The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Journal: Evidence-based Cardiology. 2013;(4): 5‑9

Read: 708 times

To cite this article:

. Evidence-based Cardiology. 2013;(4):5‑9. (In Russ.)

References:

  1. Keeley E.C., Boura J.A., Grines C.L. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003;361:13-20.
  2. Widimsky P., Wijns W., Fajadet J., et al. Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries. Eur Heart J 2010;31:943-957.
  3. The Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2569-619.
  4. O'Gara P.T., Kushna F.G., Ascheim D.D., et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2013;127:529-555.
  5. Patel M.R., Dehmer G.J., Hirshfeld J.W., et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/ AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology: Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Circulation 2009;119:1330-1352.
  6. Goldstein J.A., Demetriou D., Grines C.L., et al. Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:915-922.
  7. Politi L., Sgura F., Rossi R., et al. A randomised trial of target-vessel versus multi-vessel revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: major adverse cardiac events during long-term follow-up. Heart 2010;96:662-667.
  8. Kong J.A., Chou E.T., Minutello R.M.,et al. Safety of single versus multi-vessel angioplasty for patients with acute myocardial infarction and multi-vessel coronary artery disease: report from the New York State Angioplasty Registry. Coron Artery Dis 2006;17:71-75.
  9. Khattab A.A., Abdel-Wahab M., Rother C., et al. Multi-vessel stenting during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a single-center experience. Clin Res Cardiol 2008;97:32-38.
  10. Qarawani D., Nahir M., Abboud M., et al. Culprit only versus complete coronary revascularization during primary PCI. Int J Cardiol 2008;123:288-292.
  11. Chen L.Y., Lennon R.J., Grantham J.A., et al. In-hospital and long-term outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:349-354.
  12. Varani E., Balducelli M., Aquilina M., et al. Single or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;72:927-933.
  13. Corpus R.A., House J.A., Marso S.P., et al. Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2004;148:493-500.
  14. Roe M.T., Cura F.A., Joski P.S., et al. Initial experience with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention during mechanical reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:170-173, A6.
  15. Cavender M.A., Milford-Beland S., Roe M.T., et al. Prevalence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of non-infarct artery intervention during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Am J Cardiol 2009;104:507-513.
  16. Hannan E.L., Samadashvili Z., Walford G., et al. Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:22-31.
  17. Toma M., Buller C.E., Westerhout C.M., et al. Non-culprit coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention during acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the APEX-AMI trial. Eur Heart J 2010;31:1701-1707.
  18. Di Mario C., Mara S., Flavio A., et al. Single vs multivessel treatment during primary angioplasty: results of the multicentre randomised HEpacoat for cuLPrit or multivessel stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction (HELP AMI) Study. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2004;6:128-133.
  19. Hamm C.W., Bassand J.P., Agewall S., et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European So- ciety of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011;32:2999-3054.
  20. Tonino P.A.L., De Bruyne B., Pijls N.H.J., et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213-224.
  21. De Bruyne B., Pijls N.H.J., Kalesan B., et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367:991-1001. [Erratum, N Engl J Med 2012;367:1768.]

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.