The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Cherekaev V.A.

NII neĭrokhirurgii im. akad. N.N. Burdenko RAMN, Moskva

Gol'bin D.A.

NII neĭrokhirurgii im. akad. N.N. Burdenko RAMN, Moskva

Belov A.I.

FGBU "NII neĭrokhirurgii im. akad. N.N. Burdenko" RAMN

Radchenkov N.S.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia

Lasunin N.V.

FGBU "NII neĭrokhirurgii im. N.N. Burdenko" RAMN, Moskva

Vinokurov A.G.

Federal Clinical Research Center of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Orbitozygomatic approaches to the skull base

Authors:

Cherekaev V.A., Gol'bin D.A., Belov A.I., Radchenkov N.S., Lasunin N.V., Vinokurov A.G.

More about the authors

Journal: Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2015;79(4): 95‑101

Read: 3921 times


To cite this article:

Cherekaev VA, Gol'bin DA, Belov AI, Radchenkov NS, Lasunin NV, Vinokurov AG. Orbitozygomatic approaches to the skull base. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2015;79(4):95‑101. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro201579495-101

References:

  1. Galzio RJ, Tschabitscher M, Ricci A. Orbitozygomatic approach. In: Cappabianca P, Califano L, Iaconetta G. eds. Cranial, craniofacial and skull base surgery. Milano (Italy): Springer-Verlag Italia. 2010;61-86.
  2. Karagezov L. A new transcranial approach to the orbit. Vopr Neirokhir. 1967;1:5-7. In Russian.
  3. Jane J, Park Т, Pobereskin L. The supraorbital approach: technical note. Neurosurgery. 1982;11:537-542.
  4. McArthur L.L. Asseptic surgical access to the pituitary body and its neughborhood. J Am Med Ass. 1912;58:2009-2011.
  5. Frazier CH. An approach to the hypophysis through the anterior cranial fossa. Ann Surg. 1913;57:145-150.
  6. Al-Mefty O. The supraorbital pterional approach to skull base lesions. Neurosurgery. 1987;21:474-477.
  7. Al-Mefty O., Fox J. Superolateral orbital exposure and reconstruction. Surg Neurol. 1985;23:609-613.
  8. Fujitsu K., Kuwabara T. Zygomatic approach for lesions in the interpeduncular cistern. J Neurosurg. 1986;18:367-369.
  9. Lesoin F, Thomas CE, Villete L, Pellerin P, Jomin M. The midline supra–orbital approach, using a large single free bone flap. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1987;87:86-89.
  10. McDermott MW, Durity FA, Rootman J, Woodhurst WB. Combined frontotemporal–orbitozygomatic approach for tumors of the sphenoid wing and orbit. Neurosurgery. 1990;26:107-116.
  11. Pellerin P, Lesoin F, Dhellemmes P, Donazzan M, Jomin M. Usefulness of the orbitofrontomalar approach with bone reconstruction for frontotemporosphenoid meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 1984;15:715-718.
  12. Hakuba A, Lui S, Nishimura S. The orbitozygomatic infratemporal approach: a new surgical technique. Surg Neurol. 1986;26:271-276.
  13. Ikeda K, Yamashita J, Hashimoto M, Futami K. Orbitozygomatic temporopolar approach for high basilar aneurysm associated with a short intracranial internal carotid artery: a new surgical approach. Neurosurgery. 1991;28(1):105-110.
  14. Janecka IP, Sekhar LN. Anterior and anterolateral craniofacial resection. ln: Sekhar LN, Janecka IP. (eds.). Surgery of cranial base tumors. New York: Raven Press Ltd. 1993;147-156.
  15. Taguchi Y, Tanaka K, Matsuzava M, Sekino H. A surgical technique to avoid postoperative enophthalmos in the cranioorbital approach: technical note. J Neurosurg. 1996;85:515-517.
  16. Zabramski JM, Kiris T, Sankhla SK, Cabiol J, Spetzler RF. Orbitozygomatic craniotomy: technical note. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:336-341.
  17. Tanriover N., Ulm A.J., Rhoton A.L. Jr., Kawashima M., Yoshioka N., Lewis S.B. One-piece versus two-piece orbitozygomatic craniotomy: quantitative and qualitative considerations. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(ONS 4:Suppl 2):ONS229-237.
  18. Surgery of skull base tumors. Ed. by AN Konovalov. Moscow: Antidor 2004. In Russian.
  19. Shigeno T., Tanaka J., Atsuchi M. Orbitozygomatic approach by transposition of temporalis muscle and one-piece osteotomy. Surg Neurol. 1999;52:81-83. doi: 10.1016/S0090–3019(99)00047–6.
  20. Furth WR van, Agur AMR, Woolridge N, Cusimano MD. The orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery. 2005;58(ONS Suppl. 1):ONS103-ONS107. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000197050.70397.C1.
  21. Cherekaev VA, Shchekut’ev GA, Ogurtsova AA, Gol’bin DA, Smirnov RA. Intraoperative identification of the oculomotor, trochlear, and abducens nerves in surgery of infiltrative cranio-orbital tumors (a new technique). Vopr Neirokhir. 2010;3:31-37. In Russian.
  22. Cherekaev VA, Gol’bin DA, Belov AI, Borodin VV. Reconstruction of defects of the anterior and middle parts of the skull base using the advanced buccal fat pad. Vopr Neirokhir. 2010;4:3-10. In Russian.
  23. Cherekaev VA, Golbin DA, Belov AI. Translocated pedicled buccal fat pad: closure of anterior and middle skull base defects after tumor resection.
  24. Seckin H, Avci E, Uluc K, Niemann D, Baskaya MK. The work horse of skull base surgery: orbitozygomatic approach. Technique, modifications, and applications. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25:E4. doi: 10.3171/FOC.2008.25.12.E4.
  25. Youssef AS, Willard L, Downes A, Olivera R, Hall K, Agazzi S, Loveren H. van. The frontotemporal–orbitozygomatic approach: reconstructive technique and outcome. Acta Neurochir. 2012;154:1265-1283. doi: 10.1007/s00701–012–1370–9.
  26. Chung YS, Gwak HS, Jung HW, Paek SH, Kim DG, Choi KS. A cranio-orbital-zygomatic approach to dumbbell-shaped trigeminal neuromas using the petrous window. Skull Base. 2001;11(3):157-164. doi: 10.1055/s–2001–16603.
  27. Lemole GM, Henn JS, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Modifications to the orbitozygomatic approach. J Neurosurg. 2003;99:924-930. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.5.0924.
  28. Nanda A, Vannemreddy PSSV, Vincent DA. Microsurgical and endoscopic approaches to the basilar bifurcation: quantitative comparison of combined pterional/anterior temporal and orbitozygomatic approaches. Skull Base. 2001;11(2):93-97.
  29. Gonzalez LF, Crawford NR, Horgan MA, Deshmuck P, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Working area and angle of attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic, and maxillary extension of the orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery. 2002;50:550-557.
  30. Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM, Preul MC, Crawford NR, Siwanuwatn R, Spetzler RF. Quantitative anatomic study of three surgical approaches to the anterior communicating artery. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(ONS Suppl 2):ONS-397-ONS-405.
  31. Filipce V, Pillai P, Makiese O, Makiese O, Zarzour H, Pigott M, Ammirati M. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the working area obtained by endoscopie and microscope in various approaches to the anterior communicating artery complex using computed tomography-based frameless stereotaxy: a cadaver study. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:1147-1153. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000359328.90826.97.
  32. Gol’bin DA. Endoscopic assistance in surgery of tumors with the craniofacial spread: Candidate of Medicine Thesis. Moscow 2010. Available at: http://www.dissercat.com/content/endoskopi-cheskaya–assistentsiya–v–khirurgii–opukholei–kraniofatsialnogo– rasprostraneniya. In Russian. Link was active on 03.20.15.
  33. Du R, Young WL, Lawton MT. «Tangential» resection of medial temporal arteriovenous malformations with the orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(3):645-652. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000109043.56063.BA.
  34. Kinoshita M, Tanaka S, Nakada M, Ozaki N, Hamada J, Hayashi Y. What bone part is important to remove in accessing the suprachiasmatic region with less frontal lobe retraction in frontoteomporal craniotomies. World Neurosurgery. 2012;77:342-348.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.