The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Bakhshinian V.V.

Rossiĭskiĭ nauchno-prakticheskiĭ tsentr audiologii i slukhoprotezirovaniia FMBA Rossii, Moskva, Rossiia 117513;
Kafedra surdologii RMAPO Minzdrava Rossii, Moskva, Rossiia 123395

Sataeva A.I.

Institute of Corrective Pedagogics, Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia 119121

The effectiveness of the speech therapist and audiologist collaboration during speech processor fitting

Authors:

Bakhshinian V.V., Sataeva A.I.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2018;83(4): 67‑72

DOI: 10.17116/otorino201883467

Read: 1213 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SPEECH THERAPIST AND AUDIOLOGIST COLLABORATION DURING SPEECH PROCESSOR FITTING
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SPEECH THERAPIST AND AUDIOLOGIST COLLABORATION DURING SPEECH PROCESSOR FITTING

To cite this article:

Bakhshinian VV, Sataeva AI. The effectiveness of the speech therapist and audiologist collaboration during speech processor fitting. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2018;83(4):67‑72. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201883467

Подписка 2026 Вестник оториноларингологии (Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Audiological aspe­cts of reha­bilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear malformations. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2024;(6):4-9
Candidacy and reha­bilitation of adolescents during sequential bila­teral cochlear implantation with a long-term inte­rval between surgeries. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2025;(4):11-18
Abstract:

The aim of the study was to present the first clinical experience of clinical trials of new methodology of the CI speech processor fitting with the new software Nucleus Fitting Software — NFS. At all 4 fittings sessions there were 15 children. During the fitting sessions 2 techniques were used — with the new NFS software and classical technique were used. The efficiency and need of collaboration of the speech therapist and the audiologist in the CI fitting sessions is proved. Results of inspection have shown that in 76.6% parents have established emotional cooperation with the children. Most of children have begun to seize the spontaneous speech in natural communication (60% — words, 23.3% — simple phrases). The results received by us allow to recommend the offered technique of the facilitated speech processor fitting technique for widespread introduction in clinical practice.

Keywords:

cochlear implantation
Nucleus Fitting Software
speech processor fitting
medical-psychological-pedagogical rehabilitation after CI
3P rehabilitation

Authors:

Bakhshinian V.V.

Rossiĭskiĭ nauchno-prakticheskiĭ tsentr audiologii i slukhoprotezirovaniia FMBA Rossii, Moskva, Rossiia 117513;
Kafedra surdologii RMAPO Minzdrava Rossii, Moskva, Rossiia 123395

Sataeva A.I.

Institute of Corrective Pedagogics, Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia 119121

Close metadata

References:

  1. Clark G. Cochlear Implants: Fundamentals and Applications. Graeme Clark AIP Press/Springer-Verlag, New York. 2003. 2013;654-706. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1839383
  2. Dowell RC, Dawson PW, Dettman SJ, Shepherd RK, Whitford LA, Seligman PM, Clark GM. Multichannel cochlear implantation in children. A summary of current work at the University of Melbourne. American Journal of Otology. 1991;12(suppl):137-143.
  3. Edwards L. Children with cochlear implants and complex needs: a review of outcome research and psychological practice. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2007;12(3):258-268. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enm007
  4. Eisen MD. History of the cochlear implant. In: Waltzman SB, Roland JT Jr, eds. Cochlear implants. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0034-56243.
  5. Tavartkiladze GA. The history of cochlear implantation. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2016;81(6):4-8. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20168164-8.
  6. Bakhshinyan VV. The current tendencies and prospects of the neural response telemetry in the rehabilitation of the patients after cochlear implantation. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2014;2:21-25. (In Russ.)
  7. Mileshina NA, Osipenkov SS, Bakhshinyan VV, Tavartkiladze GA. The impact of implantable technologies on the quality of life in the patients with hearing loss. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2016;81(6):22-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201681622-24
  8. Goikhburg MV, Bakhshinyan VV, Tavartkiladze GA. The effectiveness of rehabilitation following bilateral cochlear implantation. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2014;2:26-28. (In Russ.)
  9. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskaya pomoshch’ posle kokhlearnoi implantatsii. Realizatsiya novykh vozmozhnostei rebenka. Monografiya. Pod red. Kukushkinoi O.I., Goncharovoi E.L., Nikol’skoi O.S. M.: Poligraf servis; 2014. (In Russ.)
  10. Goncharova EL, Kukushkina OI. Alterations in the status of a child with a cochlear implant in the course of rehabilitation. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2015;80(3):23-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201580323-24.
  11. Kukushkina OI, Goncharova EL. Rehabilitation of a child with CI: «Initial point» of new auditory abilities. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2016;81(6):58-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201681658-61
  12. Sataeva AI. Pedagogical rehabilitation of deaf pre-school children following cochlear implantation. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2015;80(1):28-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201580128-31
  13. Sataeva AI, Bakhshinyan VV. Etap podklyucheniya rechevogo protsessora, ego pervichnaya nastroika: audiolog i surdopedagog. Al’manakh Instituta korrektsionnoi pedagogiki. 2015;21. (In Russ.) http://alldef.ru/ru/articles/almanah-21/etap-podklyucheniya-rechevogo-proczessora,-ego-pervichnaya-nastrojka-audiolog-i-surdopedagog
  14. Sataeva AI. Four sessions of the teacher of the deaf work at the initial stage of a child with CI rehabilitation. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2016;81(6):54-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201681654-57
  15. Deti s kokhlearnymi implantami. Nauchno-populyarnoe izdanie. Pod red. Kukushkinoi O.I, Goncharovoi E.L. M.: Natsional’noe obrazovanie; 2017. (In Russ.)
  16. Tavartkiladze GA. Rukovodstvo po klinicheskoi audiologii. M.: Meditsina; 2013. (in Russ.)
  17. Sataeva AI. Sistema raboty surdopedagoga s det’mi posle kokhlearnoi implantatsii: Dis... kand.p.nauk. M. 2016. (In Russ.)
  18. Baenskaya ER. Zakonomernosti rannego emotsional’nogo razvitiya v norme. Al’manakh Instituta korrektsionnoi pedagogiki. 2015;19. (In Russ.) http://alldef.ru/ru/articles/almanah-19/zakonomernosti-rannego-emocionalnogo-razvitija-v
  19. Nikol’skaja OS. Affektivnaja sfera kak sistema smyslov, organizujushhih soznanie i povedenie. M.: MGPPU; 2008. (In Russ.)
  20. Kukushkina OI, Goncharova EL. Podkhod k reabilitatsii rebenka posle kokhlearnoi implantatsii. Defektologiya. 2016;4:44-52. (In Russ.)
  21. Bakhshinyan VV, Fedoseev VI, Tavartkiladze GA. The new technologies for the intraoperative registration of the electrically evoked compound action potentials of the acoustical nerve by means of the neural response telemetry method. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2015;80(3):14-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201580314-17
  22. Tavartkiladze GA, Bakhshinyan VV. Novye podkhody k reabilitatsii patsientov na razlichnykh etapakh kokhlearnoi implantatsii. Materialy 6-go Natsional’nogo kongressa audiologov i 10-go Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma «Sovremennye problemy fiziologii i patologii slukha». Suzdal’, 19—21 maya 2015 goda. M. 2015;87-88. (In Russ.)
  23. Botros A, Psarros C. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: I. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting. Ear and Hearing. 2010;31:367-379. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0b013e3181c9fd86
  24. Botros A, van Dijk B, Killian M. AutoNRT™: An automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom ™ cochlear implant via machine intelligence. Artificial intelligence in medicine. 2007;40:15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2006.06.003
  25. Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, Abbas PJ, Wolaver A, Gervais J. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear and Hearing. 2000;21:151-163. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200004000-00009
  26. Cafarelli Dees D, Dillier N, Lai WK, Von Wallenberg E, van Dijk B, Akdas F, Aksit M, Batman C, Beynon A, Burdo S, Chanal JM, Collet L, Conway M, Coudert C, Craddock L, Cullington H, Deggouj N, Fraysse B, Grabel S, Kiefer J, Kiss JG, Lenarz T, Mair A, Maune S, Müller-Deile J, Piron JP, Razza S, Tasche C, Thai-Van H, Toth F, Truy E, Uziel A, Smoorenburg GF. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiology and Neurootology. 2005;10:105-116. https://doi.org/10.1159/000083366
  27. Hughes ML, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Wolaver AA, Gervais JP. Comparison of EAP thresholds to MAP levels in the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant: data from children. Ear and Hearing. 2000;21:164-174. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200004000-00010
  28. Smoorenburg GF. T- and C-level profiles across the electrode array: fitting the speech processor by profile parameter adjustment. In: Cochlear Implant Ear Marks. University Medical Center, Utrecht. 2007:35—54. Accessed December 28, 2017. http://www.audiologics.com
  29. Smoorenburg GF, Willeboer C, van Dijk J. Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiology and Neurootology. 2002;7:335-347. https://doi.org/10.1159/000066154
  30. van Dijk B, Botros AM, Battmer R-D, Begall K, Dillier N, Hey M, Lai WK, Lenarz T, Laszig R, Morsnowski A, Müller-Deile J, Psarros C, Shallop J, Weber B, Wesarg T, Zarowski A, Offeciers E. Clinical results of AutoNRT, a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing. 2007;28:558-570. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0b013e31806dc1d1
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.