The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Muraev A.A.

Nizhegorodskaia gosudarstvennaia meditsinskaia akademiia

Ivanov S.Yu.

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russia, Moscow, Russia

Gazhva Yu.V.

Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia

Muhametshin R.F.

The Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Ryabova V.M.

Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia

Mrue A.H.

The Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Korotkova N.L.

Nizhegorodskaia gosudarstvennaia meditsinskaia akademiia;
NNIITO Minzdravsotsrazvitiia RF

Mathematical rationale and results of clinical use of IRIS short implants

Authors:

Muraev A.A., Ivanov S.Yu., Gazhva Yu.V., Muhametshin R.F., Ryabova V.M., Mrue A.H., Korotkova N.L.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2018;97(5): 65‑70

Read: 974 times


To cite this article:

Muraev AA, Ivanov SYu, Gazhva YuV, Muhametshin RF, Ryabova VM, Mrue AH, Korotkova NL. Mathematical rationale and results of clinical use of IRIS short implants. Stomatology. 2018;97(5):65‑70. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20189705165

Recommended articles:
Finite-element simu­lation of solar radiation impact on corpse’s cooling. Fore­nsic Medi­cal Expe­rtise. 2025;(2):31-36

References:

  1. Muraev AA, Ivanov SYu, Leonov SV, Starostin PV, Chugunov NM. Stress final element analysis at the abatement-implant-bone interface. Stomatologiya. 2016;95(1):18-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201695118-20
  2. Nikolsky VYu, Vel’dyaksova LV, Maksyutov AE. Short surface-porous dental implants as an alternative to open sinus lift. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2011;7(1):292-293 (In Russ.)
  3. Anitua E, Flores C, Flores J, Alkhraisat MH. Clinical Effectiveness of 6.5-mm-Long Implants to Support Two-Implant Fixed Prostheses in Premolar-Molar Region: The Influence of Immediate Loading and the Length of Splinting Implant. J Prosthodontics. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12761
  4. Bechara S, Nimčenko T, Kubilius R. The efficacy of short (6 mm) dental implants with a novel thread design. Citation Stomatologija. 2017;19(2):55-63.
  5. Bozkaya D, Muftu S, Muftu A. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:523-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.024
  6. Rokn AR, Keshtkar A, Monzavi A, Hashemi K, Bitaraf T. Comparing Short Dental Implants to Standard Dental Implants: Protocol for a Systematic Review. JMIR Research Protocols. 2018;18;7(1):16. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8836
  7. Sotto-Maior BS, Mercuri EG, Senna PM, Assis NM, Francischone CE, Del Bel Cury AA. Evaluation of bone remodeling around single dental implants of different lengths: a mechanobiological numerical simulation and validation using clinical data. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2015;19(7):699-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2015.1052418
  8. Yazicioglu D, Bayram B, Oguz Y, Cinar D, Uckan S. Stress Distribution on Short Implants at Maxillary Posterior Alveolar Bone Model with Different Bone-to-Implant Contact Ratio: Finite Element Analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-14-00003

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.