The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Mardanyan G.V.

Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery

Vartanyan E.L.

Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery

Puretsky M.V.

Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery;
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Polyakov R.S.

Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery;
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Pirkova A.A.

Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery

Kudrinskiy A.V.

Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery

Kraynikov D.A.

Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery

Abugov S.A.

Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery;
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Prognostic value of modified Syntax Score in high- and medium-risk patients with multiple-vessel coronary artery disease and involvement of the left main coronary artery

Authors:

Mardanyan G.V., Vartanyan E.L., Puretsky M.V., Polyakov R.S., Pirkova A.A., Kudrinskiy A.V., Kraynikov D.A., Abugov S.A.

More about the authors

Read: 2064 times


To cite this article:

Mardanyan GV, Vartanyan EL, Puretsky MV, et al. . Prognostic value of modified Syntax Score in high- and medium-risk patients with multiple-vessel coronary artery disease and involvement of the left main coronary artery. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021;14(5):407‑412. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio202114051407

Recommended articles:

References:

  1. Abugov SA, Polyakov RS, Saakyan YuM, et al. Evolution of clinical and anatomical scores based on SYNTAX trial. Russian Journal of Endovascular Surgery. 2019;6:3:179-188. (In Russ.)/ https://doi.org/10.24183/2409-4080-2019-6-3-179-188
  2. https://www.syntaxscore.com. 
  3. Adrian P. Banning, Jens Flensted Lassen, Francesco Burzotta? et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for obstructive bifurcation lesions: the 14th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2019;15:90-98.  https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00144
  4. Tonino P, Fearon W, De Bruyne B? et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;25:2816-2821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096
  5. Dario Buccheri, Davide Piraino, Giuseppe Andolina, Bernardo Cortese. Understanding and managing in-stent restenosis: a review of clinical data, from pathogenesis to treatment. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:10:1150-1162. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2016.10.93
  6. Zbinden R, von Felten S, Wein B, et al. Impact of stent diameter and length on in-stent restenosis after DES vs BMS implantation in patients needing large coronary stents-A clinical and health-economic evaluation. Cardiovascular Therapeutics. 35;1:19-25.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-5922.12229
  7. Ankur Kalra, Hasan Rehman, Sahil Khera, et al. New-Generation Coronary Stents: Current Data and Future Directions. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-017-0654-1
  8. Bundhun PK, Pursun M, Teeluck AR, Long MY. Are everolimus-eluting stents associated with better clinical outcomes compared to other drug-eluting stents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:14:e3276. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003276
  9. Sarno G, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona G, Varenhorst C, Danielewicz M, Hambraeus K, et al. Real-life clinical outcomes with everolimus eluting platinum chromium stent with an abluminal biodegradable polymer in patients from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;90:6:881-887.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27030
  10. Buchanan GL, Chieffo A, Bernelli C, Montorfano M, Carlino M, Latib A, et al. Two-year outcomes following unprotected left main stenting with first vs. new-generation drugeluting stents: the FINE registry. EuroIntervention. 2013;9:7:809-816.  https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV9I7A134

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.