Algorithm for treatment of patients with class II malocclusion rejecting orthognathic surgery

Popova N.V.; Arsenina O.I.; Glukhova N.V.; Popova A.V.; Gavrilova M.V.; Khvorostenko E.A.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202110002164

Popova N.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery»;
Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency

ORCID: 0000-0002-3686-5263

Arsenina O.I.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery»;
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

ORCID: 0000-0002-0738-1227

Glukhova N.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Popova A.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery»

ORCID: 0000-0003-3713-606X

Gavrilova M.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Khvorostenko E.A.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

ORCID: 0000-0002-6907-5305

Algorithm for treatment of patients with class II malocclusion rejecting orthognathic surgery

Authors:

Popova N.V., Arsenina O.I., Glukhova N.V., Popova A.V., Gavrilova M.V., Khvorostenko E.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2021;100(2): 64‑72

DOI: 10.17116/stomat202110002164

Read: 7045 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Popova NV, Arsenina OI, Glukhova NV, Popova AV, Gavrilova MV, Khvorostenko EA. Algorithm for treatment of patients with class II malocclusion rejecting orthognathic surgery. Stomatology. 2021;100(2):64‑72. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202110002164

Подписка 2026 Стоматология (Stomatology)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Abstract:

The aim of this study is to develop algorithms for the treatment of patients with class II malocclusion and incisor protrusion using the combination of bracket system, functional fixed telescopic appliance (FFTA) and skeletal anchorage, which allows to achieve effective dentoalveolar compensation of skeletal forms of class II malocclusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Orthodontic treatment of 60 patients with class II malocclusion at the age of 18 to 44 years, using the bracket system, FFTA and orthodontic miniscrews was performed. In order to assess the results of treatment, cone-beam computed tomography were obtained at the beginning and at the end of treatment.

RESULTS

As a result of the treatment normalization of lower jaw position, dental position and occlusion were achieved, the lower incisors protrusion was eliminated and the facial profile was improved, reliably confirmed by lateral cephalograms.

CONCLUSION

The proposed treatment algorithm proved to be effective for stable correction of skeletal class II malocclusion in patients rejecting orthognathic surgery.

Keywords:

class II malocclusion

incisor protrusion

functional orthodontic appliance

orthodontic miniscrews

Authors:

Popova N.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery»;
Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency

ORCID: 0000-0002-3686-5263

Arsenina O.I.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery»;
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

ORCID: 0000-0002-0738-1227

Glukhova N.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Popova A.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery»

ORCID: 0000-0003-3713-606X

Gavrilova M.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Khvorostenko E.A.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

ORCID: 0000-0002-6907-5305

Received:

11.10.2020

Accepted:

21.12.2020

Close metadata

References:

Arsenina OI. Ortodonticheskoe lechenie patsientov s nizhnei retrognatiei i disfunktsiei visochno-nizhnechelyustnogo sustava. M. 2019. (In. Russ.).
Ravinda Nanda. Biomekhanika i estetika v klinicheskoi ortodontii. M.: MEDpress-inform; 2009. (In. Russ.).
Proffit U.R. Sovremennaya ortodontiya. Per. s angl. Pod red. chlena-korrespondenta RAMN, prof. Persina L.S. M.: MEDpress-inform; 2006. (In. Russ.).
Stefan Vil’yams. Kontseptual’naya ortodontiya. II. Rost i ortopediya. L’vov: GalDent; 2006. (In. Russ.).
Weschler D, Pancherz H. Efficiency of three mandibular anchorage forms in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:23-27. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0023:EOTMAF>2.0.CO;2 "> 2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0023:EOTMAF>2.0.CO;2
Pancherz H, Hansen K. Mandibular anchorage in Herbst treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1988;10:149-164. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/10.2.149
Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:429-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70264-7
Flores-Mir C, Ayeh A, Goswani A, Charkhandeh S. Skeletal and dental changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with splint-type Herbst appliances. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:376-381. https://doi.org/10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0376:SADCIC]2.0.CO;2
Fleisher GM. Rentgenologicheskie issledovaniya v ortodontii. Tsefalometriya. Rukovodstvo dlya vrachei. Izdatel’skie resheniya. 2018;68-69. (In. Russ.).