ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроектыО насРекламаДоставка/ОплатаКонтакты
+7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Главная
  • / Журналы
  • / Вернуться в журнал
  • / Содержание номера
  • / Статья
Auricular autologous cartilage in redo rhinoseptoplasty

Auricular autologous cartilage in redo rhinoseptoplasty

Authors:
Валентин Ильич Шаробаро,
Георгий Александрович Аганесов,
Мария Исмаиловна Хайдар

Журнал: Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина. 2026;(3):97-103.

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202603197

Read: 338 раз

Download PDF (RU)Download PDF (EN)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze techniques and indications for redo rhinoseptoplasty with auricular autologous cartilage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The authors analyzed 39 articles containing retrospective and prospective data on outcomes, descriptions and complications of autologous cartilage in nasal tip reconstruction.

RESULTS

The main outcome measures were indications for autologous cartilage and its efficacy via analysis of improving nasal tip shape, projection and contours, as well as structure preservation. In details, clinical studies were based on assessment by surgeons (excellent, good, fair, poor and unsatisfactory) and various factors such as asymmetry, deformities, skin thickness, itching and pain. The secondary outcome measure was patient satisfaction based on surveys and photo comparisons. Surveys were designed to report patient satisfaction with appearance of nose, protruding tip, softness and volumetric contours, willingness to undergo redo surgery and/or recommend treatment to friends, sufficient information on risks and complications. Patients gave scores from 1 to 6: excellent (1); very good (2); good (3); fair (4); poor (5); and very poor (6). In addition, a lower complication rate compared to other grafts (bone, alloplastic and allogeneic) was considered. Septal cartilage, auricular bowl cartilage and rib cartilage are the main autografts for reconstruction or remodeling of nasal tip.

CONCLUSION

Auricular autologous cartilage is preferable for reinforcement and/or enlargement of nasal tip projection, effective support and reconstruction of nasal tip.

Keywords

  • redo rhinoseptoplasty
  • auricular autograft
  • auricular cartilage autograft

Дата поступления: 21.01.2025

Дата принятия в печать: 28.03.2025

Дата публикации: 21.09.2026

References
  1. Çakir B, Öreroğlu AR, Daniel RK. Surface aesthetics and analysis. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2015.09.004
  2. DeFatta RJ, Williams EF. The decision process in choosing costal cartilage for use in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Sug. 2008;24:365-371. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1083090
  3. Wee JH, Mun SJ, Na WS, Kim H, Park JH, Kim D-K, Jin H-R. Autologous vs Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage as Graft Material in Rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 May 01;19(3):183-188. PMID: 28334327; PMCID: PMC5540002. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1776
  4. Pascali M, Gentile P, Di Pasquali C, et al. The auricular cartilage in 197 secondary and tertiary rhinoplasties. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27:339-344 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002380
  5. Wee JH, Park M-H, Oh S, Jin H-R. Complications associated with autologous rib cartilage use in rhinoplasty: a meta-analysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015 Jan-Feb;17(1):49-55. PMID: 25429595. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2014.914
  6. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 July 21;6(7):e1000097. Epub 2009 July 21. PMID: 19621072; PMCID: PMC2707599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  7. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
  8. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in MetaAnalyses. 2014. https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
  9. Anderson JR. A reasoned approach to nasal base surgery. Arch Otolaryngol. 1984;110:349-358. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1984.00800320003001
  10. Çakir B, Öreroğlu AR, Daniel RK. Surface aesthetics in tip rhinoplasty: a step-by-step guide. Aesth Surg J. 2014;34:941-955. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X14537643
  11. Tebbetts JB. Open and closed rhinoplasty (minus the “versus”): analyzing processes. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26:456-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2006.06.003
  12. Gentile P, Bottini DJ, Nicoli F, Cervelli V. Open-tip approach: evolutions in rhinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2008 Sept;19(5):1323-1329. PMID: 18812858. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181843223
  13. Sajjadian A, Rubinstein R, Naghshineh N. Current status of grafts and implants in rhinoplasty: part I. Autologous grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125: 40e-49e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82f12
  14. Koehler J, McLain L. Grafting in cosmetic rhinoplasty. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin. 2012;24:59-66.
  15. Gentile P, Bottini DJ, Cervelli V. Rhinoplasty procedures: state of art in plastic surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19:1491-1496. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31818c04ae
  16. Kridel RW. Grafts and implants in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1995;3:473-486.
  17. Bottini DJ, Gentile P, Donfrancesco A, Fiumara L, Cervelli V. Augmentation rhinoplasty with autologous grafts. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 Jan;32(1): 136-142. PMID: 17962991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9052-3
  18. Bottini DJ, Gentile P, Arpino A, Dasero G, Cervelli V. Reconstruction of the nasal valve. J Craniofac Surg. 2007 May;18(3):516-519. PMID: 17538311. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e318052ff30
  19. Brent B. The versatile cartilage autograft: current trends in clinical transplantation. Clin Plast Surg. 1979;6:163-180.
  20. Allcroft RA, Friedman CD, Quatela VC. Cartilage grafts for head and neck augmentation and reconstruction. Autografts and homografts. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1994;27:69-80.
  21. Fedok FG. Costal cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43: 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2015.08.002
  22. Cochran CS. Harvesting rib cartilage in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43:195-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2015.09.018
  23. Gentile P, Cervelli V. Nasal dorsum reconstruction with 11th rib cartilage and auricular cartilage grafts. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:63-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31817433dc
  24. Varadharajan K, Sethukumar P, Anwar M, Patel K. Complications Associated With the Use of Autologous Costal Cartilage in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review. Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Aug;35(6):644-652. PMID: 26229125. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sju117
  25. Gibson T, Davis WB. The distortion of autogenous cartilage grafts: its cause and prevention. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 1957;10:257-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(57)80042-3
  26. Gunter JP, Landecker A, Cochran CS. Frequently used grafts in rhinoplasty: nomenclature and analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:14e-29e. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000221222.15451.fc
  27. Byrd HS, Andochick S, Copit S, Walton KG. Septal extension grafts: a method of controlling tip projection shape. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Sept;100(4): 999-1010. PMID: 9290671. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199709001-00026
  28. Peck GC, Peck GC Jr,. Adams WP Jr. Long-term follow-up of the onlay tip graft and umbrella graft. In: Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams W Jr, eds. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters, 1st edn. St. Louis, USA: Quality Medical Publishing; 2002:292.
  29. Sheen JH. Achieving more nasal tip projection by the use of a small autogenous vomer or septal cartilage graft: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;56:35-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197507000-00007
  30. Rohrich RJ, Adams WP, Deuber MA Jr. Graduated approach to tip refinement and projection. In: Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams W Jr, eds. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters, 1st edn. St. Louis, USA: Quality Medical Publishing; 2002:354.
  31. Rohrich RJ, Raniere J Jr, Ha RY. The alar contour graft: correction and prevention of alar rim deformities in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109:2495-2505. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200206000-00050
  32. Constantian MB. Indications and use of composite grafts in 100 consecutive secondary and tertiary rhinoplasty patients: introduction of the axial orientation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:1116. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000021870.72613.FC
  33. Daniel RK, Calvert JW. Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:2156-2171. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000122544.87086.b9
  34. Kreutzer C, Hoehne J, Gubisch W, et al. Free diced cartilage: a new application of diced cartilage grafts in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:461-470. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003622
  35. Manafi A, Hamedi ZS, Manafi A, Rajabiani A, Rajaee A, Manafi F. Injectable Cartilage Shaving: An Autologous and Long Lasting Filler Material for Correction of Minor Contour Deformities in Rhinoplasty. World J Plast Surg. 2015 July;4(2):93-100. PMID: 26284177; PMCID: PMC4537600.
  36. Peer LA. Extended use of diced cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1954; 14:178-185.
  37. Singh SK, Sood T, Sabarigirish K, Ramakrishnan N, Rajguru R, Manoj Kumar K. A New Era of Diced Cartilage Rhinoplasty: Our Experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Dec;67(4):338-340. Epub 2014 Dec 14. PMID: 26693448; PMCID: PMC4678274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-014-0816-1
  38. Lin SI, Hsiao YC, Chang CS, Chen PK, Chen JP, Ueng SH. Histology and Long-term Stability of Diced Cartilage Graft for Revision Rhinoplasty in a Cleft Patient. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 June 28;4(6):e763. PMID: 27482502; PMCID: PMC4956875. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000733
  39. Noordzij JP, Cates JM, Cohen SM, Bennett ML, Ries WM, Russell PT, Haynes D, Garrett CG, Ossoff RH. Preparation techniques for the injection of human autologous cartilage: an ex vivo feasibility study. Laryngoscope. 2008 Jan;118(1):185-188. PMID: 17975513. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e318155a25b
slide-cover
slide-cover
slide-cover

Recommended articles:

Modern surgical treatment of extensive traumatic skin detachments.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(3):124-132

Modern methods for surgical brow lift.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(3):115-123

Dorsocervical fat pads: searching for effective treatment.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(3):104-112

Auricular autologous cartilage in redo rhinoseptoplasty.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(3):97-103

Rationale for the sequence of procedures in a combined aesthetic correction protocol for facial involutional changes: botulinum toxin therapy and fractional photothermolysis.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(3):86-96

A differentiated approach to mastopexy technique in combined mammoplasty.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(3):80-84

Correction of lower eyelid position in patients with paralytic lagophthalmos.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(3):74-79

Comparison of ultrasound and traditional osteotomy in closed rhinoplasty.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(3):68-72

Morphometric internal nasal valve changes after revision rhinoseptoplasty using a lateral wall stabilization algorithm.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(3):62-67

Fat-sparing lower blepharoplasty for improvement of periorbital aesthetics.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(3):50-61

Издательство «Медиа Сфера»
РекламаДоставка/ОплатаО насКонтактыОбучение для редакцийПолитика конфиденциальностиПолитика обработки персональных данныхПубличная оферта на реализацию издательской продукции
ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроекты
  • RuStore

© 1998-2026

  • Телефоны издательства:

  • +7 (495) 482-41-18
  • +7 (495) 482-43-29

  • Прямой телефон отдела подписки
    (только по вопросам заказов и доставки журналов)

  • +7 (800) 250-18-12

  • пн-пт с 10:00 до 18:00

  • Telegram
  • VK
info@mediasphera.ru

  • Почтовый адрес:

  • Издательство «Медиа Сфера»,
    а/я 54, Москва, Россия, 127238

  • RuStore

© 1998-2026