The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Muraev A.A.

Nizhegorodskaia gosudarstvennaia meditsinskaia akademiia

Ivanov S.Yu.

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russia, Moscow, Russia

Leonov S.V.

Department of Forensic Medicine and Medical Right, Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia

Mrue A.H.

The Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Muhametshin R.F.

The Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Gazhva Yu.V.

Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia

Comparative analysis of different types of implant-abutment interface on the basis of three-dimensional finite element analysis data

Authors:

Muraev A.A., Ivanov S.Yu., Leonov S.V., Mrue A.H., Muhametshin R.F., Gazhva Yu.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2019;98(1): 11‑16

Read: 1075 times


To cite this article:

Muraev AA, Ivanov SYu, Leonov SV, Mrue AH, Muhametshin RF, Gazhva YuV. Comparative analysis of different types of implant-abutment interface on the basis of three-dimensional finite element analysis data. Stomatology. 2019;98(1):11‑16. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20199801111

Recommended articles:
Postoperative wate­rfall breast defo­rmity correction algo­rithm. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2025;(4):27-36

References:

  1. Muraev AA, Ivanov SYu, Leonov SV, Starostin PV, Chugunov NM. Stress final element analysis at the abatement-implant-bone interface. Stomatologiya. 2016;95(1):18-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201695118-20
  2. Mezhgosudarstvennyj standart «GOST 25548-82» ot 19.03.13. «Osnovnye opredeleniya». Active on 15.01.17. Avalible at: http://www.g-ost.ru/39369.html.
  3. Mezhgosudarstvennyj standart «GOST 25557-82» ot 19.03.13. «Konusy instrumental'nye. Osnovnye razmery». Active on 15.01.17. Avalible at: http://www.g-ost.ru/13483.html.
  4. Bozkaya D, Muftu S, Muftu A. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:523-530.
  5. Ericsson I, et al. Different types of inflammatory reactions in peri-implant soft tissues. J Clin Perio. 1995;22:255-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1995.tb00143.x
  6. Lazzara RJ, et al. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postoperative crestal bone levels. Int J Perio Rest Dent. 2006;26:9-17.
  7. Maeda Y, Miura J, Taki I, Sogo M. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale? Clin Oral Impl Res. 2007;18:581-584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01398.x
  8. Sahabi M, Adibrad M, Sadat F. et al. Biomechanical Effects of Platform Switching in Two Different Implant Systems: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Journal of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 2013;10:4.
  9. Schmitt C, Nogueira-Filho G, Tenenbaum HC, et al. Performance of conical abutment (Morse Taper) connection implants: a systematic review. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 2013;102(2):552-574. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34709

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.