The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Kolsanov A.V.

Samara State Medical University

Murushidi M.Yu.

IDK Medical company

Korolev D.G.

IDK Medical company

Methods for navigating access to the kidney in percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy

Authors:

Kolsanov A.V., Murushidi M.Yu., Korolev D.G.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2020;4(3): 37‑43

DOI: 10.17116/operhirurg2020403137

Views: 3819

Downloaded: 224

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

To cite this article:

Kolsanov AV, Murushidi MYu, Korolev DG. Methods for navigating access to the kidney in percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2020;4(3):37‑43. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/operhirurg2020403137

МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata

The article highlights the latest data on access methods for percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (PNLL), as well as the identified advantages and disadvantages of each navigation method. The data for the review was collected by searching the PubMed and eLibrary databases, in the main clinical journals in English and Russian. Although PNLL is the treatment of choice for large renal and urinary calculi, a uniform approach to imaging has not yet been developed. It can be summarized that the current application of various methods depends on the equipment of the clinic, the experience of the doctor and the clinical situation. Information about all methods used for puncture of the urinary system of the kidneys is extremely relevant and will allow doctors to use different approaches depending on the clinical situation and the individual characteristics of the patient.

Keywords:

percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy
nephrolithotripsy
nephrolithiasis
renal approach
imaging methods

Authors:

Kolsanov A.V.

Samara State Medical University

Murushidi M.Yu.

IDK Medical company

Korolev D.G.

IDK Medical company

Received:

31.01.2020

Accepted:

27.02.2020

List of references:

  1. Alyaev YuG, Grigoryan VA, Rudenko VI, Grigor’ev NA, Enikeev ME, Sorokin NI. Modern technologies in the diagnosis and treatment of urolithiasis. M.: Litterra; 2007. (In Russ.).
  2. Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10:257-259.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084
  3. Segura W, Patterson OE, Le Roy AJ. Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1000 cases. J Urol. 1985;1134:1077-1081.
  4. Morozov AV, Martov AG. Removal of kidney and ureter stones via nephrostomy fistula. Urologiya i nefrologiya. 1985;4:30. (In Russ.).
  5. Rogachikov VV, Nesterov SN, Il’chenko DN, Tevlin KP, Kudryashov AV. Percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: past, present, future... Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2016;2:58-66. (In Russ.).
  6. Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A. Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Association of Urology. 2012. https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/20_Urolithiasis_LR-March-13-2012.pdf
  7. Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Tepeler A. EUA Nephrolithiasis Guidelines. Accessed 23 Jan 2020. https://uroweb.org/guideline/2017%20Nephrolithiasis%20guidelines/
  8. Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Gadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. The «mini perc» technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 1998;16:371-374.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199904020-00490
  9. De la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R. The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011;25:11-17.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0424
  10. Sharma G, Sharma A, Maheshwari P. Predictive value of decreased renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter in prone position for prenatally detected hydronephrosis. J Urol. 2012;187:1839-1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.093
  11. Gücük A, Üyetürk U. Usefulness of hounsfield unit and density in the assessment and treatment of urinary stones. World J Nephrol. 2014;3:282-286.  https://doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.282
  12. Vicentini FC, Gomes CM, Danilovic AA, Neto EA, Mazzucchi E, Srougi M. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: current concepts. Indian J Urol. 2009;25:4-10.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.44281
  13. De la Rosette JJ, Tsakiris P, Ferrandino MN, Elsakka AM, Rioja J, Preminger GM. Beyond prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comprehensive review. Eur Urol. 2008;54:1262-1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.012
  14. Mousavi-Bahar SH, Mehrabi S, Moslemi MK. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications in 671 consecutive patients: a single-center experience. Urology J. 2008;8(4):271-276. 
  15. Derisavifard S, Hartman C, Gupta N, Hoenig D, Okeke Z, Smith A. New developments in percutaneous stone surgery. Afr J Urol. 2016;22:141-148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afju.2016.04.002
  16. Zhang W, Zhou T, Wu T, Gao X, Peng Y, Xu C. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole renal stones: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Endourol. 2015;29:745-759.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0799
  17. Korets R, Graversen JA, Kates M, Mues AC, Gupta M. Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy systemic inflammatory response: a prospective analysis of preoperative urine, renal pelvic urine and stone cultures. J Urol. 2011;186(5):1899-1903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.064
  18. Hwang TK. Percutaneous nephroscopic surgery. Korean J Urol. 2010;51:298-307.  https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.5.298
  19. Ritter M, Krombach P, Michel MS. Percutaneous stone removal. Eur Urol. Suppl. 2011;10:433-439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eursup.2011.07.005
  20. Ozden E, Mercimek MN, Bostanci Y, Yakupoglu YK, Sirtbas A, Sarikaya S. Long-term outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with chronic kidney disease: a single-center experience. Urology. 2012;79(5):990-994.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.066
  21. Scoffone CM, Hoznek A, Cracco CM Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ECIRS: the new way of interpreting PNL. Springer-Verlag, France. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0459-0
  22. Valdivia JD, Valle J, Villarroya S, López JA, Bayo A, Lanchares E, et al. Why is percutaneous nephroscopy still performed with the patients prone? J Endourol. 1990;4:269-272.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1990.4.269
  23. Borzouei B, Habibollah S, Bahar M. Results of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy under spinal anaesthesia. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 2012;6:5-20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.023
  24. Siev M, Motamedinia P, Leavitt D, Fakhoury M, Barcohana K, Hoenig D. Does peak inspiratory pressure increase in the prone position? An analysis related to body mass index. J Urol. 2015;194:1302-1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.05.015
  25. Ozden E, Mercimek MN, Bostanci Y, Yakupoglu YK, Sirtbas A, Sarikaya S. Long-term outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with chronic kidney disease: a single-center experience. Urology. 2012;79(5):990-994.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.066
  26. Yuan D, Liu Y, Rao H, Cheng T, Sun Z, Wang Y. Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2016;30:754-763.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0402
  27. Gofrit ON, Shapiro A, Donchin Y, Bloom AI, Shenfeld OZ, Landau EH. Lateral decubitus position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the morbidly obese or kyphotic patient. J Endourol. 2002;16:383-386.  https://doi.org/10.1089/089277902760261437
  28. Ghani KR, Andonian S, Bultitude M, Desai M, Giusti G, Okhunov Z. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: update, trends, and future directions. Eur Urol. 2016;70:382-396.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.047
  29. Ferrandino MN, Bagrodia A, Pierre SA, Scales CD Jr., Rampersaud E, Pearle MS. Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers. J Urol. 2009;181:668-672.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.012
  30. Neisius A, Wang AJ, Wang C, Nguyen G, Tsivian M, Kuntz NJ. Radiation exposure in urology: a genitourinary catalogue for diagnostic imaging. J Urol. 2013;190:2117-2123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.013
  31. Rob S, Bryant T, Wilson I, Somani BK. Ultra-low-dose, low-dose, and standard-dose CT of the kidney, ureters, and bladder: is there a difference? Results from a systematic review of the literature. Clin Radiol. 2017;72:11-15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.10.005
  32. Schilling D, Gakis G, Walcher U, Stenzl A, Nagele U. The learning curve in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: a 1-year retrospective evaluation of a novice and an expert. World J Urol. 2011;29(6):749-753.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-010-0553-3
  33. Allen D, O’Brien T, Tiptath R, Glass J. Defining the Learning Curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2005;19(3):279-282.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2005.19.279
  34. Lee CL, Anderson JK, Monga M. Residency training in percutaneous renal access: does it affect urological practice? J Urol. 2004;171(1):592-595.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000104849.25168.6d
  35. Dewes P, Frellesen C, Scholtz JE, Fischer S, Vogl TJ, Bauer RW. Low-dose abdominal computed tomography for detection of urinary stone disease — impact of additional spectral shaping of the X-ray beam on image quality and dose parameters. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:1058-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.016
  36. Spann A, Poteet J, Hyatt D, Chiles L, Desouza R, Venable D. Safe and effective obtainment of access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy by urologists: the Louisiana State University experience. J Endourol. 2011;25:1421-1425. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0643
  37. Aslam MZ, Thwaini A, Duggan B. Urologists versus radiologists made PCNL tracts: the U.K. experience. Urol Res. 2011;39:217-221.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0338-6
  38. Tomaszewski JJ, Ortiz TD, Gayed BA, Smaldone MC, Jackman SV, Averch TD. Renal access by urologist or radiologist during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2010;24:1733-1737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1169
  39. Watterson JD, Soon S, Jana K. Access related complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: urology versus radiology at a single academic institution. J Urol. 2006;176:142-145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(06)00489-7
  40. El-Assmy AM, Shokeir AA, Mohsen T, El-Tabey N, El-Nahas AR, Shoma AM. Renal access by urologist or radiologist for percutaneous nephrolithotomy — is it still an issue? J Urol. 2007;178:916-920.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.015
  41. Armitage JN, Withington J, van der Meulen J. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in England: practice and outcomes described in the Hospital Episode Statistics database. BJU Int. 2014;113:777-782.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12373
  42. Miller NL, Matlaga BR, Lingeman JE. Techniques for fluoroscopic percutaneous renal access. J Urol. 2007;178:15-23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.014
  43. Fulgham PF, Assimos DG, Pearle MS, Preminger GM. Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol. 2013;189:1203-1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.031
  44. Hatipoglu NK, Bodakci MN, Penbegül N, Bozkurt Y, Sancaktutar AA, Atar M. Monoplanar access technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis. 2013;41:257-263.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0557-8
  45. Sharma GR, Maheshwari PN, Sharma AG, Maheshwari RP, Heda RS, Maheshwari SP. Fluoroscopy guided percutaneous renal access in prone position. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3:245-264.  https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i3.245
  46. Sorensen MD, Harper JD, Hsi RS, Shah AR, Dighe MK, Carter SJ. B-mode ultrasound versus color Doppler twinkling artifact in detecting kidney stones. J Endourol. 2013;27:149-153.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0430
  47. Sternberg KM, Eisner B, Larson T, Hernandez N, Han J, Pais VM. Ultrasonography significantly overestimates stone size when compared to low-dose, noncontrast computed tomography. Urology. 2016;95:67-71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.002
  48. Tzou DT, Usawachintachit M, Taguchi K, Chi T. Ultrasound use in urinary stones: adapting old technology for a modern-day disease. J Endourol. 2017;31(1):89-94.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0584
  49. Li ZC, Li K, Zhan HL, Chen K, Gu J, Wang L. Augmenting intraoperative ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance planning models for percutaneous renal access. Biomed Eng Online. 2012;11:60.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925x-11-60
  50. Rodrigues PL, Rodrigues NF, Fonseca J, Lima E, Vilaça JL. Kidney targeting and puncturing during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: recent advances and future perspectives. J Endourol. 2013;27:826-834.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0740
  51. Waingankar N, Hayek S, Smith AD, Okeke Z. Calyceal diverticula: a comprehensive review. Rev Urol. 2014;16:29-43. 
  52. Srivastava A, Chipde SS, Mandhani A, Kapoor RR, Ansari MS. Percutaneous management of renal calyceal diverticular stones: ten-year experience of a tertiary care center with different techniques to deal with diverticula after stone extraction. Indian J Urol. 2013;29:273-276.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.120091
  53. Grasso M, Lang G, Taylor FC. Flexible ureteroscopically assisted percutaneous renal access. Tech Urol. 1995;1:39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00006-2
  54. Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M, Sharma R, Stief CG, Desai M. The «all-seeing needle»: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2011;59:1054-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1569-9056(11)60137-1
  55. Isac W, Rizkala E, Liu X, Noble M, Monga M. Endoscopic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis. Urology. 2013;81:251-256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.004
  56. Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Yoshida M, Ogawa T, Uemura H. Ureteroscopy assisted retrograde nephrostomy: a new technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). BJU Int. 2012;110:588-590.  https://doi.org/10.1089/vid.2011.0082
  57. Rassweiler JJ, Müller M, Fangerau M, Klein J, Goezen A.S., Pereira P. iPad-assisted percutaneous access to the kidney using marker-based navigation: initial clinical experience. Eur Urol. 2011;61:628-631.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.024
  58. Thorsten J, Rassweiler KJ, Rassweiler MC Validation of a Novel Cost Effective Easy to Produce and Durable In Vitro Model for Kidney-Puncture and Percutaneous Nephrolitholapaxy — Simulation. J Endourol. 2018;32(9):871-876.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0834
  59. Kolsanov AV, Ivanova VD, Lineva OI. Development and implementation of Russian simulation and virtual technologies in the modern educational process. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2016;7:83-87. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2016.7.83-87
  60. Chaplygin S.S. Avtoplan — programmno-apparatnyi kompleks dlya planirovaniya i khirurgicheskoi navigatsii [Elektronnyi resurs]. Data obrashcheniya 23.01.20.  https://autoplan.clinic/
  61. Kolsanov AV, Manukyan AA, Zel’ter PM, Chaplygin SS, Kapishnikov AV. Virtual simulation of liver surgery based on computed tomography. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2016;21(4):16-22. (In Russ.).
  62. Ritter M, Rassweiler M, Michel MS. The Uro Dyna-CT enables three-dimensional planned laser-guided complex punctures. Eur Urol. 2015;68:880-884.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.005
  63. Cabrera FJ, Kaplan AG, Youssef RF, Tsivian M, Shin RH, Scales CD. Digital tomosynthesis: a viable alternative to noncontrast computed tomography for the follow-up of nephrolithiasis? J Endourol. 2016;30:366-370.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0271
  64. Li R, Li T, Qian X, QI J, WU D, Liu J. Real-time ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy using SonixGPS navigation: clinical experience and practice in a single center in China. J Endourol. 2015;29:158-161.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0302
  65. Simpfendörfer T, Franz A, Seitel A, Bopp N, Gasch C, Hohenfellner M. Introducing a combined ultrasound and electromagnetic tracking device for navigated sonographic kidney puncture. J Urol. 2017;197:e815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.1900
  66. Tepeler A, Akman T, Silay MS, Akcay M, Ersoz C, Kalkan S. Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure during micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy and conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis. 2014;42:275-279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1569-9056(13)61770-4

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.