New way to select analytical performance specifications based on the state-of-the-art

Moshkin A.V.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/labs20221104139

Moshkin A.V.

Association of Experts and Organizations of the Laboratory Service “Federation of Laboratory Medicine”

ORCID: 0000-0002-9965-4578

New way to select analytical performance specifications based on the state-of-the-art

Authors:

Moshkin A.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Laboratory Service. 2022;11(4): 39‑45

DOI: 10.17116/labs20221104139

Read: 1021 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Moshkin AV. New way to select analytical performance specifications based on the state-of-the-art. Laboratory Service. 2022;11(4):39‑45. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/labs20221104139

Подписка 2025 Лабораторная служба (Laboratory Service)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Abstract:

This publication has two purposes: to draw the attention of colleagues to the new possibilities of using the model the «state-of-the-art» to select analytical performance specifications and to try to understand why the use of analytical performance specifications is still a rare practice in our laboratories.

Keywords:

analytical performance specifications

independent models

model «state-of-the-art»

Authors:

Moshkin A.V.

Association of Experts and Organizations of the Laboratory Service “Federation of Laboratory Medicine”

ORCID: 0000-0002-9965-4578

Received:

22.11.2022

Accepted:

16.12.2022

Close metadata

References:

SO 15189:2015 «Medical laboratories — Requirements for quality and competence (IDT)»
Ceriotti F, Fernandez-Calle P, Klee GG, Nordin G, Sandberg S, Streichert T, et al. Criteria for assigning laboratory measurands to models for analytical performance specifications defined in the 1st EFLM Strategic Conference. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55(2):189-194. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0091
Ceriotti F, Fernandez-Calle P, Klee GG, Nordin G, Sandberg S, Streichert T, Vives-Corrons J-L, Panteghini M. Criteria for assigning laboratory me asurands to models for analytical performance specifications defined in the 1st EFLM Strategic Conference. Laboratory Service=Laboratornaya sluzhba. 2019;8(1):93—100. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/labs2019801193
https://biologicalvariation.eu/bv_specifications/measurand
https://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm
Gutiérrez G, Jou J, Barceló B, Blázquez R, Morancho J, Ramón F, et al. Aplicación práctica de las especificaciones mínimas de la calidad analítica obtenidas por consenso. Rev Lab Clin. 2013;6:68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labcli.2013.01.005
Blázquez R, Prada E, Ricós C, Gutiérrez-Bassini G, Morancho J, Salas Á, Jou JM, Ramón F. Consensus minimum analytical performance specifications of inter-laboratory comparisons: agreement among Spanish EQAP organizers. Revista de Calidad Asistencial. 2015;30(6):341-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cali.2015.06.006
https://www.westgard.com/consolidated-goals-immunoassay.htm
Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Quality control review: implementing a scientifically based quality control system. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry. 2016;53(1):32-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563215597248
C24 4th Ed. Statistical Quality Control for Quantitative Measurement Procedures. Principles and Definitions. https://clsi.org/standards/products/clinical-chemistry-and-toxicology/documents/c24/
JCGM. International vocabulary of metrology — Basic and general concepts and associated terms. 3rd ed; 2012. www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_200_2012.pdf