The speech audiometry using the matrix sentence test

Boboshko M.Iu.

Laboratoriia slukha i rechi Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. akad. I.P. Pavlova

ORCID: 0000-0003-2453-523X

Zhilinskaya E.V.

Research Centre of I.P. Pavlov St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia, 197022

Warzybok A.

Medical Physics and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Carl-von-Ossietzky, University Oldenburg, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany

Mal'tseva N.V.

Laboratoriia slukha i rechi Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. akad. I.P. Pavlova

Zokoll M.

Medical Physics and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Carl-von-Ossietzky, University Oldenburg, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany

Kollmeier B.

Medical Physics and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Carl-von-Ossietzky, University Oldenburg, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany

The speech audiometry using the matrix sentence test

Authors:

Boboshko M.Iu., Zhilinskaya E.V., Warzybok A., Mal'tseva N.V., Zokoll M., Kollmeier B.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2016;81(5): 40‑44

DOI: 10.17116/otorino201681540-44

Downloaded: 53

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Boboshko MIu, Zhilinskaya EV, Warzybok A, Mal'tseva NV, Zokoll M, Kollmeier B. The speech audiometry using the matrix sentence test. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2016;81(5):40‑44. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201681540-44

Подписка 2025 (Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology)

Close metadata

The matrix sentence test in which the five-word semantically unpredictable sentences presented under the background noise conditions are used as the speech material was designed and validated for many languages. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the Russian version of the matrix sentence test (RuMatrix test) in the listeners of different ages with normal hearing. At the first stage of the study, 35 listeners at the age from 18 to 33 year were examined. The results of the estimation of the training effect dictated the necessity of conducting two training tracks before carrying out the RuMatrix test proper. The signal-to-noise ratio at which 50% speech recognition (SRT50) was obtained was found to be –8.8±0.8 dB SNR. A significant effect of exposure to the background noise was demonstrated: the noise level of 80 and 75 Db SPL led to a considerably lower intelligibility than the noise levels in the range from 45 to 70 dB SPL; in the subsequent studies, the noise level of 65 dB SPL was used. The high test-retest reliability of the RuMatrix test was proved. At the second stage of the study, 20 young (20—40 year old) listeners and 20 aged (62—74 year old) ones were examined. The mean SRT50 in the aged patients was found to be –6.9±1.1 dB SNR which was much worse than the mean STR50 in the young subjects (–8.7±0.9 dB SNR). It is concluded that, bearing in mind the excellent comparability of the results of the RUMat rix test across different languages, it can be used as a universal tool in international research projects.

Keywords:

speech audiometry

speech in noise tests

Russian matrix sentence test

Authors:

Boboshko M.Iu.

Laboratoriia slukha i rechi Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. akad. I.P. Pavlova

ORCID: 0000-0003-2453-523X

Zhilinskaya E.V.

Research Centre of I.P. Pavlov St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia, 197022

Warzybok A.

Medical Physics and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Carl-von-Ossietzky, University Oldenburg, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany

Mal'tseva N.V.

Laboratoriia slukha i rechi Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. akad. I.P. Pavlova

Zokoll M.

Medical Physics and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Carl-von-Ossietzky, University Oldenburg, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany

Kollmeier B.

Medical Physics and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Carl-von-Ossietzky, University Oldenburg, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany

List of references:

Tavartkiladze G.A. Rukovodstvo po klinicheskoy audiologii. Handbook on clinical audiology. M.: Meditsina; 2013. (In Russ.).
Boboshko M.Yu. Rechevaya audiometriya. Uchebnoe posobie. Speech audiometry. Handbook. SPb: Izd-vo SPbGMU; 2012. (In Russ.).
Korotkov Yu.V. Rechevye tekhnologii v audiologicheskoi praktike. Speech technology in audiological practice: Dis. ... kand. med. nauk. Sankt-Peterburg; 2008. Available at: http://medical-diss.com/medicina/rechevye-tehnologii-v-audiologicheskoy-praktike. Accessed January 11, 2016.
Soli S.D., Wong L.L.N. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol. 2008; 47 (6): 356–361. doi: 10.1080/14992020801895136.
Kuk F., Lau C.C., Korhonen P., Crose B., Peeters H. et al. Development of the ORCA nonsense syllable test. Ear Hear. 2010; 31(6): 779–795. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e97bfb.
Zokoll, M., Wagener, K.C., Brand, T., Buschermöhle, M., Kollmeier, B. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype. Int J Audiol. 2012; 51 (9): 697-707. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.690078.
Kollmeier B., Wesselkamp M. Development and evaluation of a sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 102 (4): 1085-1099. PMID: 9348699
Versfeld N.J., Daalder L., Festen J.M., Houtgast T. Method for the selection of sentence material for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 107 (3): 1671-1684. PMID: 10738820
Ozimek E., Kutzner D., Sek A., Wicher A. Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise. Int J Audiol. 2009; 48 (7): 433-443. doi: 10.1080/14992020902725521.
Nielsen J.B., Dau T. The Danish hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol. 2011; 50 (3): 202-208. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.524254.
Hagerman B. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol. 1982; 11 (2): 79-87. PMID: 7178810.
Wagener K., Josvassen J.L., Ardenkjaer R. Design, optimization, and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42 (1): 10-17. PMID: 12564511.
Zokoll M.A., Hochmuth S., Warzybok A., Wagener K.C., Buschermöhle M., Kollmeier B. Speech-in-Noise Tests for Multilingual Hearing Screening and Diagnostics. Am J Audiol. 2013; 22 (1): 175-178. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0061).
Jansen S., Luts H., Wagener K.C., Kollmeier B., Del Rio M., Dauman R., James C., Fraysse B., Vormès E., Frachet B., Wouters J., van Wieringen A. Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: A multi-center study. Int J Audiol. 2012; 51 (3): 164–173. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.633568.
Kollmeier B., Warzybok A., Hochmuth S., Zokoll M.A., Uslar V., Brand T., Wagener K.C. The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages – A review. Int J Audiol. 2015; 54 Suppl. 2: 3-16. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971.
Puglisi G.E., Warzybok A., Hochmuth S., Visentin C., Astolfi A., Prodi N., Kollmeier B. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol. 2015; 54 Suppl. 2: 44-50. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1061709.
Wardenga N., Batsoulis C., Wagener K.C., Brand T., Lenarz T., Maier H. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment. Int J Audiol. 2015; 54 Suppl. 2: 71-79. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1079929.
Zokoll M.A., Fidan D., Türkyılmaz D., Hochmuth S., Ergenç İ., Sennaroğlu G., Kollmeier B. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test. Int J Audiol. 2015; 54 Suppl. 2: 51-61. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1074735.
Warzybok A, Zokoll M., Wardenga N., Ozimek E., Boboshko M., Kollmeier B. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test. Int J Audiol. 2015. Early Online 1-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1020969.
Gel'fand S.A. Slukh: Vvedenie v psikhologicheskuyu i fiziologicheskuyu akustiku. M.: Meditsina;1984.
Boboshko M.Yu., Garbaruk E.S., Zhilinskaya E.V., Abu-Dzhamea A.Kh. Auditory temporal resolution in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Sensornye sistemy. 2014; 28 (3): 10-15. (In Russ.).
Mukari S.Z-M.S., Abdul Wahat N.H., Mazlan R. Effects of Ageing and Hearing Thresholds on Speech Perception in Quiet and in Noise Perceived in Different Locations. Korean J Audiol. 2014; 18(3): 112-118. doi: 10.7874/kja.2014.18.3.112.

Close metadata