The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Shkol’nik G.S.

Cheboksary branch of S.N. Fyodorov National Medical Research Center «MNTK «Eye Microsurgery», 10 Traktorostroiteley Pr., Cheboksary, Chuvash Republic, Russian Federation, 428028

Shkolnik S.F.

Cheboksary branch of «NMIC «MNTK «Eye microsurgery» im. akad. S.N. Fedorova» Ministry of health of Russia, 428022, Cheboksary, Chuvash Republic, Traktorostroiteley Ave., 10

Krasnozhen V.N.

Kafedra otorinolaringologii, kafedra luchevoĭ diagnostiki Kazanskoĭ gosudarstvennoĭ meditsinskoĭ akademii

Pashtaev N.P.

Cheboksarskiĭ filial FGBU "MNTK "Mikrokhirurgiia glaza" im. akad. S.N. Fedorova" Minzdrava Rossii

The advantages of coblation endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy

Authors:

Shkol’nik G.S., Shkolnik S.F., Krasnozhen V.N., Pashtaev N.P.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Rhinology. 2019;27(2): 89‑92

Read: 2107 times


To cite this article:

Shkol’nik GS, Shkolnik SF, Krasnozhen VN, Pashtaev NP. The advantages of coblation endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Russian Rhinology. 2019;27(2):89‑92. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosrino20192702189

Recommended articles:

References:

  1. Toti A. Dacryocystorhinostomia. Clinicamed. (Firenze). 1904;10(33):385.
  2. Dupuy-Dutemps L. Procedeplastiquede dacryocystorhinostomieetses results. Ann D’oculistique. 1921;158:241-261.
  3. West JM. Eime Fensterresection des Ductus naso-lacrimalis in Fallen von Stenosa. Arch Laryng Rhin. 1910;24(1):62.
  4. Moras K, Bhat M, Shreyas C, Mendonca N, Pinto G. External Dacryocystorhinostomy Versus Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Comparison. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011;5(2):182-186.
  5. Beloglazov VG. Alternatives to recovery of lacrimal duct patency. Vestnik Oftal’mologii. 2006;1:(122):8-12. (In Russ.)
  6. Bortnick DP. Coblation: An emerging technology and new technique for soft-tissue surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2001;107(2):614-615. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200102000-00053
  7. Xie X, Dendukuri N, McGregor M. Comparison of coblation tonsillectomy and electrocautery tonsillectomy in pediatric patients. Report No. 34. Montreal, QC: Technology Assessment Unit of the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC); November 12, 2008.
  8. Parsons SP, Cordes SR, Comer B. Comparison of posttonsillectomy pain using the ultrasonic scalpel, coblator, and electrocautery. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2006;134(1):106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2005.09.027
  9. Arya A, Donne AJ, Nigam A. Double-blind randomized controlled study of coblation tonsillotomy versus coblation tonsillectomy on postoperative pain. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2003;28(6):503-506. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00750.x

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.