The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Kaibysheva V.O.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health

Kiriltseva M.M.

Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Smirnov A.A.

National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Fedorov E.D.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health

Shapovolyants S.G.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Chicago Classification Update (version 4.0): Main Statements Review

Authors:

Kaibysheva V.O., Kiriltseva M.M., Smirnov A.A., Fedorov E.D., Shapovolyants S.G.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2023;12(1): 66‑84

DOI: 10.17116/dokgastro20231201166

Read: 5469 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

CHICAGO CLASSIFICATION UPDATE (VERSION 4.0): MAIN STATEMENTS REVIEW
CHICAGO CLASSIFICATION UPDATE (VERSION 4.0): MAIN STATEMENTS REVIEW

To cite this article:

Kaibysheva VO, Kiriltseva MM, Smirnov AA, Fedorov ED, Shapovolyants SG. Chicago Classification Update (version 4.0): Main Statements Review. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2023;12(1):66‑84. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/dokgastro20231201166

Подписка 2026 Доказательная гастроэнтерология (Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Abstract:

OBJECTIVE

To analyze and discuss the main statements of the updated Chicago Classification version 4 of esophageal motility disorders, published in 2021 in the journal Neurogastroenterology and Motility.

MAIN STATEMENTS

The Chicago Classification version 4.0 is an updated classification for esophageal motility disorders using high-resolution manometry (HMR). Over the course of two years, seven expert groups (a total of 52 esophageal manometry specialists from different countries) worked on creating a new classification. Key updates to the Chicago Classification version 4.0 include the development of a detailed and enlarged research methodology as well as the utilization of provocative tests. Unlike the previous version, the Chicago Classification’s current version implies a mandatory description of the initial manometric parameters of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). In addition, updates and more stringent criteria have been introduced in the diagnosis of esophageal-gastric junction disorders and ineffective esophageal motility. Depending on the presence and severity of clinical symptoms and the results of provocative tests, the new version of the Chicago Classification (version 4.0) allows the issuance of a conclusion after esophageal manometry, both in the form of a final and an unconfirmed manometric diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The main provisions of the Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders, Revision 4, generally confirm the previous version of this document. The latest version underwent revisions made by the expert panel, including the expanded use of provocative tests to enable a more precise diagnosis of LES obstruction. New diagnostic criteria have been proposed to standardize the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders.

Keywords:

esophageal manometry
achalasia
ineffective esophageal motility
esophagospasm
esophageal motility disorders

Authors:

Kaibysheva V.O.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health

Kiriltseva M.M.

Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Smirnov A.A.

National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Fedorov E.D.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health

Shapovolyants S.G.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Received:

20.11.2022

Accepted:

07.01.2023

Close metadata

References:

  1. Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, Prakash Gyawali C, Roman S, Babaei A, Mittal RK, Rommel N, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Smout A, Vaezi MF, Zerbib F, Akiyama J, Bhatia S, Bor S, Carlson DA, Chen JW, Cisternas D, Cock C, Coss-Adame E, de Bortoli N, Defilippi C, Fass R, Ghoshal UC, Gonlachanvit S, Hani A, Hebbard GS, Wook Jung K, Katz P, Katzka DA, Khan A, Kohn GP, Lazarescu A, Lengliner J, Mittal SK, Omari T, Park MI, Penagini R, Pohl D, Richter JE, Serra J, Sweis R, Tack J, Tatum RP, Tutuian R, Vela MF, Wong RK, Wu JC, Xiao Y, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2021;33(1):e14058. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14058
  2. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ, Pandolfino JE; International High Resolution Manometry Working Group. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2015;27(2):160-174.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12477
  3. Shaker A, Stoikes N, Drapekin J, Kushnir V, Brunt LM, Gyawali CP. Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high- resolution manometry reflect esophageal body peristaltic reserve. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2013;108:1706-1712. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2013.289
  4. Mauro A, Savarino E, De Bortoli N, Tolone S, Pugliese D, Franchina M, Gyawali CP, Penagini R. Optimal number of multiple rapid swallows needed during high-resolution esophageal manometry for accurate prediction of contraction reserve. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2018;30(4):e13253. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13253
  5. Woodland P, Gabieta-Sonmez S, Arguero J, Ooi J, Nakagawa K, Glasinovic E, Yazaki E, Sifrim D. 200 mL Rapid Drink Challenge During High-resolution Manometry Best Predicts Objective Esophagogastric Junction Obstruction and Correlates With Symptom Severity. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2018;24:410-414.  https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm18038
  6. Ang D, Misselwitz B, Hollenstein M, Knowles K, Wright J, Tucker E, Sweis R, Fox M. Diagnostic yield of high-resolution manometry with a solid test meal for clinically relevant, symptomatic oesophageal motility disorders: serial diagnostic study. Lancet. Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2017;2:654-661.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30148-6
  7. Babaei A, Shad S, Szabo A, Massey BT. Pharmacologic interrogation of patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction using amyl nitrite. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2019;31(9):e13668. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13668
  8. Triggs JR, Carlson DA, Beveridge C, Kou W, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. Functional Luminal Imaging Probe Panometry Identifies Achalasia-Type Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2020;18:2209-2217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.037
  9. Clayton SB, Patel R, Richter JE. Functional and Anatomic Esophagogastic Junction Outflow Obstruction: Manometry, Timed Barium Esophagram Findings, and Treatment Outcomes. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2016;14:907-911.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.041
  10. Krause AJ, Su H, Triggs JR, Beveridge C, Baumann AJ, Donnan E, Pandolfino JE, Carlson DA. Multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge in patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction on high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2021;33(3):e14000. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14000
  11. Ang D, Hollenstein M, Misselwitz B, Knowles K, Wright J, Tucker E, Sweis R, Fox M. Rapid Drink Challenge in high-resolution manometry: an adjunctive test for detection of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2017;29(1):10.1111/nmo.12902. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12902
  12. Marin I, Serra J. Patterns of esophageal pressure responses to a rapid drink challenge test in patients with esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2016;28:543-553.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12749
  13. Sanagapalli S, McGuire J, Leong RW, Patel K, Raeburn A, Abdul-Razakq H, Plumb A, Banks M, Haidry R, Lovat L, Sehgal V, Graham D, Sami SS, Sweis R. The clinical relevance of manometric esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction can be determined using rapid drink challenge and solid swallows. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2021;116(2):280-288.  https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000988
  14. Hollenstein M, Thwaites P, Bütikofer S, Heinrich H, Sauter M, Ulmer I, Pohl D, Ang D, Eberli D, Schwizer W, Fried M, Distler O, Fox M, Misselwitz B. Pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility during a solid meal test: a prospective study in healthy volunteers and patients with major motility disorders. The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2017;2:644-653.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30151-6
  15. Babaei A, Shad S, Massey BT. Diagnostic differences in the pharmacologic response to cholecystokinin and amyl nitrite in patients with absent contractility vs type I Achalasia. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2020;32:e13857. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13857
  16. Babaei A, Shad S, Massey BT. Motility Patterns Following Esophageal Pharmacologic Provocation with Amyl Nitrite or Cholecystokinin During High-Resolution Manometry Distinguish Idiopathic vs Opioid-Induced Type 3 Achalasia. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2020;18(4):813-821.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.014
  • Lau JY, Sung JJ, Lam YH, Chan AC, Ng EK, Lee DW, Chan FK, Suen RC, Chung SC. Endoscopic retreatment compared with surgery in patients with recurrent bleeding after initial endoscopic control of bleeding ulcers. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340(10):751-756.  https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199903113401002
  • Laine L. Multipolar electrocoagulation in the treatment of active upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage. A prospective controlled trial. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1987;316(26):1613-1617. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198706253162601
  • Kapetanos D, Beltsis A, Chatzimavroudis G, Katsinelos P. The use of endoclips in the treatment of nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques. 2009;19(1):2-10.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0b013e31818e9297
  • Laine L, Cook D. Endoscopic ligation compared with sclerotherapy for treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding. A meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1995;123(4):280-287.  https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-123-4-199508150-00007
  • Schuman BM, Beckman JW, Tedesco FJ, Griffin JW Jr, Assad RT. Complications of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy: A review. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1987;82(9):823-830. 
  • Piai G, Cipolletta L, Claar M, Marone G, Bianco MA, Forte G, Iodice G, Mattera D, Minieri M, Rocco P. Prophylactic sclerotherapy of high-risk esophageal varices: results of a multicentric prospective controlled trial. Hepatology. 1988;8(6):1495-1500. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840080605
  • Sarin SK, Nanda R, Sachdev G, Chari S, Anand BS, Broor SL. Intravariceal versus paravariceal sclerotherapy: A prospective, controlled, randomised trial. Gut. 1987;28(6):657-662.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.28.6.657
  • Sarin SK, Sachdev G, Nanda R, Batra SK, Anand BS. Comparison of the two time schedules for endoscopic sclerotherapy: A prospective randomised controlled study. Gut. 1986;27(6):710-713.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.27.6.710
  • Westaby D, Melia WM, Macdougall BR, Hegarty JE, Williams R. Injection sclerotherapy for oesophageal varices: A prospective randomised trial of different treatment schedules. Gut. 1984;25(2): 129-132.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.25.2.129
  • Tamura S, Shiozaki H, Kobayashi K, Yano H, Tahara H, Miyata M, Mori T. Prospective randomized study on the effect of ranitidine against injection ulcer after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1991;86(4):477-480. 
  • Polson RJ, Westaby D, Gimson AE, Hayes PC, Stellon AJ, Hayllar K, Williams R. Sucralfate for the prevention of early rebleeding following injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices. Hepatology. 1989;10(3):279-282.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840100304
  • Tabibian N, Smith JL, Graham DY. Sclerotherapy-associated esophageal ulcers: lessons from a double-blind, randomized comparison of sucralfate suspension versus placebo. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1989;35(4):312-315.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72799-1
  • Krige JE, Shaw JM, Bornman PC, Kotze UK. Early rebleeding and death at 6 weeks in alcoholic cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding treated with emergency endoscopic injection sclerotherapy. South African Journal of Surgery. 2009;47(3):72-79. 
  • Yuki M, Kazumori H, Yamamoto S, Shizuku T, Kinoshita Y. Prognosis following endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices in adults: 20-year follow-up study. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008;43(10):1269-1274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365520802130217
  • Krige JE, Bornman PC, Shaw JM, Apostolou C. Complications of endoscopic variceal therapy. South African Journal of Surgery. 2005;43(4):177-194. 
  • Schmitz RJ, Sharma P, Badr AS, Qamar MT, Weston AP. Incidence and management of esophageal stricture formation, ulcer bleeding, perforation, and massive hematoma formation from sclerotherapy versus band ligation. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2001;96(2):437-441.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03460.x
  • Koch H, Henning H, Grimm H, Soehendra N. Prophylactic sclerosing of esophageal varices — results of a prospective controlled study. Endoscopy. 1986;18(2):40-43.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1018322
  • Stiegmann GV, Goff JS, Michaletz-Onody PA, Korula J, Lieberman D, Saeed ZA, Reveille RM, Sun JH, Lowenstein SR. Endoscopic sclerotherapy as compared with endoscopic ligation for bleeding esophageal varices. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1992;326(23):1527-1532. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199206043262304
  • Sørensen T, Burcharth F, Pedersen ML, Findahl F. Oesophageal stricture and dysphagia after endoscopic sclerotherapy for bleeding varices. Gut. 1984;25(5):473-477.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.25.5.473
  • The Copenhagen Esophageal Varices Sclerotherapy Project. Sclerotherapy after first variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. A randomized multicenter trial. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1984;311(25):1594-1600. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198412203112502
  • Korula J, Pandya K, Yamada S. Perforation of esophagus after endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy Incidence and clues to pathogenesis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 1989;34(3):324-329.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01536250
  • Elfant AB, Peikin SR, Alexander JB, Méndez L. Conservative management of endoscopic sclerotherapy-induced esophageal perforation. The American Surgeon. 1994;60(12):985-987. 
  • Iwase H, Suga S, Shimada M, Yamada H, Horiuchi Y, Oohashi M. Eleven-year survey of safety and efficacy of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy using 2% sodium tetradecyl sulfate and contrast medium. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 1996;22(1):58-65.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-199601000-00017
  • Laine L, el-Newihi HM, Migikovsky B, Sloane R, Garcia F. Endoscopic ligation compared with sclerotherapy for the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1993;119(1):1-7.  https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-119-1-199307010-00001
  • Deboever G, Elegeert I, Defloor E. Portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1989;84(10):1336-1337.
  • Stoltenberg PH, Goodale RL, Silvis SE. Portal vein thrombosis following combined endoscopic variceal sclerosis and vasopressin therapy for bleeding varices. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1987;82(12):1297-1300.
  • Alexander S, Korman MG, Sievert W. Cyanoacrylate in the treatment of gastric varices complicated by multiple pulmonary emboli. Internal Medicine Journal. 2006;36(7):462-465.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01086.x
  • Neumann H, Scheidbach H, Mönkemüller K, Pech M, Malfertheiner P. Multiple cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl) emboli after injection therapy of cardia varices. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2009;70(5): 1025-1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.06.013
  • Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey W. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;46(3):922-938.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21907
  • Rerknimitr R, Chanyaswad J, Kongkam P, Kullavanijaya P. Risk of bacteremia in bleeding and nonbleeding gastric varices after endoscopic injection of cyanoacrylate. Endoscopy. 2008;40(8):644-649.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1077294
  • Sauerbruch T, Holl J, Ruckdeschel G, Förstl J, Weinzierl M. Bacteriaemia associated with endoscopic sclerotherapy of oesophageal varices. Endoscopy. 1985;17(5):170-172.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1018492
  • Banerjee S, Shen B, Baron TH, Nelson DB, Anderson MA, Cash BD, Dominitz JA, Gan SI, Harrison ME, Ikenberry SO, Jagannath SB, Lichtenstein D, Fanelli RD, Lee K, van Guilder T, Stewart LE. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2008;67(6):791-798.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.068
  • Lo GH, Lai KH, Cheng JS, Hwu JH, Chang CF, Chen SM, Chiang HT. A prospective, randomized trial of sclerotherapy versus ligation in the management of bleeding esophageal varices. Hepatology. 1995;22(2):466-471. 
  • Young MF, Sanowski RA, Rasche R. Comparison and characterization of ulcerations induced by endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices versus endoscopic sclerotherapy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1993;39(2):119-122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70049-8
  • Shaheen NJ, Stuart E, Schmitz SM, Mitchell KL, Fried MW, Zacks S, Russo MW, Galanko J, Shrestha R. Pantoprazole reduces the size of postbanding ulcers after variceal band ligation: A randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology. 2005;41(3):588-594.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20593
  • Rai RR, Nijhawan S, Singh G. Post-ligation stricture: A rare complication. Endoscopy. 1996;28(4):406.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1005498
  • Mandelstam P, Sugawa C, Silvis SE, Nebel OT, Rogers BH. Complications associated with esophagogastroduodenoscopy and with esophageal dilation. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1976;23(1):16-19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(76)73568-5
  • Saeed ZA, Winchester CB, Ferro PS, Michaletz PA, Schwartz JT, Graham DY. Prospective randomized comparison of polyvinyl bougies and through‐the‐scope balloon for dilation of peptic strictures of the esophagus. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1995;41(3):189-195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70336-5
  • Scolapio JS, Pasha TM, Gostout CJ, Mahoney DW, Zinsmeister AR, Ott BJ, Lindor KD. A randomized prospective study comparing rigid to balloon dilators for benign esophageal strictures and rings. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1999;50(1):13-17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70337-8
  • Kozarek RA. Hydrostatic balloon dilation of gastrointestinal stenoses: A national survey. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1986;32(1):15-19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(86)71721-5
  • Karnak I, Tanyel FC, Buyukpamukcu N, Hicsonmez A. Esophageal perforations encountered during dilation ofcaustic esophageal strictures. The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. 1998;39(3):373-377. 
  • Kim GH, Jung KW, Jung HY, Kim MJ, Na HK, Ahn JY, Lee JH, Kim DH, Choi KD, Song HJ, Lee GH. Superior clinical outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy compared with balloon dilation in all achalasia subtypes. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2019;34(4):659-665.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14616
  • Nair LA, Reynolds JC, Parkman HP, Ouyang A, Strom BL, Rosato EF, Cohen S. Complications during pneumatic dilation for achalasia or diffuse esophageal spasm. Analysis of risk factors, early clinical characteristics, and outcome. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 1993;38(10):1893-1904. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01296115
  • Ng TM, Spencer GM, Sargeant IR, Thorpe SM, Brown SG. Management of strictures after radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Gastrointestestinal Endoscopy. 1996;43(6):584-590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70196-7
  • Botoman VA, Surawicz CM. Bacteremia with gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1986;32(5):342-346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(86)71880-4
  • Disario JA, Fennerty MB, Tietze CC, Hutson WR, Burt RW. Endoscopic balloon dilation for ulcer‐induced gastric outlet obstruction. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1994;89(6):868-871. 
  • Lau JY, Chung SC, Sung JJ, Chan AC, Ng EK, Suen RC, Li AK. Through‐the‐scope balloon dilation for pyloric stenosis: long‐term results. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1996;43:98-101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(06)80107-0
  • Spaander MCW, van der Bogt RD, Baron TH, Albers D, Blero D, de Ceglie A, Conio M, Czakó L, Everett S, Garcia-Pagán JC, Ginès A, Jovani M, Repici A, Rodrigues-Pinto E, Siersema PD, Fuccio L, van Hooft JE. Esophageal stenting for benign and malignant disease: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline — Update 2021. Endoscopy. 2021;53(7): 751-762.  https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1475-0063
  • Shenfine J, McNamee P, Steen N, Bond J, Griffin SM. A randomized controlled clinical trial of palliative therapies for patients with inoperable esophageal cancer. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2009;104(7):1674-1685. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.155
  • Jacobson BC, Hirota W, Baron TH, Leighton JA, Faigel DO. The role of endoscopy in the assessment and treatment of esophageal cancer. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2003;57(7):817-822.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(03)70048-0
  • Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ. Metallic self-expanding stent application in the upper gastrointestinal tract: caveats and concerns. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1992;38(1):1-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70321-6
  • Tierney W, Chuttani R, Croffie J, DiSario J, Liu J, Mishkin DS, Shah R, Somogyi L, Petersen BT. Enteral stents. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2006;63(7):920-926.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.01.015
  • Baron TH. A practical guide for choosing an expandable metal stent for GI malignancies: is a stent by any other name still a stent? Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2001;54(2):269-272.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2001.116626
  • Baron TH. Minimizing endoscopic complications: endoluminal stents. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America. 2007; 17(1):83-104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2007.01.004
  • Baron TH. Expandable metal stents for the treatment of cancerous obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2001;344(22):1681-1687. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200105313442206
  • Siersema PD, Hop WC, van Blankenstein M, Dees J. A new design metal stent (Flamingo stent) for palliation of malignant dysphagia: a prospective study. The Rotterdam Esophageal Tumor Study Group. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2000;51(2):139-145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70408-1
  • Vleggaar FP, Siersema PD. Expandable stents for malignant esophageal disease. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America. 2011;21(3):377-388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2011.04.006
  • Dua KS, Kozarek R, Kim J, Evans J, Medda BK, Lang I, Hogan WJ, Shaker R. Self-expanding metal esophageal stent with anti-reflux mechanism. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2001;53(6):603-613.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2001.114054
  • Homs MY, Wahab PJ, Kuipers EJ, Steyerberg EW, Grool TA, Haringsma J, Siersema PD. Esophageal stentswith antireflux valve for tumors of the distal esophagus and gastric cardia: A randomized trial. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2004;60(5):695-702.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02047-4
  • Schembre DB. Recent advances in the use of stents for esophageal disease. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America. 2010;20(1):103-121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2009.08.004
  • Homs MY, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ, van der Gaast A, Haringsma J, van Blankenstein M, Siersema PD. Causes and treatment of recurrent dysphagia after self-expanding metal stent placement for palliation of esophageal carcinoma. Endoscopy. 2004;36(10): 880-886.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-825855
  • Wang MQ, Sze DY, Wang ZP, Wang ZQ, Gao YA, Dake MD. Delayed complications after esophageal stent placement for treatment of malignant esophageal obstructions and esophagorespiratory fistulas. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2001;12(4):465-474.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61886-7
  • Kinsman KJ, DeGregorio BT, Katon RM, Morrison K, Saxon RR, Keller FS, Rosch J. Prior radiation and chemotherapy increase the risk of life-threatening complications after insertion of metallic stents for esophagogastric malignancy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1996;43(3):196-203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70315-2
  • Gaidos JK, Draganov PV. Treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction with endoscopically placed self-expandable metal stents. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2009;15(35):4365-4371. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.4365
  • Maetani I, Ukita T, Tada T, Shigoka H, Omuta S, Endo T. Metallic stents for gastric outlet obstruction: reintervention rate is lower with uncovered versus covered stents, despite similar outcomes. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2009;69(4):806-812.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.009
  • Jeurnink SM, Steyerberg EW, van Hooft JE, van Eijck CH, Schwartz MP, Vleggaar FP, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD. Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): A multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2010;71(3): 490-499.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.042
  • Ly J, O’Grady G, Mittal A, Plank L, Windsor JA. A systematic review of methods to palliate malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surgical Endoscopy. 2010;24(2):290-297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0577-1
  • Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010;42(4):265-271.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1244080
  • Zhang XC, Li QL, Xu MD, Chen SY, Zhong YS, Zhang YQ, Chen WF, Ma LL, Qin WZ, Hu JW, Cai MY, Yao LQ, Zhou PH. Major perioperative adverse events of peroral endoscopic myotomy: A systematic 5-year analysis. Endoscopy. 2016;48(11):967-978.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-110397
  • Wang X, Tan Y, Lv L, Zhu H, Chu Y, Li C, Liu D. Peroral endoscopic myotomy versus pneumatic dilation for achalasia in patients aged ≥ 65 years. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas. 2016;108(10):637-641.  https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2016.4488/2016
  • Tan Y, Zhu H, Li C, Chu Y, Huo J, Liu D. Comparison of peroral endoscopic myotomy and endoscopic balloon dilation for primary treatment of pediatric achalasia. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2016;51(10):1613-1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.008
  • Meng F, Li P, Wang Y, Ji M, Wu Y, Yu L, Niu Y, Lv F, Li W, Li W, Zhai H, Wu S, Zhang S. Peroral endoscopic myotomy compared with pneumatic dilation for newly diagnosed achalasia. Surgical Endoscopy. 2017;31(11):4665-4672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5530-0
  • Zhong C, Tan S, Huang S, Lü M, Peng Y, Fu X, Tang X. Peroral endoscopic myotomy versus pneumatic dilation for achalasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2020;32(11):1413-1421. https://doi.org/10.1097/meg.0000000000001800
  • Ponds FA, Fockens P, Lei A, Neuhaus H, Beyna T, Kandler J, Frieling T, Chiu PWY, Wu JCY, Wong VWY, Costamagna G, Familiari P, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Smout AJPM, Bredenoord AJ. Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs pneumatic dilation on symptom severity and treatment outcomes among treatment-naive patients with achalasia: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019; 322(2):134-144.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.8859
  • Zheng Z, Zhao C, Su S, Fan X, Zhao W, Wang B, Jin H, Zhang L, Wang T, Wang B. Peroral endoscopic myotomy versus pneumatic dilation — result from a retrospective study with 1-year follow-up. Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie. 2019;57(3):304-311.  https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0821-7232
  • Kanischev I, Nedoluzhko I, Shishin, K, Kurushkina N, Shumkina L. Poem as a Treatment Option for Achalasia in Patients 65 Years of Age and Older. Endoscopy. 2021;53(S 01):109.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1724537
  • Weusten BLAM, Barret M, Bredenoord AJ, Familiari P, Gonzalez JM, van Hooft JE, Ishaq S, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Louis H, van Meer S, Neumann H, Pohl D, Prat F, von Renteln D, Savarino E, Sweis R, Tack J, Tutuian R, Martinek J. Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal motility disorders — part 1: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020;52(6):498-515.  https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1160-5549
  • Bayer J, Vackova Z, Svecova H, Stirand P, Spicak J, Martinek J. Gentamicin submucosal lavage during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): A retrospective analysis. Surgical Endoscopy. 2018; 32(1):300-306.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5677-8
  • Costamagna G, Iacopini F, Bizzotto A, Familiari P, Tringali A, Perri V, Bella A. Prognostic variables for the clinical success of flexible endoscopic septotomy of Zenker’s diverticulum. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2016;83(4):765-773.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.044
  • Shahawy S, Janisiewicz AM, Annino D, Shapiro J. A comparative study of outcomes for endoscopic diverticulotomy versus external diverticulectomy. Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery. 2014;151(4):646-651.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814541920
  • Verdonck J, Morton RP. Systematic review on treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology. 2015;272(11):3095-3107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3267-0
  • Albers DV, Kondo A, Bernardo WM, Sakai P, Moura RN, Silva GL, Ide E, Tomishige T, de Moura EG. Endoscopic versus surgical approach in the treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy International Open. 2016;4(6):678-686.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-106203
  • Ishaq S, Hassan C, Antonello A, Tanner K, Bellisario C, Battaglia G, Anderloni A, Correale L, Sharma P, Baron TH, Repici A. Flexible endoscopic treatment for Zenker’s diverticulum: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2016;83(6):1076-1089.e5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.039
  • Yang J, Novak S, Ujiki M, Hernández Ó, Desai P, Benias P, Lee  D, Chang K, Brieau B, Barret M, Kumta N, Zeng X, Hu B, Delis K, Khashab MA. An international study on the use of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the management of Zenker’s diverticulum. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2020;91(1):163-168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.249
  • Pavlov I, Shishin K, Nedoluzhko I, Kurushkina N, Shumkina L. Results of the Endoscopic Treatment of Patients With Zenker’s Diverticulum. Endoscopy. 2021;53(1):S107-S108. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1724533
  • Weusten BLAM, Barret M, Bredenoord AJ, Familiari P, Gonzalez JM, van Hooft JE, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Louis H, Martinek J, van Meer S, Neumann H, Pohl D, Prat F, von Renteln D, Savarino E, Sweis R, Tack J, Tutuian R, Ishaq S. Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal motility disorders — part 2: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020;52(7):600-614.  https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1171-3174
    • Contact the author
    Email
    Message
    The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

    Email Confirmation

    An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

    Email Confirmation

    Contact us
    If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
    Email
    Message
    The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
    Submit Application

    You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

    Name
    Phone
    E-mail
    Message
    Login
    Registration
    E-mail
    Password
    Forgot Password?

    Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

    Password recovery
    E-mail
    Login
    Register

    We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.