The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Vis J.Y.

Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands

Huisman A.

Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands

Verification and quality control of routine hematology analyzers

Authors:

Vis J.Y., Huisman A.

More about the authors

Journal: Laboratory Service. 2018;7(1): 30‑39

Read: 5278 times


To cite this article:

Vis JY, Huisman A. Verification and quality control of routine hematology analyzers. Laboratory Service. 2018;7(1):30‑39. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/labs20187130-39

Recommended articles:

References:

  1. Davis BH, Barnes PW. Automated cell analysis: principles. In: Laboratory Hematology Practice. Kottke-Marchant K (ed). Oxford, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2012;26-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444398595.ch3
  2. Bene MC, Lacombe F. Differential leukocyte analysis. In: Laboratory Hematology Practice. Kottke-Marchant K (ed). Oxford, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2012;33-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444398595.ch4
  3. Green R, Wachsmann-Hogiu S. Development, history, and future of automated cell counters. Clin Lab Med. 2015; 35:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2014.11.003
  4. Buttarello M. Quality specification in haematology: the automated blood cell count. Clin Chim Acta. 2004;346:45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cccn.2004.02.038
  5. Buttarello M, Plebani M. Automated blood cell counts: state of the art. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130:104-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cccn.2004.02.038
  6. Briggs C, Culp N, Davis B, d’Onofrio G, Zini G, Machin SJ. ICSH guidelines for the evaluation of blood cell analysers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting. Int J Lab Hematol. 2014;36:613-627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2257.1994.tb00402.x
  7. Rabinovitch A, Barnes P, Curcio KM, Dorman J, Huisman A, Nguyen L, O’Neil P. Validation, Verification, and Quality Assurance of Automated Hematology Analyzers; H26-A2. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010. ISSN 0273-3099, ISBN 1-56238-728-6 https://clsi.org/media/1398/h26a2
  8. ISO. Medical Laboratories — Particular Requirements for Quality and Competence ISO 15189. Geneva: ISO; 2012. https://www.iso.org/standard/56115.html
  9. Verbrugge SE, Huisman A. Verification and standardization of blood cell counters for routine clinical laboratory tests. Clin Lab Med. 2015;35:183-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2014.10.008
  10. Briggs C. Quality counts: new parameters in blood cell counting. Int J Lab Hematol. 2009;31:277-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-553x.2009.01160.x
  11. Lecompte TP, Bernimoulin MP. Novel parameters in blood cell counters. Clin Lab Med. 2015;35:209-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2014.11.001
  12. McFarlane A, Aslan B, Raby A, Bourner G, Padmore R. Critical values in hematology. Int J Lab Hematol. 2015;37:36-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12226
  13. Schapkaitz E, Levy B. Critical limits for urgent clinician notification at South African intensive care units. Int J Lab Hematol. 2015;37:620-625. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12373
  14. Wong EC. Hematology analyzers: special considerations for pediatric patients. Clin Lab Med. 2015;35:165-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2014.10.010
  15. Briggs C. Evaluation of hematology analyzers. In: Laboratory Hematology Practice. Kottke-Marchant K (ed.). Oxford, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 2012;96-102. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444398595.ch9
  16. Ashenden M, Sharpe K, Plowman J, Allbon G, Lobigs L, Baron A, Gore CJ. Stability of athlete blood passport parameters during air freight. Int J Lab Hematol. 2014;36:505-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12178
  17. Longair I, Briggs C, Machin SJ. Performance evaluation of the Celltac F haematology analyser. Int J Lab Hematol. 2011;33:357-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-553x.2010.01294.x
  18. Joshi A, McVicker W, Segalla R, Favaloro E, Luu V, Vanniasinkam T. Determining the stability of complete blood count parameters in stored blood samples using the SYSMEX XE-5000 automated haematology analyser. Int J Lab Hematol. 2015;37:705-714. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12389
  19. Xiang D, Yue J, Lan Y, Sha C, Ren S, Li Y, Li M, Wang C. Evaluation of Mindray BC-5000 hematology analyzer: a new miniature 5-part WBC differential instrument. Int J Lab Hematol. 2015;37:597-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12370
  20. Bruegel M, Nagel D, Funk M, Fuhrmann P, Zander J, Teupser D. Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:1057-1071. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-0945
  21. Seo JY, Lee ST, Kim SH. Performance evaluation of the new hematology analyzer Sysmex XN-series. Int J Lab Hematol. 2015;37:155-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12254
  22. Grillone R, Grimaldi E, Scopacasa F, Dente B. Evaluation of the fully automated hematological analyzer Mindray BC 6800: comparison with Horiba ABX Pentra DX120. Int J Lab Hematol. 2014;36:e55-e58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12164
  23. Briggs C, Longair I, Kumar P, Singh D, Machin SJ. Performance evaluation of the Sysmex haematology XN modular system. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:1024-1030. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200930
  24. Hedley BD, Keeney M, Chin-Yee I, Brown W. Initial performance evaluation of the Uni-Cel(R) DxH 800 Coulter(R) cellular analysis system. Int J Lab Hematol. 2011;33:45-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-553x.2010.01239.x
  25. Hotton J, Broothaers J, Swaelens C, Cantinieaux B. Performance and abnormal cell flagging comparisons of three automated blood cell counters: Cell-Dyn Sapphire, DxH-800, and XN-2000. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;140:845-852. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpe5r4soqbuulz
  26. Jean A, Boutet C, Lenormand B, Callat MP, Buchonnet G, Barbay V, Basuyau JP, Vasse M. The new haematology analyzer DxH 800: an evaluation of the analytical performances and leucocyte flags, comparison with the LH 755. Int J Lab Hematol. 2011; 33:138–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-553x.2010.01257.x
  27. Kang SH, Kim HK, Ham CK, Lee DS, Cho HI. Comparison of four hematology analyzers, CELL-DYN Sapphire, ADVIA 120, Coulter LH 750, and Sysmex XE-2100, in terms of clinical usefulness. Int J Lab Hematol. 2008;30:480-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-553x.2007.00981.x
  28. Meintker L, Ringwald J, Rauh M, Krause SW. Comparison of automated differential blood cell counts from Abbott Sapphire, Siemens Advia 120, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, and Sysmex XE-2100 in normal and pathologic samples. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;139:641-650. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcp7d8eczrxgwcg
  29. Leers MP, Goertz H, Feller A, Hoffmann JJ. Performance evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN Ruby and the Sysmex XT-2000i haematology analysers. Int J Lab Hematol. 2011;33:19-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-553x.2010.01230.x
  30. Perich C, Minchinela J, Ricos C, Fernandez-Calle P, Alvarez V, Domenech MV, Simon M, Biosca C, Boned B, Garcia-Lario JV, Cava F, Fernandez-Fernandez P, Fraser CG. Biological variation database: structure and criteria used for generation and update. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:299-305. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-0739
  31. Ricos C, Alvarez V, Perich C, Fernandez-Calle P, Minchinela J, Cava F, Biosca C, Boned B, Domenech M, Garcia-Lario JV, Simon M, Fernandez PF, Diaz-Garzon J, Gonzalez-Lao E. Rationale for using data on biological variation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:863-870. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-1142
  32. Topic E, Nikolac N, Panteghini M, Theodorsson E, Salvagno GL, Miler M, et al. How to assess the quality of your analytical method? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:1707-1718. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0869
  33. Koepke AA, vanAssendelft OW, Brindza LJ, Davis BH, Fernandes BJ, Gewirtz AS, Rabinovitch A. Reference Leukocyte (WBC) Differential Count (Proportional) and Evaluation of Instrumental Methods. H20-A2. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2007. https://clsi.org/standards/products/hematology/documents/h20/
  34. Tan BT, Nava AJ, George TI. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800, Beckman Coulter LH 780, and Abbott Diagnostics Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers on adult specimens in a tertiary care hospital. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135:939-951. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcp1v3uxeiqtsle
  35. Tan BT, Nava AJ, George TI. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800 and Abbott Diagnostics Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers on pediatric and neonatal specimens in a tertiary care hospital. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135:929-938. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcp2exnslggrvsq
  36. Armbruster DA, Pry T. Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008;29(Suppl. 1):S49-S52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563215575560
  37. Grimaldi E, Scopacasa F. Evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 4000 hematology analyzer. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113:497-505. https://doi.org/10.1309/L7LC-6KKJ-12G2-196W
  38. Cembrowski GS. Hematology quality practices. In: Laboratory Hematology Practice. Kottke-Marchant K (ed). Oxford, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2012;686-706. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444398595.ch54
  39. Cembrowski GS, Clarke G. Quality control of automated cell counters. Clin Lab Med. 2015;35:59-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2014.10.006
  40. Huisman A. Discrepancy in hemoglobin results between automated analyzers caused by differences in hemoglobin standardization [abstract]. Int J Lab Hematol. 2014;36(Suppl. 1):128.
  41. de Vooght KM, Groenendaal F, Bierings MB, van Solinge WW, Huisman A. Falsely elevated point-of-care hematocrit and calculated hemoglobin concentration due to extreme leukocytosis. Ann Hematol. 2014;93:1949-1950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-014-2092-2
  42. Boonen KJ, Curvers J, Timmerman AA, Steurs D, van de Kerkhof D. Trueness in the measurement of haemoglobin: consensus or reference method? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012;50:511-514. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.784

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.