The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Skvortsov I.A.

Scientific and Therapeutic Center for the Treatment and Prevention of Neuropsychiatric Disability

The priority and dominance of the organism in interaction with the environment

Authors:

Skvortsov I.A.

More about the authors

Journal: S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;124(11‑2): 5‑15

DOI: 10.17116/jnevro20241241125

Read: 632 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

THE PRIORITY AND DOMINANCE OF THE ORGANISM IN INTERACTION WITH THE ENVIRONMENT
THE PRIORITY AND DOMINANCE OF THE ORGANISM IN INTERACTION WITH THE ENVIRONMENT

To cite this article:

Skvortsov IA. The priority and dominance of the organism in interaction with the environment. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;124(11‑2):5‑15. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20241241125

Подписка 2026 Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. Спецвыпуски (S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry (special issues))
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Abstract:

In interaction with the environment, the most important role belongs to the body, its real ability at the moment to respond to environmental factors. The body itself «decides» which environmental factors should be used to respond, and which ones should be ignored or rejected, it chooses those factors to which the genetic program has prepared adequate reactions in advance. The body chooses and takes into account the environmental conditions necessary to solve its adaptation and development tasks. In the communication of an organism with the environment, the principle of combining and fighting two relatively opposite motivations operates — the tendency to integration and the tendency to autonomy, isolation, and preservation of one’s independence.

Keywords:

Intrauterine period
organism
external environment
command systems of neurons
expansion of functional systems to the environment
impressive and expressive functions of analyzers

Authors:

Skvortsov I.A.

Scientific and Therapeutic Center for the Treatment and Prevention of Neuropsychiatric Disability

Received:

09.10.2024

Accepted:

14.10.2024

Close metadata

References:

  1. Davydovsky IV. Problema pritchinnosti v meditsine. Aetiologiya. M., 1962. (In Russ.).
  2. Barabási AL. Dynamic scaling of coupled nonequilibrium interfaces. Phys Rev A. 1992;46(6):R2977-R2980. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.46.r2977
  3. Barabasi AL, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 1999;286(5439):509-512.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509
  4. Barabási AL. The architecture of complexity. Control Systems Magazine IEEE. 2007;27(4):33-42. 
  5. Polsky A, Mel BW, Schiller J. Computational subunits in thin dendrites of pyramidal cells. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(6):621-627.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1253
  6. Park J, Papoutsi A, Ash RT, et al. Contribution of apical and basal dendrites to orientation en-coding in mouse V1 L2/3 pyramidal neurons. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5372. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13029-0
  7. Tzilivaki A, Kastellakis G, Poirazi P. Challenging the point neuron dogma: FS basket cells as 2-stage nonlinear integrators. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3664. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11537-7
  8. Gidon A, Zolnik TA, Fidzinski P, et al. Dendritic action potentials and computation in human layer 2/3 cortical neurons. Science. 2020;367(6473):83-87.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax6239
  9. Poirazi P, Papoutsi A. Illuminating dendritic function with computational models. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020;21(6):303-321.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0301-7
  10. Skvortsov IA. Phenomen ekspansii funktsional’nyh system v neiroontogeneze. Almanh “Istselenie”. M.: Trivola. 2001. Vyp. 5. S. 9-13. (In Russ.).
  11. Reznikov KYu. Proliferatsiya kletok mozga pozvonochnyh v usloviyah nornalnogo razvitiya mozga i pri ego travme. M.: Nauka. 1981. 148 s. (In Russ.).
  12. Holley JA. Early development of the circumferential axonal pathway in mouse and chick spinal cord. J Comp Neurol. 1982;205(4):371-382.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902050406
  13. Rakic P. Neuronal-glial interaction during brain development. Trends Neurosci. 1981;4:184-187. 
  14. Jacobson M. A plentitude of neurons. Aspects of neurogenesis. N.Y.: Acad, press, 1974;2:154-169. 
  15. Levi-Montalcini R. The nerve growth factor: its role in growth, differentiation and function of the sympathetic adrenergic neuron. Prog Brain Res. 1976;45:235-258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60993-0
  16. Gladkovitch NG, Leontovitch TA, Lutshekina EA, Shuleikina KV. Kolichestvennaya morphologicheskaya characteristika razvivayutzhihsya neironov retikulyarnoi formatsii stvola. Neiro-filiologia. 1980;12:53-60. (In Russ.).
  17. Gladkovitch NG, Leontovitch TA, Lutshekina EA, Shuleikina KV. Dinamichaskie perestroiki geometrii dendritov razvivayutzhihsya trigeminal’nyh neironov v norme I pri ogranichenii sensornogo pritoka. Tez. XIY s’ezda Vsesoyuznogo fiziol. Obtzhestve. L.: Nauka, 1983, s. 169-170. (In Russ.).
  18. Shuleikina KV. Funktsional’nye svoistva razvivayutzheisya nervnoi kletki. Neiroontogenez. M.: Nauka. 1985, s. 127-198. (In Russ.).
  19. Jones DG. Quantitative investigations of development of synaptic junctions in neocortex. Neu-rosci Res Program Bull. 1982;20(4):461-471. 
  20. Mason CA. Development of terminal arbors of retino-geniculate axons in the kitten--I. Light microscopical observations. Neuroscience. 1982;7(3):541-559.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(82)90063-x
  21. Sokolov EN, Arakelov GG, Litvinov EG, I dr. Peismeikernyi potentsial neirona. Tbilisi: Metsniereba, 1975, 213 s. (In Russ.).
  22. Gladkovitch NG. Razvitie dendritov v norme I pri usloviyah deafferentatsii. V kn.: Neiroontogenez. M.: Nauka, 1985, s. 77-126. (In Russ.).
  23. Bradley P, Berry M. The effects of reduced climbing and parallel fibre input on Purkinje cell dendritic growth. Brain Res. 1976;109(1):133-51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(76)90384-x
  24. Whitehead MC. Growth of dendrites in the optic tectum of the chick embryo following destruction of the eye primordium. Neuroscience. 1979;4(3):379-390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(79)90101-5
  25. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169-192.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
  26. Rizzolatti, G. Understanding the action of others. In: N. Kanwisher & J. Duncan (Eds.). Func-tional neuroimaging of visual cognition: Attention and performance. Vol. XX. Oxford. NY: Oxford University Press. 2004.
  27. Uvnäs-Moberg K. Gastrointestinal hormones and pathophysiology of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1987;128:138-146.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00365528709090982
  28. Unvas-Moberg K. And Winberg J. Role for sensory stimulation in energy economy of mother and infant with particular regard to the gastrointestinal endocrine system. In textbook of gastrointesti-nal and nutrition in infancy. 1990, 2nd edition, edited by E. Lebenthal. Raven press.
  29. Andersen R. Mashina zhelanii. V mire nauki. 2019;5-6:56-64. (In Russ.).
  30. Hochberg LR, Bacher D, Jarosiewicz B, et al. Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature. 2012;485(7398):372-375.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11076
  31. Aflalo T, Kellis S, Klaes C, et al. Neurophysiology. Decoding motor imagery from the posterior parietal cortex of a tetraplegic human. Science. 2015;348(6237):906-910.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5417
  32. Flesher SN, Collinger JL, Foldes ST, et al. Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosen-sory cortex. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(361):361ra141. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8083
  33. Armenta Salas M, Bashford L, Kellis S, et al. Proprioceptive and cutaneous sensations in hu-mans elicited by intracortical microstimulation. Elife. 2018;7:e32904. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32904
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.