The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Trunin D.A.

Samara State Medical University

Nesterov A.M.

Samara State Medical University

Sadykov M.I.

Samara State Medical University

Sagirov M.R.

Samara State Medical University

Musaev N.Sh.

Samara State Medical University

Dmitriev D.I.

Samara State Medical University

Methods used to restore the destroyed clinical crown of the tooth

Authors:

Trunin D.A., Nesterov A.M., Sadykov M.I., Sagirov M.R., Musaev N.Sh., Dmitriev D.I.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2024;17(1): 18‑22

Read: 1557 times


To cite this article:

Trunin DA, Nesterov AM, Sadykov MI, Sagirov MR, Musaev NSh, Dmitriev DI. Methods used to restore the destroyed clinical crown of the tooth. Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2024;17(1):18‑22. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosstomat20241701118

References:

  1. Gazhva SI, Teterin AI, Prosvirkina ZhS. Methods of orthopedic treatment of patients with destroyed clinical crowns of supporting teeth. Literature review. Medical and pharmaceutical journal «Pulse». 2021;23(10):56-63. (In Russ.).
  2. Ayedun OS, Oredugba FA, Sote EO. Comparison of the treatment outcomes of the conventional stainless steel crown restorations and the hall technique in the treatment of carious primary molars. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021;24(4):584-594. 
  3. Ertesyan AR, Sadykov MI, Nesterov AM. Study of the joint strength of an artificial tooth crown on a stump pin tab with screw fixation (laboratory study). Bulletin of Dentistry and Maxillofacial surgery. 2020;17(2):31-34. (In Russ.).
  4. Nesterov AM, Sadykov MI, Sagirov MR. Analysis of prosthetic treatment of patients with pinlays with artificial crowns according to archival materials of a large dental clinic. The Scientific Heritage. 2021;76-1:17-20. (In Russ.).
  5. Nischal M, Gupta T, Mehra M, et al. Clinical Comparison of Three Tooth-colored Full-coronal Restorations in Primary Maxillary Incisors. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13(6):622-629. 
  6. Juraeva ShF, Vorobyev MA, Tropina AA. Substantiation of the effectiveness of restorative therapy of teeth after endodontic treatment. Modern problems of science and education. 2018;4:206-206. (In Russ.).
  7. Kramer EJ, Meyer-Lueckel H, Wolf TG. Success and survival of post-restorations: six-year results of a prospective observational practice-based clinical study. Int Endod J. 2019;52(5):569-578. 
  8. Mörch CM, Atsu S, Cai W. Artificial Intelligence and Ethics in Dentistry: A Scoping Review. J Dent Res. 2021;100(13):1452-1460.
  9. Nesterov AM, Sadykov MI, Matrosov VV. Modern methods and approaches to the treatment of patients with destroyed clinical dental crowns (literature review). Avicenna. 2020;64:9-16. (In Russ.).
  10. Zholondziovsky PA, Timerbulatov AD, Grigoriev SS. Dependence of the adhesion force of the fiberglass pin in the root canal of the tooth on the choice of adhesive system. Current issues of modern medicine and healthcare. 2018;2:93-98. (In Russ.).
  11. Khabadze ZS, Generalova YuA, Sherozia MG. Clinical and morphological aspects of the use of fiberglass-based structures. Endodontics Today. 2020;18(3):39-45. (In Russ.).
  12. Lazari PC, de Carvalho MA, Del Bel Cury AA, et al. Survival of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors restored with different types of posts-and-core foundation restoration material. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2018;119(5):769-776. 
  13. Aslan T, Sagsen B, Er Ö. Evaluation of fracture resistance in root canal-treated teeth restored using different techniques. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21(6):795-800. 
  14. Novak NV. The use of pins of various types in the restoration of the tooth crown (review). Dental journal. 2018;19(4):288-293. (In Russ.).
  15. Sarkis-Onofre R, Amaral Pinheiro H, Poletto-Neto V. Randomized controlled trial comparing glass fiber posts and cast metal posts. J Dent. 2020;96:103-104. 
  16. Batyukov NM, Chibisova MA. Analysis of the condition of the upper molars in primary treated patients after previously performed endodontic treatment according to cone-beam computed tomography. Institute of Dentistry. 2021;3:28-29. (In Russ.).
  17. Koshelev KA, Belousov NN, Ivanova SB. Analysis of the causes of repeated patient requests for dental care. Bulletin of the Smolensk State Medical Academy. 2018;17(3):125-130. (In Russ.).
  18. Bell-Rönnlöf AL, Jaatinen J, Lassila L. Transmission of light through fiber-reinforced composite posts. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(6):928-933. 
  19. Николаева Ю.Д. Повторное эндодонтическое лечение зубов, запломбированных серебряными штифтами. Актуальные вопросы стоматологии: сб. статей междунар. научно-практ. конференции. Казань, 2021;366-370. 
  20. Kotkowiak M, Piasecki A, Kotkowiak M, Buchwald T. The Mechanism of Wear Reduction in the Ni-CaF2 Composite Material: Raman and Confocal Microscopy Insights. Materials (Basel). 2022;10:15(16):5501.
  21. Karelsky VV, Filippov VA, Polivanaya AD. Restoration of the stumps of destroyed crowns of teeth using a composite material reinforced with a fiberglass pin. Bulletin of the Northern State Medical University. 2020;1:66-67. (In Russ.).
  22. Шумилович Б.Р., Иванов С.Г., Ермилов Д.А. Прямая постэндодонтическая реставрация зубов с использованием core-композитов и стекловолоконных штифтов: морфологические аспекты (исследование in vitro). Эндодонтия Today. 2022;20(1):20-27. 
  23. Delgaudio Pignataro RR, Samico RP, Mendes Campaner L. Influence of Different Fibreglass Post Geometries on the Stress Distribution and Pull-Out Bond Strength Before and After Mechanical Cycling. Eur Endod J. 2021;6(2):170-176. 
  24. Hoshino IAE., Dos Santos PH, Briso ALF. Biomechanical performance of three fiberglass post cementation techniques: Imaging, in vitro, and in silico analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2022;3:301-309. 
  25. Voronov IA, Mardanov OS, Todua IM. Resistance to fractures of endodontically treated teeth restored using fiberglass pin structures made using CAD/CAM: literature review. Endodontics Today. 2020;17(3):83-86. (In Russ.).
  26. Bruhnke M, Wierichs RJ, von Stein-Lausnitz M, et al. Long-term Survival of Adhesively Luted Post-endodontic Restorations. J Endod. 2022;48(5):606-613. 
  27. Zholudev SE, Ivlev YuN. A variant of restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Institute of Dentistry. 2020;1:46-47. (In Russ.).
  28. Almaghrabi J, Alesawi A, Attar E. Radiographic Analysis of Posts Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2022;23(14):37-43. 
  29. Mastrogianni A, Lioliou EA, Tortopidis D, et al. Fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars restored with different post systems and metal-ceramic or monolithic zirconia crowns. Dent Mater J. 2021;40(3):606-614. 
  30. Bhopatkar J, Ikhar A, Nikhade P, et al. Esthetic Reconstruction of Badly Mutilated Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Glass Fiber Reinforced Post: A Case Report Cureus. 2022;14(8):262-276. 
  31. Nesterov AM, Sadykov MI, Matrosov V.. Analysis of orthopedic treatment of patients with stump pin tabs with an artificial crown with significant destruction of the clinical crown of the tooth according to archival materials of the dental clinic. Postgraduate Bulletin of the Volga region. 2020;1-2:96-101. (In Russ.).
  32. Mailybaev BA, Makhmudova UB. The effectiveness of the use of parapulpar pins (PPSh) in the restoration of defects in the crown of the frontal teeth. Journal of Biomedicine and Practice. 2022;7(1):17-19. (In Russ.).
  33. Sharma S, Makkar M, Luthra R, et al. Fracture load assessment of digitally fabricated post and prefabricated fibre post in endodontically treated teeth. Technol Health Care. 2023;31(2):447-458. 
  34. Piangsuk T, Dawson DV, El-Kerdani T, Lindquist TJ. The Accuracy of Post and Core Fabricated with Digital Technology. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(3):221-226. 
  35. Lomiashvili LM, Mikhailovsky SG, Pogadaev DV. Study of anatomical and topographic features of dental tissues in order to achieve decent modeling results in aesthetic dentistry. Institute of Dentistry. 2019;3:110-113. (In Russ.).
  36. Barghi H, Sharifi S. Comparison of fracture resistance of primary incisor teeth restored with glass fiber post and reversed-oriented metal post — An in vitro study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023;20:29-37. 
  37. Kharboutly NA, Allaf M, Kanout S. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Central Incisors Restored Using Different Post and Crown Materials. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e33778. PMID: 36798627; PMCID: PMC9925666. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33778
  38. Mugri MH, Sayed ME, Nedumgottil BM. Treatment Prognosis of Restored Teeth with Crown Lengthening vs. Deep Margin Elevation: A Systematic Review. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(21):67-73. 
  39. Jalalova MV, Ohanyan AI, Tsalikova NA. Numerical and experimental study of the strength properties of premolars with pin zirconium tabs at different load angles. Russian Journal of Biomechanics. 2021;25(3):273-284. (In Russ.).
  40. Soshnikova KA, Skachkova AA, Polivanaya OD. «Bildup vs metal pin stump»: comparison of constructions. Bulletin of the Northern State Medical University. 2021;46(1):28-30. (In Russ.).
  41. Ferrari M, Pontoriero DIK, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Carboncini F. Restorative difficulty evaluation system of endodontically treated teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(1):65-80. 
  42. Perdigão J, Araujo E, Ramos RQ, et al. Adhesive dentistry: Current concepts and clinical considerations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(1):51-68.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12692
  43. Hori M, Hori T, Sekine H. Shrinkage characteristics of a novel lower contractile acrylic pattern resin. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(6):900-908. 
  44. Bustamante-Hernández N, Montiel-Company JM, Bellot-Arcís C. Clinical Behavior of Ceramic, Hybrid and Composite Onlays. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20):75-82. 
  45. Postnikov MA, Nesterov AM, Trunin DA, Sagirov MR. Possibilities of diagnostics and complex treatment of patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunctions. Clinical dentistry. 2020;1:60-63. (In Russ.).
  46. Yumashev AV, Mikhailova MV, Fomin IV. A New Concept for the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Patients with Pathologic Comorbidities Using Cutting-Edge Digital Technologies in Dental Orthopaedics. Eur J Dent. 2020;14(4):533-538. 
  47. Astashina NB, Petrachev AS, Kazakov SV. Possibilities of using digital technologies at the stages of orthopedic treatment of patients with defects of hard tissues of teeth. Problems of dentistry. 2021;17(1):136-142. (In Russ.).
  48. Edelstein BL. Disruptive innovations in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020;151(8):549-552. 
  49. Дьяченко Д.Ю., Дьяченко С.В. Применение метода конечных элементов в компьютерной симуляции для улучшения качества лечения пациентов в стоматологии: систематический обзор. Кубанский науч. мед. вестник. 2021;28(5):98-116. 
  50. Dotto L, Girotto LPS, Correa Silva Sousa YT, et al. Factors influencing the clinical performance of the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: An assessment of systematic reviews of clinical studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;5:S0022-3913(22)00213-X.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.030
  51. Mannocci F, Bitter K, Sauro S, et al. Present status and future directions: The restoration of root filled teeth. Int Endod J. 2022;55(4):1059-1084.
  52. Зубопротезная техника. Под ред. Арутюнова С.Д., Булгаковой Д.М., Гришкиной М.Г. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2016.
  53. Ertesyan AR, Sadykov MI, Nesterov AM. Study of the joint strength of an artificial tooth crown on a stump pin tab with screw fixation (laboratory study). Bulletin of Dentistry and Maxillofacial surgery. 2020;17(2):31-34. (In Russ.).
  54. Манатина В.И. Клиническое обоснование показаний к применению эндокоронок. Совр. стоматология. 2019;75(2):69-74. 
  55. Papalexopoulos D, Samartzi TK, Sarafianou AA. Analysis of the Endocrown Restoration: A Literature Review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(4):422-426. 
  56. Dartora NR, de Conto Ferreira MB, Moris ICM. Effect of intracoronal depth of teeth restored with endocrowns on fracture resistance: in vitro and 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Journal of endodontics. 2018;44(7):1179-1185.
  57. Irmaleny Z, Ardjanggi S, Mardiyah AA. Endocrown Restoration on Postendodontics Treatment on Lower First Molar. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019;9(3):303-310. 
  58. Makeev VF, Skalsky VR, Pavlychko RR. The effect of cyclic loading by the force of masticatory pressure and higher on the surface of metal-ceramic and pre-ceramic endocorns. Modern dentistry. 2018;2:76-77. (In Russ.).
  59. Sevbitov AV, Dorofeev AE, Ershov KA. Assessment of the influence of the oral cavity environment on the strength characteristics of endocorns made of hybrid ceramics in laboratory conditions. Bulletin of the Volgograd State Medical University. 2020;4:62-64. (In Russ.).
  60. Ang Y, Tew IM. Conservative management of extensively damaged endodontically treated tooth using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing-based hybrid-ceramic endocrown: A clinical report. J Conserv Dent. 2020;23(6):644-647. 
  61. Sorrentino R, Ruggiero G, Di Mauro MI. Optical behaviors, surface treatment, adhesion, and clinical indications of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS): A narrative review. J Dent. 2021;112:103-122. 

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.