailed over the malformation in all these patients and preoperative KS score was 50—60. Improvement was less significant if malformation tissue prevailed over the volume of hematoma (preoperative KS score 60—70 and 80 scores in the follow-up). Thus, the main important aspect in patients with CA undergoing surgery outside the hemorrhage stage is significant clinical improvement through the follow-up period compared to early postoperative period. However, recovery takes place, at best, only up to preoperative level.
Recurrent hemorrhages in long-term postoperative period
Overall incidence of recurrent hemorrhages was 15%. Mean hemorrhage-free postoperative period was 3 years (from 2 weeks to 4 years). Redo surgery was required in the majority of patients (92%).
Recurrent hemorrhages occurred in 20% of patients with hematoma within 2 weeks—1 year (mean 6 months) after surgery. The following aspects caused hemorrhages:
1. Development of CA after debridement of subacute hematoma (14% of patients with subacute hematomas), while there were no signs of malformation according to MRI data, intraoperative data and histological examination of specimens (Fig. 8a, b, c);

2. Hematoma capsule remnants and their abnormal vessels. In our sample, these recurrent hemorrhages occurred in 23% of patients.
Recurrent hemorrhage and redo surgery were followed by deterioration of neurological deficit with subsequent partial regression.
Case report
A 62-year-old patient K. suffered from pulsating headache in cervical-occipital region for a long time. Unsteady gait and diplopia occurred in April 2006. These symptoms were characterized by gradual aggravation for 2 months. Left-sided numbness and weakness in the left arm and leg occurred for this time. MRI revealed a hematoma of tegmentum of the midbrain (Fig. 9a).

In the group of MRI-verified CA, recurrent postoperative hemorrhages occurred only in 2% of patients within 2—36 months (mean 15 months). It is noteworthy that all these patients were operated on the background of hemorrhage from malformation, and only hematoma was resected. Residual CA caused recurrent hemorrhage. Unfortunately, redo surgery was not followed by total resection of malformation. However, hemorrhage did not occur again in the majority of these patients. Active growth of malformation followed by recurrent hemorrhages was observed only in 2 cases that required redo surgery.
Case report
A 49-year-old patient S. The disease manifested in January 2009. Increased blood pressure was followed by headache in the cervical-occipital region, nausea, dizziness and unsteady gait. Acute neurological symptoms aggravated for the following week. Right-sided numbness including the face has occurred for this time. MRI revealed a pontine hematoma (Fig. 10a).

Thus, incorrect surgical approach at the first surgery did not allow total resection of malformation that was followed by further growth and recurrent hemorrhages in long-term postoperative period. Redo surgery was more traumatic due to predominance of malformation over hemorrhage that led to neurological deterioration.
Importantly, postoperative recurrent hemorrhages were absent in patients who underwent resection of CA outside the stage of hemorrhage. At the same time, partial resection of malformation took place in 11% of cases.
Outcomes of conservative treatment (n=193)
Conservative management was chosen in the following cases:
1. Significant regression of neurological symptoms by the moment of examination or their initial minimal severity;
2. Small hematomas (MRI data);
3. High risk of postoperative neurological deterioration;
4. No substrate for neurosurgery (hemorrhage resorption by the moment of consultation).
Usually, two or even three factors were combined to make a decision in favor of conservative treatment.
The majority (79%) of patients had CA without MR sings of hemorrhage at admission. In 22% of cases, no clinical symptoms of hemorrhage were observed throughout the disease. Acute symptoms of hemorrhage regressed almost completely within 2.3 months in 78% of cases and KS score was 90—100 by the moment of examination. Single hemorrhagic event was observed in 83% of cases, recurrent hemorrhage — only in 27% of patients.
Considering significant regression of neurological symptoms, conservative management was preferred in 8% of patients with moderate chronic hematomas (2—3 mm3) despite their persistence. KS score was 80 by the moment of examination. Slow improvement of neurological symptoms has continued for 1.5 years of the follow-up. However, there was no complete regression of neurological syndrome in any patient. Persistent residual syndrome of neurological deficit did not significantly hinder social adaptation in any case (KS score 90).
In 13% of cases, primary consultation was carried out after complete resorption of hemorrhage (after 8—12 months). Thus, only hypointense focus was observed in T2WIs (hemosiderin). Subtotal remission was observed in these patients (KS score 90—100).
Recurrent hemorrhages were observed in 9% of patients throughout the entire follow-up period. Conservative therapy was effective in most of them (66%) and resulted complete regression of minor neurological symptoms within a month. These were patients with CA as a rule. Recurrent hemorrhage required surgical intervention in one third of the patients (28%). These were patients who had initially been counselled at the stage of hemorrhage resorption. CA was intraoperative revealed in all patients. Subsequent biopsy confirmed this diagnosis.
Radiosurgery was applied in 6% of patients with MRI-verified CA. This approach did not essentially affect the further course of disease. Mean hemorrhage-free period was 3 years after radiosurgery in all patients. Mean follow-up period was 6 years (range 4—10). Clear symptoms of recurrent hemorrhage with subsequent partial regression were observed in these patients throughout the follow-up period in addition to multiple minor hemorrhages (Fig. 11a, b).

The problem of the brainstem CA is complex and multifaceted. In this manuscript, we will focus only on the main aspects of this disease from our point of view.
The first and, perhaps, the most important aspect that we would like to consider is a heterogeneous form of disease. According to the currently adopted classification, this form is determined by general term "brainstem CA" in the literature.
Considering our analysis of more than 500 cases, we distinguish two fundamentally different groups:
1. Hematomas (subacute, chronic) caused by hemorrhage from vascular micromalformations, including CA, without MR confirmation.
2. Typical MRI-verified CA with or without hemorrhage.
Fundamental between-group differences are determined by characteristics of MRI signal, course of disease and postoperative outcomes.
Hematoma is characterized by more severe neurological symptoms at the stage of hemorrhage and severe clinical condition at the moment of surgery (KS score 50 for subacute hematomas and 60 scores for chronic hematomas). At the same time, CA is characterized by more favorable course and KS score does not drop below 70 points even at the stage of hemorrhage. Moreover, CA outside the stage of hemorrhage may be accompanied by normal clinical condition (KS score 80—90). The number of preoperative hemorrhages also varies in these groups (1 or rarely 2 hemorrhages in case of hematoma, 3—4 clear episodes of hemorrhage in CA patients).
Postoperative outcomes directly depend on the substrate of disease. Early postoperative improvement is common after debridement of hematoma. In total, the whole group of patients with hematomas is characterized by gradual postoperative clinical improvement. On the contrary, postoperative deterioration with reduced KS score is observed in patients with CA. Thus, early postoperative regression of neurological symptoms was noted in 77% of patients with acute hematoma, 59% of those with chronic hematoma. Clinical deterioration occurred only in 8% and 18% of cases, respectively. Surgery for CA associated with hemorrhage resulted less favorable outcomes: postoperative exacerbation of symptoms — 33% of patients, regression of symptoms — only in 27% of cases. Resection of CA outside the hemorrhage is followed by unfavorable outcomes as a rule: postoperative exacerbation of symptoms — 73% of patients, regression of symptoms — only 5%.
What is the cause of hemorrhage into the brainstem followed by hematoma? It is a rupture of brainstem micromalformations which are not detected by MRI. Moreover, according to our data, intraoperative and histological verification is possible only in 44% of cases. CAs made up only a third of these malformations. In other cases, these are either micro-AVM or non-differentiated abnormal vessels.
Why the hemorrhages caused by micromalformations without MR confirmation are followed by more severe course compared with those from typical CA? It is most likely due to blood flow velocity inside the malformation. In case of telangiectasia and micro-AVM, hemorrhage occurs under higher pressure compared with CA rupture characterized by significantly reduced blood flow velocity.
Why vascular lesion is diagnosed only in some patients with brainstem hematoma? There are several potential reasons: small dimension of malformation, its destruction at the moment of hemorrhage, intraoperative cautery or aspiration during debridement of hematoma. Abnormal vessels may be observed in the hematoma capsule after partial resection or if resection of this capsule was not performed. Abnormal vessels which were not intraoperatively identified and resected can later cause recurrent hemorrhages. In our sample, these hemorrhages occurred in 20% of patients with hematoma in 2.5 years after surgery.
Thus, we would like to emphasize once again that hemorrhage into the brainstem may be caused by different types of vascular malformations including micro-AVM. MRI may be ineffective to detect these malformations. Moreover, resection of these structures may be very difficult (stop bleeding). We have encountered with these complications in some cases (6%).
The second question is no less important than the first one. Is resection of hematoma and/or CA associated with complete prevention of further hemorrhage?
Unfortunately, our experience has shown that surgery ensures clinical improvement in most cases. However, certain risk of recurrent hemorrhage is still observed. This is especially true for patients with hematomas and no MRI-verified CA. Risk of recurrent hemorrhage is observed in 20% of patients within a year after surgery if malformation was not visualized and/or completely excised, the hematoma capsule was not resected or only partial resection was carried out. Surgical treatment is more effective for prevention of recurrent hemorrhage in patients with MRI-verified CA. Risk of recurrent hemorrhage is not very high and amounts to only 2% even in cases of partial resection of malformation.
Considering an analysis of the causes of recurrent hemorrhages, we distinguished several fundamental conclusions about surgical strategy:
1. In case of chronic hematoma, maximal resection of the capsule reduces the risk of subsequent hemorrhage;
2. A thorough examination of the cavity of subacute hematoma is indicated to identify possible malformation;
3. Total resection of malformation is advisable for CA associated with hemorrhage.
Recently, it is accepted that MRI within 72 hours after surgery is optimal to detect residual malformation. Early redo surgery with resection of malformation is indicated regardless of development of hemorrhage de novo [17].
The absence of recurrent hemorrhages after partial resection of CA outside the stage of hemorrhage seems paradoxical. Perhaps, this effect is due to postoperative sclerotic changes in the malformation or its initially low biological activity.
The third important issue is indications for surgical treatment.
One of the main objectives in the treatment of brainstem CA is prevention of subsequent hemorrhages. At the same time, risk of neurological deterioration or symptoms de novo should be minimal. In this regard, the choice of treatment strategy (surgery or medication) is always difficult [5; 9; 10; 12]. Doubts are caused, on the one hand, by confirmed likelihood of spontaneous remission [18] and, on the other, by the risk of postoperative neurological deterioration. According to the literature, the final strategy for each patient is currently determined considering the following parameters: period after the last hemorrhage, number of previous hemorrhages, preoperative clinical state of the patient and CA localization [1; 5; 9; 10; 12; 13; 17; 20].
In our opinion, surgery is advisable at the stage of hemorrhage in patients with MRI-verified CA and in those without clear MRI data on the cause of hematoma. Volume of hemorrhage determining clinical severity is an important factor for the final decision-making. Larger volume of hematoma is followed by more severe neurological deterioration and, accordingly, advisability of surgery is clearer.
CA resection outside the stage of hemorrhage or at the stage of resorption of hematoma is the most perilous since postoperative deterioration occurs in more than 2/3 of patients. In this regard, currently widespread in the literature indication for surgery based only on the number of previous hemorrhages is not entirely adequate. It is advisable to refrain from surgical treatment and prefer conservative approach if the patient suffered 2—3 previous hemorrhages and the optimal time for surgery (hematoma) is missed. Surgery may be considered in case of subsequent hemorrhage. Moreover, we observed only 3—4 recurrent hemorrhages even in patients with long-standing illness.
Localization of malformation and its accessibility for resection are also important factors for surgical approach in patients with brainstem CA. Resection of superficial malformations is more advisable compared with deep ones because the risk of neurological deterioration is less.
Obviously, long-term outcomes determine the effectiveness of surgical treatment and, accordingly, the choice of surgical strategy along with early postoperative results. Early postoperative dynamics of neurological symptoms is important for predicting the long-term outcome of surgical treatment in addition to the substrate of disease (hematoma or cavernous angioma). In addition to patients with early postoperative regression of symptoms, the prospect is optimistic in patients with multidirectional postoperative neurological changes and in those with no early postoperative clinical changes. Long-term improvement in comparison with preoperative status is observed only in 1/3 of patients with early postoperative neurological deterioration.
Accurate analysis of the risk of subsequent hemorrhage is very important for choosing treatment strategy. To date, there are no objective criteria for risk assessment. Therefore, the question of assessing the "aggressiveness" of cavernous malformations is extremely relevant today. “Aggressiveness” markers indicating the tendency of malformation to subsequent hemorrhages can become leading parameters in choosing indications for surgery. According to the world literature, certain criteria are used today including annual incidence of hemorrhage per a patient and annual incidence of recurrent hemorrhages per a patient (before or after treatment). However, these criteria are rather conditional and unreliable [17; 20—22].
We also would like to emphasize that, in our opinion, the pathology currently determined as "cavernous angioma" in the literature is not strictly local. In addition to malformation as a cause of hemorrhage per se, multiple small abnormal vessels (telangiectasias) in subependymal and surrounding glial tissue are intraoperatively visualized in patients with cavernoma and/or hematoma (Fig. 12).

1. “Cavernous angiomas of the brain stem” is a heterogeneous pathology combining “classical” cavernomas and hematomas caused by a rupture of cavernoma and other vascular malformations without MR confirmation (telangiectasia, undifferentiated vascular malformation, micro-AVM).
2. The course of disease, clinical and radiological manifestations and treatment outcomes are different in these patients.
3. Surgery is indicated for hematomas without MRI-verified cause of hemorrhage. The main objective is a thorough examination of the walls of hematoma to detect the malformation and resect its capsule in case of chronic hemorrhage. Surgery is also indicated for CA outside the stage of hemorrhage and persistent neurological symptoms. Surgery may be indicated for CA outside the stage of hemorrhage in case of progressive neurological deterioration and availability of malformation for resection.
4. Conservative management is justified for CA outside the stage of hemorrhage and advisable in patients with CA accompanied by hemorrhage in case of regression or initially mild neurological symptoms regardless of previous hemorrhages.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The report is based on multiple years of experience of the Burdenko Neurosurgery Center in surgery of the brainstem CA. MR-features of these structures and intraoperative findings were compared with early and long-term postoperative outcomes in 322 patients and results of conservative treatment in 193 patients. The authors determined the statements, which raise understanding of the treatment of brainstem CA at the new level. Thus, they justified the indications for surgery or conservative management considering morphological features of CA, clinical manifestations and surgical accessibility.
The authors determine surgical strategy distinguishing two groups among heterogeneous forms of the brainstem CA: brainstem hematomas without MRI-verified malformations and MRI-verified cavernous angiomas with or without hemorrhage. Analysis of these groups is the first step in deciding in favor of surgery. Postoperative outcomes are better for large “hematomas”. At the same time, balanced approach is required for MRI-visible CA sinse postoperative outcomes are not so favorable in these patients. The next step in decision-making is based on clinical and tomographic comparisons. Analysis of these features allowed the authors to distinguish the variants of clinical course of the brainstem CA (stroke-like and pseudotumorous types). These types affect the rate of decision-making along with morphological features of CAs. The authors comprehensively described the third component of decision-making. This is surgical availability of cavernoma that is determined by the proximity of CA to the brainstem surface.
Therefore, the hierarchy of characteristics of the brainstem CA is essential to prefer surgery or conservative treatment. The recommendations for choosing the optimal approach to CA, the nuances of dissection and tough guidelines for fragmentary resection are valuable for surgeon. Indeed, en-bloc resection is associated with higher risk of postoperative neurological complications. Moreover, the recommendations for postoperative monitoring and resection of residual part of cavernoma after its diagnosis within 72 hours after surgery are also practically important.
The authors analyzed 193 patients and determined the criteria for conservative management of the brainstem CA. These criteria are also important for avoiding the unjustified risk of surgery and disability. The authors also consider the problematic aspects of the brainstem CAs. These are recurrent postoperative hemorrhages, relapses of cavernous angiomas (including those after resection of the brainstem CAs) and others.
Study design is based on comparative analysis of postoperative outcomes in patients with brainstem CA (n=322) depending on the diagnosis of hematoma (n=191) or MRI-verified CA (n=131). An analysis covers the entire “life period” of the cavernoma from initial clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment stage (surgery or conservative management) to early and long-term postoperative results. The authors analyzed early and long-term postoperative outcomes in a large sample of patients and reasonably concluded the best results of surgery in patients with brainstem hematomas and negative ones in cases of CA without hemorrhage. Sufficient clinical material allowed the authors to establish the role of the number of recurrent hemorrhages from the cavernoma in deciding “for” or “against” surgery. The researchers revealed their limit and no need for surgery if the number of recurrent hemorrhages exceeded this threshold.
The article leaves a vivid impression and will be very interesting for national and foreign neurosurgeons who are faced with this problem. The main provisions of the article may be described as groundbreaking, allow you to “reload” approaches to the treatment of brainstem CAs and understand the causes of earlier mistakes in the treatment.
L.Ya. Kravets (Nizhny Novgorod, Russia)
References:
Email Confirmation
An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.
Email Confirmation
We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.