The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Derevyanchenko S.P.

Volgograd State Medical University

Sevbitov A.V.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Utyuzh A.S.

Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health

Kireev V.V.

Rostov State Medical University

Dorofeev A.E.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Enina Yu.I.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Analysis of the quality of fit of restorations in the cervical region of teeth in vivo

Authors:

Derevyanchenko S.P., Sevbitov A.V., Utyuzh A.S., Kireev V.V., Dorofeev A.E., Enina Yu.I.

More about the authors

Read: 409 times


To cite this article:

Derevyanchenko SP, Sevbitov AV, Utyuzh AS, Kireev VV, Dorofeev AE, Enina YuI. Analysis of the quality of fit of restorations in the cervical region of teeth in vivo. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2024;8(4):5‑10. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/operhirurg202480415

References:

  1. Badavannavar AN, Ajari S, Nayak KUS, Khijmatgar S. Abfraction: Etiopathogenesis, clinical aspect, and diagnostic-treatment modalities: A review. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31(2):305-311. 
  2. Dioguardi M, Polverari D, Spirito F. Introspection of the Etiopathological Mechanisms Underlying Noncarious Cervical Lesions: Analysis of the Different Theories and Their Impact on the Mineralized Structures of the Tooth. Int J Dent. 2023;2023:8838314.
  3. Fang K, Chen K, Shi M, Wang L. Effect of different adhesive systems on dental defects and sensitivity to teeth in composite resin restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(6):2495-2511.
  4. Goodacre CJ, Eugene Roberts W, Munoz CA. Noncarious cervical lesions: Morphology and progression, prevalence, etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical guidelines for restoration. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(2):e1-e18. 
  5. Lührs AK, Jacker-Guhr S, Günay H, Herrmann P. Composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions-Which cavity preparation is clinically reliable? Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020;6(5):558-567. 
  6. Nota A, Pittari L, Paggi M, Abati S, Tecco S. Correlation between Bruxism and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disorder and Their Effects on Tooth Wear. A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(4):1107.
  7. Kaisarly D, ElGezawi M, Haridy R. Reliability of Class II Bulk-fill Composite Restorations With and Without Veneering: A Two-year Randomized Clinical Control Study. Oper Dent. 2021;46(5):491-504. 
  8. Pilcher L, Pahlke S, Urquhart O. Direct materials for restoring caries lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis-a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2023;154(2):e1-e98. 
  9. Roberts WE, Mangum JE, Schneider PM. Pathophysiology of Demineralization, Part I: Attrition, Erosion, Abfraction, and Noncarious Cervical Lesions. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2022;20(1):90-105. 
  10. Enina YI, V AV, Dorofeev AE, Ershov KA, Pustokhina IG. Comparison of the strength characteristics of direct and indirect dental restorations under uniaxial compression. Rossiiskii stomatologicheskii zhurnal. 2020;24(5):293-296. 
  11. Romanenko IG, Klemin VA, Moroz AB. Clinical evaluation of chewing teeth restorations performed by the sandwich method. Problemy stomatologii. 2023;19(2):39-43. 
  12. Soares CJ, Santana FR, Fonseca RB, Martins LR, Neto FH. In vitro analysis of the radiodensity of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems and its influence on the detection of cement overhangs. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11(4):331-336. 
  13. Teixeira DNR, Thomas RZ, Soares PV, Cune MS, Gresnigt MMM, Slot DE. Prevalence of noncarious cervical lesions among adults: A systematic review. J Dent. 2020;95:103285.
  14. Derevyanchenko SP, Makedonova YA, Klurfeld VD, Enina YI, Sevbitov AV, Kerobyan VI. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of restorations in the cervical region of teeth by direct and indirect method. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo Meditsinskogo Universiteta. 2023;20(4):44-48. 
  15. Peumans M, Van de Maele E, de Munck J, van Landuyt K, Van Meerbeek B. Fourteen-year Clinical Performance of a HEMA-free One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Non-carious Cervical Lesions. J Adhes Dent. 2023;25(1):147-158. 
  16. Peumans M, Vandormael S, Heeren A, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Six-year Clinical Performance of a 2-step Self-etch Adhesive in Noncarious Cervical Lesions. J Adhes Dent. 2021;23(3):201-215. 
  17. Sevbitov A, Kuznetsova M, Dorofeev A, Ershov K, Mitin N. A new modification of the dental prosthesis in the postoperative restoration of chewing function. Opcion. 2020;36(26):864-875. 
  18. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J. 1980;30(4):347-358. 
  19. Ferrari M, Koken S, Grandini S, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Joda T, Discepoli N. Influence of cervical margin relocation (CMR) on periodontal health: 12-month results of a controlled trial. J Dent. 2018;69:70-76. 
  20. Warreth A, Abuhijleh E, Almaghribi MA, Mahwal G, Ashawish A. Tooth surface loss: A review of literature. Saudi Dent J. 2020;32(2):53-60. 

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.