Attractive appearance as a factor of human social adaptation

Bagnenko E.S.; Povzun S.A.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia2026011144

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

To analyze available literature data on the influence of appearance on social adaptation and hypothesis that attractive appearance of a person provides some advantages regarding interpersonal contacts and position in society.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We enrolled 58 studies after screening of PubMed and eLibrary.ru databases using the following keywords: “external attractiveness of a person”, “role of appearance”, “social adaptation”. We analyzed data on social and biological aspects of influence of personal appearance on relationships in society.

RESULTS

Traditionally, the role of a person’s appearance in social life is considered as something secondary due to idea of universal equality. The review and analysis show that people with beautiful appearance are more successful in social terms, while those with unattractive or nonstandard appearance have a lot of difficulties in establishing social contacts. An outwardly attractive person is subconsciously regarded as a bearer of positive qualities, trustworthy and vice versa. Some studies prove that assessment of another person’s beauty is programmed at the genetic level. Without denying the role of aesthetic preferences in assessing appearance of another person, various authors once again emphasize validity of biosocial nature of humans and biological role of such assessment. In this case, the assessed person is considered at an instinctive level as a sexual partner or competitor. From the standpoint of natural selection, external attractiveness unconsciously regarded as a sign of the animal’s health ensures survival of population.

CONCLUSION

This review proves the role of biological aspects in assessing appearance of other people that influences their adaptation in society.

Keywords:

external attractiveness of a person

biological aspects

social adaptation

Authors:

Bagnenko E.S.

Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia;
Galaxy Beauty Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-4584-7005

Povzun S.A.

Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-9252-0852

Received:

23.12.2024

Accepted:

06.08.2025

Close metadata

References:

Marshall CD, Hu MS, Leavit T, et al. Cutaneous scarring: basic science, current treatments, and future directions. Advances in Wound Care. 2018; 7(2):29-45. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2016.0696
Rumsey N, Harcourt D. The psychology of appearance. McGraw-Hill: Open University Press; 2005:256.
Sarwer DB. Body image, cosmetic surgery, and minimally invasive treatments. Body Image. 2019;31:302-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.01.009
Kulikov LV. Emotional stability of personality. St. Petersburg: Faculty of Psychology of St. Petersburg State University; 2008. (In Russ.).
Carrard I, Argyrides M, Ioannou X, et al. Associations between body dissatisfaction, importance of appearance, and aging anxiety with depression, and appearance-related behaviors in women in mid-life. Journal of Women and Aging. 2019;21:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2019.1681882
Libina A. Psychology of a modern woman. Moscow: Eksmo; 2003. (In Russ.).
Izard CE. Psychology of emotions. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2006 (In Russ.).
Yaremenko SN. The appearance of a person in culture. Rostov-on-Don: Publishing Center of DSTU; 1997. (In Russ.).
Hashim PW, Nia JK, Taliercio M, et al. Ideals of facial beauty. Cutis. 2017; 100(4):222-224.
Swami V, Weis L, Barron D, et al. Positive body image is positively associated with hedonic (emotional) and eudaimonic (psychological and social) well-being in British adults. The Journal of Social Psychology. 2018;158(5): 541-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1392278
Swami V, Tovée MJ. The impact of psychological stress on men’s judgements of female body size. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42593. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042593
Halsey LG, Huber JW, Bufton RDJ. et al. An explanation for enhanced perceptions of attractiveness after alcohol consumption. Alcohol. 2010;44(4); 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2010.02.001
Bowdring MA, Sayette MA. Perception of physical attractiveness when consuming and not consuming alcohol: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2018 Apr 16. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14227
DeBrune LM, Jones BC, Perett DI. Women’s attractiveness of self-resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior. 2005; 47(4):379-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.006
Zhu Q, Kou H, Bi TY. Processing mechanism of social cues in faces. Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2019;71(1):73-85.
Peterson RD, Palmer CL. Effects of physical attractiveness of political beliefs. Politics and the Life Sciences. 2017;36(2):3-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2017.18
Kranz D, Nadarevic L, Erdfelder E. Bald and bad? Experimental evidence for a dual process account of baldness stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2019;66(5):340-354. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000457
Cash TF, Kilcullen RN. The aye of the beholder: susceptibility to sexism and beautyism in the evaluation of managerial applicants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1985;15:591-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00903.x
Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallam M, Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin. 2000 May;126(3):390-423. PMID: 10825783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
Maestripieri D, Henry A, Nickels N. Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2017;40:e19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000340
Sigall H. Beautiful but dangerous: effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridical judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975;31:410-414. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076472
Zaidel DW, Bava S, Reis VA. Relationship between facial asymmetry and judging trust worthiness in faces. Laterality. 2003;8(3):225-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500244000120
Schein SS, Langlois JH. Unattractive infant faces elicit negative affect from adults. Infant Behavior and Development. 2015;38:130-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.12.009
Fromm E. Man for himself. The revolution of hope. To have or to be. Moscow: AST; 2007. (In Russ.).
Guest E, Costa B, Williamson H, et al. The effectiveness of interventions aiming to promote positive body image in adults: a systematic review. Body Image. 2019;30:10-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.04.002.
Bagnenko ES. The system of significant relationships of women seeking cosmetological help. Obozrenie psikhiatrii i meditsinskoj psikhologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva. 2012;3:42-47. (In Russ.).
Balkrishnan R, McMichael AJ, Hu JY, et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in women with severe facial blemishes. International Journal of Dermatology. 2006;45(2):111-115.
Sadick NS. The impact of cosmetic interventions on quality of life. Dermatology Online Journal. 2008;14(8):2.
Asimakopoulou E, Zavrides H, Askitis T. Plastic surgery on body image, body satisfaction and self-esteem. Acta Chirurgiae Plasticae. 2020;61(1-4):3-9. PMID: 32380836.
Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2011;366(1571):1638-1659. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0404
Bueller H. Ideal facial relationships and goals. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2018; 34(5):458-465. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669401
Petlenko VP. The main methodological problems of the theoru of medicine. Leningrad; 1982. (In Russ.).
Espinas AV. The social life of animals: the experience of comparative psychology. Moscow: LIBROCOM; 2012. (In Russ.).
Samson N, Fink B, Matts PJ. Visible skin condition and perception of human facial appearance. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2010;32(3): 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2494.2009.00535.x
Brierley ME, Brooks KR, Mond J, et al. The body and the beautiful: health, asttractiveness and body composition in men’s and women’s bodies. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0156722. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156722
Weeden J, Sabini J. Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: a review. Psychological Bulletin. 2005;131(5);635-653. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.635
Bueller H. Ideal facial relationships and goals. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2018; 34(5):458-465. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669401
Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology. 2006;57:199-226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
Milutinovic J, Zelic K, Nedeljkovoc N. Evaluation of facial beauty using antropometric proportions. The Scientific World Journal. 2014;20:428250. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/428250
Fisher ML, Voracek M. The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2006;5(2):190-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-2165.2006.00249.x
Swami V, Tovée MJ. The impact of psychological stress on men’s judgements of female body size. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42593. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042593
Cellerino A. Psychobiology of facial attractiveness. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 2003;26(3 Suppl):45-48.
Lephart E.D. A review of the role of estrogen in dermal aging and facial attractiveness in women. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2018;17(3):282-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12508
Lephart ED. Human scalp hair: modulation by various factors and hormones do estrogens inhibit or stimulate: a perplexing perspective. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2019;18(6):1860-1865. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12888
Whitehead RD, Ozakinci G, Perrett DI. Attractive skin coloration: harnessing sexual selection to improve diet and health. Evolutionary Psychology. 2012;10(5):842-854.
Dion KK. Young children’s stereotyping of facial attractiveness. Developmental Psychology. 1973;9:183-188.
Jacobson AS, Trivers R, Palestis BG. Number of friends and self-perception among Jamaican children: the role of attractiveness and fluctuating asymmetry. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2020;52(2):184-197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932019000373
Langlois JH, Ritter JM, Roggman LA, et al. Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Developmental Psychology. 1991;27:79-84. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.79
Ngaage M, Agius M. The psychology of scars: a mini-review. Psychiatria Danubina. 2018;30(Suppl 7):633-638.
Šitum M, Kolić M, Buljan M. Psychodermatology. Acta Medica Croatica. 2016;70 (Suppl 1):35-38.
Zaidel DW. Neuroesthetics is not just about art. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015;9:80. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00080
Swami V, Laughton R, Grover S, Furnham A. Asexuality is inversely associated with positive body image in British adults. Heliyon. 2019 Sept 12; 5(9):e02452. PMID: 31538116; PMCID: PMC6745407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02452
Valentova JV, Kleisner K, Havlíček J, Neustupa J. Shape differences between the faces of homosexual and heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2014 Feb;43(2):353-361. Epub 2013 Oct 17. PMID: 24132775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0194-x
Sorokowska A. Seeing or smelling? Assessing personality on the basis of different stimuli. Personality and Individual Differences. 2013;55:175-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.026
Lundström JN, Olsson MJ. Functional neuronal processing of human body odors. Vitamins and Hormones. 2010;83:1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0083-6729(10)83001-8
Sergeant MJ. Female perception of male body odor. Vitamins and Hormones. 2010;83:25-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0083-6729(10)83002-X
Valentova JV, Varella MA, Havlíček J, Kleisner K. Positive association between vocal and facial attractiveness in women but not in men: A cross-cultural study. Behavioural Processes. 2017 Feb;135:95-100. Epub 2016 Dec 14. PMID: 27986472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.005
Walter KV, Conroy-Beam D, Buss DM, et al. Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: a large-scale replication. Psychological Science. 2020;31(4):408-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904154