Clinical results of posterior lamellar femto-keratoplasty in patients with corneal endothelial dystrophies

Pashtaev A.N.

S.N. Fyodorov National Medical Research Center «MNTK «Eye Microsurgery», Moscow, Russia

Pashtaev N.P.

Cheboksarskiĭ filial FGBU "MNTK "Mikrokhirurgiia glaza" im. akad. S.N. Fedorova" Minzdrava Rossii

Maliugin B.É.

FGBU "MNTK "Mikrokhirurgiia glaza" im. akad. S.N. Fedorova Rosmedtekhnologiĭ", Moskva

Pozdeeva N.A.

Cheboksarskiĭ filial FGBU "MNTK "Mikrokhirurgiia glaza" im. akad. S.N. Fedorova" Minzdrava Rossii

Elakov U.N.

Cheboksary branch of S.N. Fyodorov National Medical Research Center «MNTK «Eye Microsurgery», Cheboksary, Russia

Katmakov K.I.

Cheboksary branch of S.N. Fyodorov National Medical Research Center «MNTK «Eye Microsurgery», Cheboksary, Russia

Clinical results of posterior lamellar femto-keratoplasty in patients with corneal endothelial dystrophies

Authors:

Pashtaev A.N., Pashtaev N.P., Maliugin B.É., Pozdeeva N.A., Elakov U.N., Katmakov K.I.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(3): 25‑31

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202013603125

Downloaded: 50

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Pashtaev AN, Pashtaev NP, Maliugin BÉ, Pozdeeva NA, Elakov UN, Katmakov KI. Clinical results of posterior lamellar femto-keratoplasty in patients with corneal endothelial dystrophies. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(3):25‑31. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202013603125

Подписка 2025-2 (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)

Close metadata

Purpose — to evaluate clinical results of posterior lamellar keratoplasty performed with Russian femtosecond laser «Vizum» for treating patients with primary and secondary corneal endothelial dystrophies. Material and methods. The study included 30 operated eyes: 10 with Fuch’s primary endothelial dystrophy of the cornea and 20 with secondary endothelial dystrophy. Patients were examined on the 7th day, as well as at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the surgery. All 28 patients (30 eyes) were followed-up for 12 months, 12 patients (14 eyes) were followed-up for 24 months. Results. In 3 months after the surgery, transparent engraftment was observed in most cases. In 1 case, its primary failure was diagnosed and repeated keratoplasty was performed. Postoperative haze in host-donor interface was observed in 1 case. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was 554±43 µm. Transplant thickness in the central zone was 80±13 µm. The amount of eyes with Best Spectacle-Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA) of 0.3 was 43%. Endothelial cells density (ECD) was 1538±500 cells/mm2. Endothelial cells loss amounted to 30.4%. By the 12th month, recipient's cornea and the transplant remained transparent in all cases. Haze in the host-donor interface was still observed in 1 case. CCT was 581±47 µm, transplant thickness was 80±16 µm. The amount of eyes with BSCVA of 0.3 was 53%. Keratometry astigmatism was 2.08±1.47 D, refractive astigmatism — 1.72±0.83 D. ECD was 1324±383 cells/mm2. Endothelial cells loss amounted to 40.1%. At 24th months after the surgery (12 patients, 14 eyes) the recipient’s cornea and the transplant remained clear in all cases. CCT was 591±48 µm, transplant thickness was 81±15 µm. Amount of eyes with BSCVA of 0.3 was 71.4%. ECD was 1426±422 cells/mm2. Endothelial cells loss — 35.1%. Conclusions. The predictability of applanation and high quality of cutting of the «Vizum» femtosecond laser assure the predictability of the process of preparing an ultrathin cornel graft from the endothelial side. Clinical results have demonstrated its effectiveness for rehabilitation of visual functions (up to BSCVA 1.0).

Keywords:

posterior lamellar keratoplasty

ultrathin transplant

femtosecond laser

endothelial cornea dystrophy

Authors:

Pashtaev A.N.

S.N. Fyodorov National Medical Research Center «MNTK «Eye Microsurgery», Moscow, Russia

Pashtaev N.P.

Cheboksarskiĭ filial FGBU "MNTK "Mikrokhirurgiia glaza" im. akad. S.N. Fedorova" Minzdrava Rossii

Maliugin B.É.

FGBU "MNTK "Mikrokhirurgiia glaza" im. akad. S.N. Fedorova Rosmedtekhnologiĭ", Moskva

Pozdeeva N.A.

Cheboksarskiĭ filial FGBU "MNTK "Mikrokhirurgiia glaza" im. akad. S.N. Fedorova" Minzdrava Rossii

Elakov U.N.

Cheboksary branch of S.N. Fyodorov National Medical Research Center «MNTK «Eye Microsurgery», Cheboksary, Russia

Katmakov K.I.

Cheboksary branch of S.N. Fyodorov National Medical Research Center «MNTK «Eye Microsurgery», Cheboksary, Russia

List of references:

Riks IA, Papanyan SS, Astakhov SYu, Novikov SA. Novel clinico-morphological classification of the corneal endothelial-epithelial dystrophy. Oftal’mologicheskie vedomosti. 2017;10(3):46-52. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/OV10346-52
Malyugin BE, Moroz ZI, Borzenok SA, Drozdov IV, Ayba EE, Pashtaev AN. First experience and clinical results of DSAEK utilizing the pre-cut ultrathin grafts. Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2013;(3):12-16. (In Russ.).
Dekaris I, Pauk M, Draca N, Pasalic A, Gabric N. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty? Is a thinner donor lamella the better choice? J Transplant Technol. 2012;2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0991.S2-004
Neff KD, Biber JM, Holland EJ. Comparison of central corneal graft thickness to visual acuity outcomes in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011;30(4): 388-391. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181f236c6
Koenig SB, Covert DJ, Dupps WJ, Meisler DM. Visual acuity, refractive error, and endothelial cell density six months after Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Cornea. 2007;26(6):670-674. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0b013e3180544902
Dupps WJ, Qian Y, Meisler DM. Multivariate model of refractive shift in Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(4):578-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.045
Busin M, Madi S, Santorum P, Scorcia V, Beltz J. Ultrathin Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(6):1186-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.030
Marvanova LR. New method of graft formation for posterior automated lamellar keratoplasty in the treatment of patients with epithelial and endothelial corneal dystrophy. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2018;13(5):27-33. (In Russ.).
Rossi M, Mistò R, Gatto C, Garimoldi P, Campanelli M, D’Amato Tóthová J. Protective effects of deswelling on stromal collagen denaturation after a corneal femtosecond laser cut. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2013; 54(6):4148-4157. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-10818
Liu YC, Teo EP, Adnan KB, Yam GH, Peh GS, Tan DT, Mehta JS. Endothelial approach ultrathin corneal grafts prepared by femtosecond laser for Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Investigat Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2014;55(12):8393-8401. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15080
Sikder S, Snyder RW. Femtosecond laser preparation of donor tissue from the endothelial side. Cornea. 2006;25(4):416-422. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000195948.86071.98
Chen ES, Terry MA, Shamie N, Hoar KL, Friend DJ. Precut tissue in Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115(3):497-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.11.032
Jardine GJ, Holiman JD, Galloway JD, Stoeger CG, Chamberlain WD. Eye bank-prepared femtosecond laser-assisted automated descemet membrane endothelial grafts. Cornea. 2015;34(7):838-843. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000000453
Pozdeeva NA, Pashtaev AN, Mukhina NV, Korotchenko SA, Nikolaev IA, Shipunov AA. Experimental rationale of preparing of ultrathin transplant for posterior layered keratoplasty on side of cornea endothelium with Russian «Vizum» femtosecond laser. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2018;(3): 40-44. (In Russ.).
Malyugin BE, Izmailova SB, Pashtaev AN, Kuz’michev KN. Preliminary results of posterior layered keratoplasty with use of high energy femtosecond laser for ultrathin donor cornea transplant preparing. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2018;(4):140-142. (In Russ.).
Hjortdal J. Inverse cutting of posterior lamellar corneal grafts by a femtosecond laser. Open Ophthalmol J. 2012;6(1):19-22. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101206010019
Liu YC, Teo EP, Adnan KB, Yam GH, Peh GS, Tan DT, Mehta JS. Endothelial approach ultrathin corneal grafts prepared by femtosecond laser for Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Investigat Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2014;55(12):8393-8401. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15080
Komarova OYu, Lapshin KE, Burdel’ KV, Shatskikh AV, Zimina MV, Pashtaev AN, Novikov SV, Vartapetov SK, Izmailova SB. Innovative technologies in experimental corneal surgery ex vivo. Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine. 2018;10(4):84-93. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2018.10.4.10
Pashtaev AN, Malyugin BE, Pashtaev NP, Pozdeeva NA, Izmailova SB, Shipunov AA. First experience of posterior layered keratoplasty undertaken with Russian «Vizum» femtosecond laser. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2016;(5):167-169. (In Russ.).
Barry LW, Deborah SJ, Musch DC, Kaufman SC, Reinhart WJ, Shtein RM. Descemet`s stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcome. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(9):1818-1830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.021
Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES. Precut tissue for Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: vision, astigmatism, and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(2):248-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.017
Singh A, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Avadhanam V, Liu C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty / Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2017;36(11):1437-1443. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000001320

Close metadata