Clinical application of microfocused ultrasound portable device for facial rejuvenation

Kalashnikova N.G.; Murakov S.V.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/klinderma20242301182

Kalashnikova N.G.

«Linline» Clinic Chain

ORCID: 0000-0001-5250-9288

Murakov S.V.

Academy of Postgraduate Education under Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia;
Lotos 288, LLC

ORCID: 0000-0003-4330-2570

Clinical application of microfocused ultrasound portable device for facial rejuvenation

Authors:

Kalashnikova N.G., Murakov S.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2024;23(1): 82‑93

DOI: 10.17116/klinderma20242301182

Read: 950 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Kalashnikova NG, Murakov SV. Clinical application of microfocused ultrasound portable device for facial rejuvenation. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2024;23(1):82‑93. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/klinderma20242301182

Подписка 2026 Клиническая дерматология и венерология (Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of microfocused ultrasound (MFU) application for facial rejuvenation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study involved 10 women aged between 35 and 72 years with age-related facial changes of varying severity, including reduced skin tone, wrinkles, soft tissue ptosis. Patients have undergone one MFU procedure in the face and submandibular areas. The total number of lines for each patient was 650-800. The procedure did not require pre-treatment and was performed after skin cleansing. Gel of medium viscosity was applied for ultrasound therapy. Anesthesia was not used. Photocontrol and ultrasound of the treated areas were performed after the procedure. The results were evaluated using a blind method with the involvement of 3 independent cosmetologists based on the photographs provided before and 1 month after the intervention in accordance with the Physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (PGAIS). Patients also self-assessed the results after the conducted correction on the basis of a similar scale for patients (SGAIS). The pain was evaluated using a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The follow-up period was 1 month after the procedure.

RESULTS

The effect of soft tissues lifting was observed immediately after MFU impact followed by a subsequent growth of positive effect in all 10 patients. US scanning showed an increase in echogenic density at the dermal and subdermal levels in all studied areas, which is an objective confirmation of the impact depth correctness. The mean value of pain assessment was 2.2 points.

CONCLUSION

The use of the portable MFU device makes it possible to rejuvenate face by soft tissues lifting and reducing wrinkles severity. A high level of patients’ satisfaction with the achieved aesthetic result is observed. The procedure is characterized by the mild pain or its absence, favorable safety profile and early appearance of positive clinical results.

Keywords:

lifting

microfocused ultrasound

facial tissues rejuvenation

Authors:

Kalashnikova N.G.

«Linline» Clinic Chain

ORCID: 0000-0001-5250-9288

Murakov S.V.

Academy of Postgraduate Education under Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia;
Lotos 288, LLC

ORCID: 0000-0003-4330-2570

Received:

08.12.2023

Accepted:

17.12.2023

Close metadata

References:

ISAPS 2022 Global Survey Results. Accessed Dec 1, 2023. https://www.isaps.org/discover/about-isaps/global-statistics/reports-and-press-releases/global-survey-2022-full-report-and-press-releases/.
Kim KH, Geronemus RG. Nonablative laser and light therapies for skin rejuvenation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6(6):398-409. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.6.6.398
Herne KB, Zachary CB. New facial rejuvenation techniques. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2000;19(4):221-231. https://doi.org/10.1053/sder.2000.18362
Pak CS, Lee YK, Jeong JH, et al. Safety and efficacy of ulthera in the rejuvenation of aging lower eyelids: a pivotal clinical trial. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38(5):861-868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0383-6
Ayatollahi A, Gholami J, Saberi M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for face and neck rejuvenation. Lasers Med Sci. 2020;35:1007-1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-02957-9
Contini M, Hollander MHJ, Vissink A, Schepers RH, Jansma J, Schortinghuis J. A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Microfocused Ultrasound for Facial Skin Tightening. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021522
Oni G, Hoxworth R, Teotia S, Brown S, Kenkel JM. Evaluation of a microfocused ultrasound system for improving skin laxity and tightening in the lower face. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(7):1099-1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X14541956
Casabona G, Kaye K. Facial Skin Tightening With Microfocused Ultrasound and Dermal Fillers: Considerations for Patient Selection and Outcomes. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(11):1075-1082.
Haar GT, Coussios C. High intensity focused ultrasound: physical principles and devices. Int J Hyperthermia. 2007;23(2):89-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656730601186138
Suh DH, Kim DH, Lim HK, Lee SJ, Song KY, Kim HS. Intense focused ultrasound (IFUS) with a modified parameter on facial tightening: a study on its safety and efficacy. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016;18(8):448-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2016.1225961
Fabi SG. Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization for Skin Tightening and Lifting. Dermatologic Surgery. 2014;40:164-167. https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000000233
Alam M, White LE, Martin N, et al. Ultrasound tightening of facial and neck 30. skin: a rater-blinded prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62:262-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.039
Minkis K, Alam M. Ultrasound skin tightening. Dermatol Clin. 2014;32:71-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2013.09.001
Lee TJ, Kim D, Kim T, et al. Rejuvenation of photoaged aged mouse skin using high-intensity focused ultrasound, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2022;75(10):3859-3868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.073
Sklar LR, El Tal AK, Kerwin LY. Use of transcutaneous ultrasound for lipolysis and skin tightening: a review. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38(2):429-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0286-6
Meyer PF, Meleck M, Borges F, Fortuny E, Farias SL, Caldas Afonso FA, Soares CD, Carreiro E de M, Valentim da Silva RM, Barbosa AL. Effect of Microfocused Ultrasound on Facial Rejuvenation: Clinical and Histological Evaluation. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines. 2021;9(7):112-125. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2021.97012
Kwon SH, Ahn GY, Lew BL, Shin JW, Na JI, Huh CH. Clinical Implication of the Regional Thickness of the Lower Facial Skin, Superficial Fat, and Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System on High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment. Dermatol Surg. 2022;48(5):527-531.
Kim Y, Yu H, An S, Ha D, Jung B. Handheld microfocused ultrasound device for facial lifting: A preliminary study of ULTIGHT. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(11):2982-2988. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15813
Gutowski KA. Microfocused Ultrasound for Skin Tightening. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43(3):577-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2016.03.012
Kalashnikova NG, Pozdeeva EV, Murakov SV. A combined approach to correcting age-related changes in the face: High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU), botulinum toxin, and hyaluronic acid fillers. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology = Klinichaskaya dermatologiya i venerologiya. 2023;22(3):346-356. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/klinderma202322031346
Lee TJ, Kim D, Kim T, Pak CJ, Suh HP, Hong JP. Rejuvenation of photoaged aged mouse skin using high-intensity focused ultrasound. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Oct;75(10):3859-3868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.073