Comparison of the film thickness of composites of different degrees of viscosity

Gvetadze R.S.; Ryahovsky A.N.; Muradov M.A.; Chkalin V.A.; Poyurovskaya I.Y.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20209906178

Gvetadze R.S.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

ORCID: 0000-0003-0508-7072

Ryahovsky A.N.

National Medical Research Center «Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery» Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Muradov M.A.

National Medical Research Center «Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery» Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Chkalin V.A.

National Medical Research Center «Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery» Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Poyurovskaya I.Y.

National Medical Research Center «Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery» Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Comparison of the film thickness of composites of different degrees of viscosity

Authors:

Gvetadze R.S., Ryahovsky A.N., Muradov M.A., Chkalin V.A., Poyurovskaya I.Y.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2020;99(6): 78‑81

DOI: 10.17116/stomat20209906178

Read: 2262 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Gvetadze RS, Ryahovsky AN, Muradov MA, Chkalin VA, Poyurovskaya IY. Comparison of the film thickness of composites of different degrees of viscosity. Stomatology. 2020;99(6):78‑81. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20209906178

Подписка 2026 Стоматология (Stomatology)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Abstract:

The measurement of the film thickness of the composite cement Variolink Esthetic («Ivoclar-Vivadent», Liechtenstein) and the microhybrid composite Enamel («Micerium», Italy) was carried out according to ISO 4049: 2009 standards with a load force of 5 kg. While reducing the load force to 5 kg, all materials showed an increase in the film thickness; the film thickness of the Variolink Esthetic composite cement was changed from 23 microns (at 15 kg) to 32 microns (at 5 kg), and the film thickness of the microhybrid composite film Enamel was changed from 39 microns (at 15 kg) to 102 microns (at 5 kg). After preheating, the film thickness was changed from 23 microns (at 15 kg) to 44 microns (at 5 kg).

Keywords:

bonding veneers

pre-heating dental composite

film thickness of composite cements

Authors:

Gvetadze R.S.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

ORCID: 0000-0003-0508-7072

Ryahovsky A.N.

National Medical Research Center «Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery» Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Muradov M.A.

National Medical Research Center «Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery» Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Chkalin V.A.

National Medical Research Center «Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery» Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Poyurovskaya I.Y.

National Medical Research Center «Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery» Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Received:

21.10.2019

Accepted:

11.12.2019

Close metadata

References:

Magne P, Belser U. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition e a biomimetic approach. 1st ed. Carol Stream. Quintessence 2003;338-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00133-5
Wagner WC, Aksu MN, Neme AM, Linger JB, Pink FB, Walker S. Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restoration microleakage. Oper Dent. 2008;33:72-78. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/18084.7980
Castro FL, Campos BB, Bruno KF, Reges RV. Temperature and curing time affect composite sorption and solubility. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21:157-162.
Trujillo M, Newman SM, Stansbury JW. Use of near-IR to monitor the influence of external heating on dental composite photopolymerization. Dent Mater. 2004;20:766-777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.02.003
Silva JC, Rogerio Vieira R, Rege IC, Cruz CA, Vaz LG, Estrela C, Castro FL. Pre-heating mitigates composite degradation. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015; 23:571-579. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150284.
Ausiello P, Cassese A, Miele C, Beguinot F, Garcia-Godoy F, Di Jeso B, Ulianich L. Cytotoxicity of dental resin composites: an in vitro evaluation. J Applied Toxicol. 2013;36(6):451-457. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.1765
Ivashov AS, Zaytsev DV, Mandra YuV. The dependence of the strength properties of modern composite materials in compression on the polymerization temperature. Problemy stomatologii. 2011;5:30-34. (in Russ.).
Chistyakova GG, Sakhar GG. Method of thermogravimetric analysis for determining the conversion of monomers in composite materials. Stomatologicheskiy zhurnal. 2015;3:213-216. (in Russ.).
Prasanna N, Pallavi Reddy Y, Kavitha S, Lakshmi Narayanan L. Degree of conversion and residual stress of preheated and room-temperature composites. Indian J Dent Res. 2007;18:73-176. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.35827
Demirbuga S, Ucar FI, Cayabatmaz M, Zorba YO, Cantekin K, Topçuoğlu HS, Kilinc HI.Microshear bond strength of preheated silorane- and methacrylate-based composite resins to dentin. Scanning. 2016;38(1):63-69.
Da Costa J, McPharlin R, Hilton T, Ferracane J. Effect of heat on the flow of commercial composites. Am J Dent. 2009;2:92-96.
Dionysopoulos D, Tolidis K, Gerasimou P, Koliniotou-Koumpia E. Effect of preheating on the film thickness of contemporary composite restorative materials. J Dent Sci. 2014;9:313-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2014.03.006
Goulart M, Damin DF, Melara R, Conceicao. Effect of pre-heating composites on film thickness. J Res Dentistry. 2013;4:274-280. https://doi.org/10.19177/jrd.v1e42013p
Muradov MA, Ryahovsky AN, Chkalin VA, Poyurovskaya IY. Sorokina D.R. Study of the film thickness of dental resin composites after their preheating. Dentistry. 2019;98(6):96-101. https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20199806196
Dentistry-Polymer Based Restorative Materials, ISO Standart 4049 4th ed. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
Dietschi D, Maeder M, Holz J. In vitro evaluation of marginal fit and morphology of fired ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:271-278.
Celik C, Gemalmaz D. Comparison of marginal integrity of ceramic and composite veneer restorations luted with two different resin agents: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15(1):59-64.
Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns. Dent Mater. 2005;21:445-453.