The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Mochalova E.G.

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia

Legostaeva L.A.

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia

Zimin A.A.

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia

Yusupova D.G.

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia

Sergeev D.V.

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia

Ryabinkina Yu.V.

Federal State budgetary scientific Institution «Research Centre of Neurology», Moscow

Bodien Y.

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Suponeva N.A.

Nauchnyĭ tsentr nevrologii RAMN, Moskva

Piradov M.A.

Federal State budgetary scientific Institution «Research Centre of Neurology», Moscow

The Russian version of Coma Recovery Scale-revised — a standardized method for assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness

Authors:

Mochalova E.G., Legostaeva L.A., Zimin A.A., Yusupova D.G., Sergeev D.V., Ryabinkina Yu.V., Bodien Y., Suponeva N.A., Piradov M.A.

More about the authors

Journal: S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2018;118(3‑2): 25‑31

DOI: 10.17116/jnevro20181183225-31

Read: 5388 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

THE RUSSIAN VERSION OF COMA RECOVERY SCALE-REVISED — A STANDARDIZED METHOD FOR ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DISORDERS OF CONSCIOUSNESS
THE RUSSIAN VERSION OF COMA RECOVERY SCALE-REVISED — A STANDARDIZED METHOD FOR ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DISORDERS OF CONSCIOUSNESS

To cite this article:

Mochalova EG, Legostaeva LA, Zimin AA, et al. . The Russian version of Coma Recovery Scale-revised — a standardized method for assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2018;118(3‑2):25‑31. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20181183225-31

Подписка 2026 Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. Спецвыпуски (S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry (special issues))
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Stealscore scale for asse­ssment of clinical symptoms of subclavian-vertebral artery steal syndrome. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;(6):677-681
The FOUR scale in inte­nsive care and reha­bilitation of patients with acute cere­bral injury. The first resu­lts of a two-stage study. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2025;(1):21-29
Abstract:

The authors officially present for the first time the Russian version of Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Today CRS-R is the only validated scale in Russian for assessment of patients with chronic disorders of consciousness (DOC). The study showed high consistency for different researchers, high sensitivity in the evaluation of patients over time as well as high concurrent validity. This article contains the text of the scale and recommendations how to use CRS-R and interpret the data. Presented version of the CRS-R is recommended for use in DOC patients. Russian version of the CRS-R is a standardized, comprehensive and systematic approach to the examination and assessment of patients with chronic DOS. It ensures the standard approach to examination and assessment that warrants the accuracy and homogeneity of the obtained results.

Keywords:

neurological examination
disorders of consciousness
minimaly conscious state
vegetative state
scale
Coma Recovery Scale-Revised
CRS-R

Authors:

Mochalova E.G.

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia

Legostaeva L.A.

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia

Zimin A.A.

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia

Yusupova D.G.

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia

Sergeev D.V.

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia

Ryabinkina Yu.V.

Federal State budgetary scientific Institution «Research Centre of Neurology», Moscow

Bodien Y.

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Suponeva N.A.

Nauchnyĭ tsentr nevrologii RAMN, Moskva

Piradov M.A.

Federal State budgetary scientific Institution «Research Centre of Neurology», Moscow

Close metadata

References:

  1. Piradov MA. Intensivnaya terapiya insul’ta: vzglyad na problemu. Annaly klinicheskoj i ehksperimental’noj nevrologii. 2007;1(1):17-22. (In Russ.)
  2. Potapov AA, Lihterman LB, Kravchuk AD, Kornienko VN, Zakharova NE, Oshorov AV, Filatova MM. Sovremennye podhody k izucheniyu i lecheniyu cherepno-mozgovoj travmy. Annaly klinicheskoj i ehksperimental’noj nevrologii. 2010;4(1):4-12. (In Russ.)
  3. Piradov MA, Ryabinkina YUV, Gnedovskaya EV, Suponeva NA, Prokazova PR. Sovremennye tekhnologii vedeniya pacientov v kriticheskom sostoyanii pri zabolevaniyah nervnoj sistemy. Pod red. MA Piradova, Tanashyan MM. Nevrologiya XXI veka: diagnosticheskie, lechebnye i issledovatel’skie tekhnologii. Rukovodstvo dlya vrachej. M.: ATMO; 2015. (In Russ.)
  4. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58(3):349-353. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.58.3.506
  5. Pisa FE, Biasutti E, Drigo D, Barbone F. The prevalence of vegetative and minimally conscious states: a systematic review and methodological appraisal. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. 2014;29(4):23-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182a4469f
  6. Zajcev OS. Psihopatologiya tyazheloj cherepno-mozgovoj travmy. M.: MEDpress-inform; 2011. (In Russ.)
  7. Bykova VI, Lukyanov VI, Fufaeva EV. Dialogue with the patient in low consciousness state after severe brain damages. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya. 2015;23(3):9-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2015230302
  8. Avezaat CJ, Braakman R, Maas AI. A scoring device for the level of consciousness: the Glasgow «coma» scale. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde. 1977;121(53):2117-2121.
  9. Wijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, Manno EM, McClelland RL. Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score. Annals of neurology. 2005;58(4):585-593. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20611
  10. Schnakers C, Giacino J, Kalmar K, Piret S, Lopez E, Boly M, Malone R Laureys S. Does the FOUR score correctly diagnose the vegetative and minimally conscious states? Annals of neurology. 2006;60(6):744-745. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20919
  11. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2004;85(12):2020-2029.
  12. Kalmar K, Giacino JT. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. 2005;15(3-4):454-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010443000425
  13. Seel RT, Sherer M. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine BI-ISIGDoCTF. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2010;91(12):1795-1813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.218
  14. Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC neurology. 2009;9:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-35
  15. Giacino JT, Kezmarsky MA, DeLuca J, Cicerone KD. Monitoring rate of recovery to predict outcome in minimally responsive patients. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1991;72(11):897-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(91)90008-7
  16. Giacino JT. The vegetative and minimally conscious states: consensus-based criteria for establishing diagnosis and prognosis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2004;19(4):293-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2011.07.009
  17. Sacco S, Altobelli E, Pistarini C, Cerone D, Cazzulani B, Carolei A. Validation of the Italian version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Brain injury. 2011;25(5):488-495. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2011.558043
  18. Schnakers C, Majerus S, Giacino J. A French validation study of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Brain injury. 2008;22(10):786-792. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050802403557
  19. Chatelle C, Bodien YG, Carlowicz C. Detection and Interpretation of Impossible and Improbable Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Scores. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2016;97(8):1295-1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.009
  20. Binder M, Gorska U, Wojcik-Krzemien A, Gociewicz K. A validation of the Polish version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRSR). Brain injury. 2018;32(2):242-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1406991
  21. Di H, He M, Zhang Y. Chinese translation of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. Brain injury. 2017;31(3):363-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2016.1255780
  22. Sattin D, Lovaglio P, Brenna G. A comparative study on assessment procedures and metric properties of two scoring systems of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised items: standard and modified scores. Clinical rehabilitation. 2017;31(9):1226-1237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215517694225
  23. Wannez S, Heine L, Thonnard M, Gosseries O, Laureys S. Coma Science Group. The repetition of behavioral assessments in diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Annals of neurology. 2017;81(6):883-889. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24962
  24. Guerit JM, Amantini A, Amodio P. Consensus on the use of neurophysiological tests in the intensive care unit: electroencephalogram, evoked potentials, and electroneuromyography. Neurophysiologie clinique. 2009; 39(2):71-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2009.03.002
  25. La Porta F, Caselli S, Ianes AB. Can we scientifically and reliably measure the level of consciousness in vegetative and minimally conscious States? Rasch analysis of the coma recovery scale-revised. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2013;94(3):527-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.035
  26. Lovstad M, Froslie KF, Giacino JT, Skandsen T, Anke A, Schanke AK. Reliability and diagnostic characteristics of the JFK coma recovery scale-revised: exploring the influence of rater’s level of experience. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. 2010;25(5):349-356. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181cec841
  27. Bodien YG, Carlowicz CA, Chatelle C, Giacino JT. Sensitivity and Specificity of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Total Score in Detection of Conscious Awareness. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2016;97(3):490-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.422
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.