The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Chernobelsky S.I.

Laboratory of Scientific Research on Phoniatrics (Head Candidate of Medical Sciences, Professor S.I. Chernobelsky) of the Siberian State Institute of Arts named after Dmitry Hvorostovsky

The use of visual feedback in the treatment of a deaf young man with puberphonia

Authors:

Chernobelsky S.I.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2024;89(4): 78‑80

Read: 839 times


To cite this article:

Chernobelsky SI. The use of visual feedback in the treatment of a deaf young man with puberphonia. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2024;89(4):78‑80. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20248904178

Recommended articles:

References:

  1. Prasansuk S. Prevention of hearing impairment and deafness. Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of the IALP. Cairo. 1995.
  2. Rakhmanova IV, Matroskin AG, Nozhnitskaya SYu, Kruglyakov AYu. The effect of SARS-CoV-2 on the auditory function of newborn children. Abstracts of the XXI Russian Congress on Otorhinolaryngology “Preobrazhensky Readings. Children’s otorhinolaryngology. Connection of times, connection of specialties”, dedicated to the 130th anniversary of the birth of Professor Boris Sergeevich Preobrazhensky. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2023;88(1):95-97. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20238801195
  3. Lane H, Wozniak Webster J. Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1991;89(2):859-866.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1894647
  4. Higgins MB, Carney AE, Schulte L. Physiological assessment of speech and voice production of adults with hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1994 June;37:510-521. PMID: 8084183. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3703.510
  5. Nickerson RS. Characteristics of the speech of deaf persons. Volta Review. 1975;77:342-362. 
  6. Abberton E, Fourcin A. Electrolaryngography. In: Code C, Ball M, eds. Experimental clinical phonetics. Investigatory techniques in speech pathology and therapeutics. London & Canberra: Croom Helm; 1984:62-78. 
  7. Luchikhin LA. The use of multimedia technologies in otorhinolaryngology. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2012;77(3):4-6. (In Russ).
  8. Barsties B, Beers M, Ten Cate L, Ballegooijen KV, Braam L, Groot MD, Van der Kant M, Kruitwagen C, Maryn Y. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology. 2017;42;(1):1-8.  https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2015.1091036
  9. Sivasankar M, Bayer J.J, Babu T, Larson CR. Voice responses to changes in pitch of voice or tone auditory feedback. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2005;117:850-857.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1849933
  10. Thorpe CW. Visual feedback of acoustic voice features in voice training. Proceedings of the 9th Australian International Conference on Speech Science & Technology. Melbourne, December 2 to 5, 2002. Australian Speech Science & Technology Association Inc.; 2002:349-354. 
  11. Snyder G, Strauss Hough M, Blanchet P, Ivy LJ, Waddell D. The effects of self-generated synchronous and asynchronous visual speech feedback on overt stuttering frequency. Journal of Communication Disorders. 2009;42(3):235-244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.02.002
  12. Hudock D, Dayaly V.N, Salruklarogly T, Stuart A, Zhang J, Kalinovsky J. Stuttering ingibition via visual feedback at normal and fast speech rates. Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. 2011;46;(2):169-178.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13682822.2010.490574
  13. Emmorey K, Bosforth R, Kraljic T. Visual feedback and self-monitoring of sign language. Journal of Memory and Language. 2009; 62(3):398-411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.001
  14. Emmorey K, Gertsberg N, Korpics F, Wright C. The influence of visual feedback and register changes on sign language production: A kinematic study with deaf signers. Applied Psycholinguistics. 2009;30(1):187-203.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408090085
  15. Dmitriev LB. Osnovy vokal’noj metodiki. 2-e izdanie. M.: Muzyka; 1996. (In Russ).

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.