The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Ermolaev A.Yu.

Volga Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Kravets L.Ya.

Volga District Federal Medical Research Centre, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russian Federation

Smetanina S.V.

Infectious Clinical Hospital №1 of the Moscow Department of Health, Moscow, Russia

Kolpakova A.A.

Volga Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Yashin K.S.

Nizhny Novgorod Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of Public Health Ministry of Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Morev A.V.

Volga Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Smetatina O.V.

Volga Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Klyuev E.A.

Volga Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Medyanik I.A.

Nizhny Novgorod Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of Public Health Ministry of Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Cytologic control of the resection margins of hemispheric gliomas and metastases

Authors:

Ermolaev A.Yu., Kravets L.Ya., Smetanina S.V., Kolpakova A.A., Yashin K.S., Morev A.V., Smetatina O.V., Klyuev E.A., Medyanik I.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2020;84(1): 33‑42

Views: 2088

Downloaded: 52


To cite this article:

Ermolaev AYu, Kravets LYa, Smetanina SV, et al. . Cytologic control of the resection margins of hemispheric gliomas and metastases. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2020;84(1):33‑42. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20208401133

Gross-total resection for brain tumors is currently recognized as a favorable prognostic factor for survival in patients with diffuse gliomas Grade II—IV [1]. At the same time, it is known that tumor cells spread beyond the boundaries of microsurgical visibility, contrast-enhanced area and/or zone of abnormal T2-signal in patients with diffuse gliomas [2—6]. Feasibility of more extensive “supratotal” resection is discussed for improvement of survival in patients with gliomas Grade II [7, 8]. Extensive resection of gliomas Grade III—IV is also discussed [9—11]. Similar questions are posed regarding resection of brain metastases. Depth of invasion in various morphological types of tumors remains unclear despite the apparent nodal growth of these neoplasms [12]. Resection of metastases with perifocal zone within 5 mm beyond the tumor has already become a standard [13]. However, even this approach is associated with recurrences [14]. Further studies of the effectiveness of the so-called “supramarginal” metastatic resection are required [12].

Modern methods for determining resection margins including metabolic navigation [15, 16] and intraoperative MRI [17, 18] can increase quality of resection. However, none of modern methods of intraoperative diagnosis guarantees total resection and absolute cytoreduction. Moreover, resection of tumor within its anatomical boundaries is associated with certain limitations if the neoplasm is adjacent to functionally significant zone. Indeed, patient’s functional status is not only a reliable predictor of survival, but also an essential factor of quality of life. The term “onco-functional balance” in modern neurosurgery of gliomas denotes this problem. Currently, this balance is achieved by intraoperative comparison of anatomical and “functional” boundaries of the tumor.

Some authors additionally analyze tumor boundaries regarding residual tumor tissue despite all advantages of modern imaging technologies [19]. In our study, we applied multifocal cytological examination of resection. Diagnostic value of this method for assessing CNS tumor spread has been demonstrated in various reports devoted to cytological [20, 21] and genetic [22, 23] verification of tumor tissue in patients with glial tumors [20—22] and cerebral metastases [20, 22, 23 ]. Sensitivity and specificity of cytological intraoperative examination are similar to the same values in case of histological examination using a cryostat [24].

Purpose — to analyze the possibilities of cytological study of resection margins of glial and metastatic tumors for objective assessment of resection quality.

Material and methods

The study included 35 patients (20 men and 15 women) with supratentorial brain tumors who underwent open surgery. There were 15 patients with brain metastases (melanoma — 5, carcinoma — 10), 13 patients with diffuse gliomas accumulating contrast agent (glioblastoma — 12 patients, glioma Grade III — 1 patient), 7 patients with diffuse gliomas and no contrast enhancement (Grade II — 5 patients, Grade III – 2 patients). Exclusion criteria: age <18 years, severe somatic diseases, suspected lymphoproliferative intracerebral process. All patients signed an informed consent. The ethics committee approved study protocol.

Primary surgery without previous adjuvant treatment was applied in all patients with non-contrast-enhancing diffuse gliomas. Redo surgery with radiotherapy between recurrences was performed in 4 out of 13 patients with contrast-enhancing gliomas Grade III—IV and 4 out of 15 patients with metastases. These patients were of particular interest regarding the effect of radiotherapy on perifocal presence of tumor cells.

All patients underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI (Magnevist 0.2 ml/kg) and DTI-tractography of the white matter pathways (1.5 T Siemens Essenza MRI scanner). The data were compiled using the NordicBrainEx software. According to DTI-tractography data, corticospinal tract was involved in 24 out of 35 cases (68.6%), arcuate tract — in 11 out of 21 (52.4%) patients with tumor of dominant hemisphere. Neurophysiological monitoring was carried using cortical bipolar and subcortical monopolar stimulation (32-channel INOMED ISIS IOM scanner). Motor mapping was performed in 17 cases, speech cortical mapping — in 5 out of 35 cases.

The models of motor and associative (arcuate, oblique frontal) tracts were loaded into Medtronic S7 neuronavigation station. Standard surgical approaches and microsurgical resection of glial and metastatic brain tumors were used.

Histological and immunohistochemical examination of intraoperative specimens was used to confirm the final diagnosis. Resection of tumor was additionally associated with multifocal (2—5 sites) sampling of tissues for cytological examination (volume ͌ 0.003 cm3). Specimens were sampled in the nearest to tumor perifocal zone and the most distant points at the border of extended resection. Time of cytological examination is about 15 min.

Definition of the boundaries of the so-called "supratotal" resection is quite subjective. In this study, extended resection included aspiration zone within at least 5 mm from the visible tumor edge. Samples were harvested from this area. Another sampling point was at the tumor edge identified visually through a microscope in combination with neuronavigation data. Specimens were labeled, centrifuged, placed on a glass slide, fixed and stained with MGG express dye (Bio-Optica, Italy). Stained specimens were examined (Nikon ECLIPSE NI-U light microscope) under 100-, 200- and 1000-fold oil immersion magnification. Cellularity, presence of tumor cells and other elements were analyzed under low magnification (x100, 200). Structural features of the nucleus, nuclear membrane and cytoplasm were evaluated under 1000-fold magnification. A total of 154 samples were examined. The data were recorded in the individual patient’s registration card.

Control contrast-enhanced MRI in early postoperative period was performed in 29 patients. Analysis of resection quality is shown in Table 1.

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistica 6.1 software program. Diagnostic significance of cytological examination was compared with postoperative MRI using logistic regression analysis. Within-group analysis was carried out using Pearson test (c2). Differences were significant at p-value<0.05.

Results

We present data on perifocal tumor cells distribution in study groups.

Cerebral metastases

There were 64 samples in patients who underwent resection of metastases (2—5 per a patient). The following data were observed (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Incidence of tumor cells detection in different areas during resection of brain metastases. Number of samples with tumor cells — red, samples without tumor — green.
Tumor cells in the nearest perifocal zone were found in 8 out of 28 samples (28.6%), at the border of extended resection — in 3 out of 29 (10.3%) samples. Differences were not significant (χ2= 3, p=0.102). Tumor cells were verified in 6 out of 7 control samples (central part of the tumor) (85.6%; χ2=20.8, p=0.001).

Tumor cells in the perifocal zone was the most common finding in patients with carcinoma (5 out of 10) and melanoma (2 out of 5 samples). Tumor cells at the border of extended resection were less common (only 3 samples in 2 patients) while total resection was confirmed by MRI in 92% and 100% of cases.

Case report

A 70-year-old patient N. had a metastasis of melanoma in the right parietal lobe (Fig. 2a—c).

Fig. 2. Patient with metastatic melanoma of the right parietal lobe. a, b, c – sampling points according to DTI navigation data; d, e – images of cytological samples under 100-fold magnification, MGG express dye; f, g, h — postoperative MRI, contrast-enhancing zone is designated by red color.
Surgery was accompanied by harvesting of 5 samples for cytological examination. Tumor cells were found in all samples including specimens harvested at the border of extended resection. Tumor cells were located inside the vessels in these samples (Fig. 2d, e). MRI-based surgical radicalness was 0.92. There was a cloak-like contrast-enhanced area along the lateral wall of the tumor bed (Fig. 2f—g) despite total microsurgical resection of tumor. Interestingly, sampling points were on anterior and medial walls that did not correspond to contrast enhancement zone (Fig. 2 a—c).

This case demonstrates one of the potential causes of recurrent tumors due to endovascular dissemination of tumor cells.

Contrast-enhancing gliomas Grade III—IV

There were 60 samples of contrast-enhancing gliomas Grade III—IV. Tumor cells in the nearest perifocal zone were found in 22 out of 32 samples (68.8%), at the border of extended resection — in 14 out of 20 (70%) samples (χ2=0.009, p=1). Tumor cells were verified in 7 out of 8 (87.5%) control samples (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Incidence of tumor cells detection in tumor and perifocal zone during resection of contrast-enhancing gliomas Grade III—IV. Number of samples with tumor cells — red, samples without tumor — green.

Tumor cells in the nearest perifocal zone were found in 12 out of 13 patients, at the final border of resection — in 11 out of 13 patients. MRI-based surgical radicalness was over 99% in both cases with cytologically negative margins. Tumor cells in the nearest perifocal zone and at the border of extended resection were detected in 11 patients. That, extended surgery did not improve quality of resection considering cytological data.

Non-contrast-enhancing diffuse gliomas Grade II—III

There were 33 samples in 7 surgeries for non-contrast-enhancing gliomas Grade II—III (4—5 per a patient).

Tumor cells in perifocal zone were detected in 10 out of 17 samples (58.9%), in supramarginal zone — in 4 out of 11 (36.4%) samples (χ2=0.009, p=1). Tumor was verified in 3 out of 5 (60%) control samples (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. Incidence of tumor cells detection in tumor and perifocal zone during resection of contrast-enhancing gliomas Grade II—III. Number of samples with tumor cells — red, samples without tumor — green.

Functionally justified limitation of resection is shown in the following observation.

A 51-year-old patient Kh. had left-sided oligoastrocytoma (Grade II, NOS) with primary localization in the middle frontal gyrus (Fig. 5g).

Fig. 5. Patient with diffuse glioma Grade II of the left frontal lobe. a, b, c, d — sampling points according to DTI navigation data; e, f — images of cytological samples under 100-fold magnification, MGG express dye;| g, h — postoperative MRI, zone of abnormal T2 signal is designated by red color.
According to cytological data, tumor cells at the border of final resection were found in 1 sample (Fig. 5a—d). This site corresponded to the area of abnormal T2 signal along posteromedial border of resection in postoperative MRI scans (Fig. 5h). Subcortical stimulation of posterior wall of the tumor bed resulted speech disorders. Therefore, extended resection in this area was not performed. MRI-based radicalness was 87.3%.

In general, higher quality of resection confirmed by MRI data was associated with less incidence of detection of tumor cells at the border of final resection in at least one of the samples (“cytological” radicalness) (B0=19.2; B1=-20.8; c2=13.6; n=29, p=0.001; P(+)=50% with a radicalness of 92.6%) (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6. Regression logistic model of tumor cells detection at the final border of resection depending on MRI-based surgical radicalness. Detection of tumor cells at the final border of tumor cells — binomial variable, where 1 — tumor cells were detected in at least one sample, 0 — tumor cells were not found in any sample.

Similar models were created in each of the selected groups: cerebral metastases (B0=3951; B1=-4318; c2=7; n=12; p=0.008), non-contrast-enhancing gliomas (B0=263.8; B1=-330.5; c2=8.3; n=6, p=0.004) and contrast-enhancing gliomas (B0=61 B1=-61; c2=3.6; n=11, p=0.056).

Detection of tumor cells was associated with a large volume of contrast-enhancing tumor in accordance with preoperative MRI in the groups of cerebral metastases and contrast-enhancing gliomas (B0=-1.1; B1=-0.04; c2=6.35; n=28, p=0.012) (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7. Regression logistic model of tumor cells detection at the final border of resection depending on volume of contrast-enhancing tumor. Detection of tumor cells at the final border of tumor cells — binomial variable, where 1 — tumor cells were detected in at least one sample, 0 — tumor cells were not found in any sample.

Redo surgery and previous radiotherapy were not associated with “cytological” radicalness (c2=0.5, p=0.704).

Discussion

Primary data showed that cytological examination of perifocal zone was quite informative as an additional tool for assessing quality of resection of gliomas and metastases. Moreover, this technique was even more sensitive than postoperative MRI in some cases.

Extended resection of gliomas Grade III—IV has no advantages regarding “cytological” radicalness, because tumor cells were found in the nearest perifocal zone and at the border of extended resection with approximately the same incidence (68.8% and 70%, respectively).

At the same time, “supramarginal” resection of cerebral metastases was associated with less incidence of detection of tumor cells at the border of extended resection compared with the nearest perifocal zone (10.3% vs. 28.6%). Therefore, this method may be justified. Undoubtedly, further trials are required because insignificant differences (p=0.102) may be due to small sample size.

Conclusion

The most significant findings of multifocal cytological examination of resection margins were the data on the incidence of tumor cells detection within various distances from the tumor node. These results ensure certain pros and cons in discussion about the need for extended resection of neoplasms. Intraoperative on-line cytological examination to clarify surgical strategy seems perspective. Significance of this information for prediction of recurrences, clarifying the boundaries of target for radiotherapy and chemotherapy strategy remains debatable

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.