Comparison of clinical and radiological features of keratinized gingiva and buccal cortical bone in patient with gingival recession

Sizikov A.V.; Grachev V.I.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20199802122

Sizikov A.V.

Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery, Moscow, Russia

Grachev V.I.

Kafedra rekonstruktivnoĭ khirurgicheskoĭ stomatologii i implantologii fakul'teta poslediplomnogo obrazovaniia GBOU VPO "Moskovskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ mediko-stomatologicheskiĭ universitet im. A.I. Evdokimova" Minzdrava Rossii

Comparison of clinical and radiological features of keratinized gingiva and buccal cortical bone in patient with gingival recession

Authors:

Sizikov A.V., Grachev V.I.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2019;98(2): 22‑26

DOI: 10.17116/stomat20199802122

Read: 2149 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Sizikov AV, Grachev VI. Comparison of clinical and radiological features of keratinized gingiva and buccal cortical bone in patient with gingival recession. Stomatology. 2019;98(2):22‑26. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20199802122

Подписка 2026 Стоматология (Stomatology)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Esthetic evaluation of gingival recession plastic surgery in patients using collagen matrices. Stomatology. 2025;(4):57-61

Modern aspects of one-stage dental implantation in the aesthetic zone of the upper jaw with alveolar bone atrophy. Stomatology. 2025;(4):112-115

A comparative analysis of surgical methods to eliminate gingival recession and jaw bone atrophy in patients after orthodontic treatment. Stomatology. 2026;(1):68-74

Orthodontic treatment as an iatrogenic factor in the occurrence of gingival recession. Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2026;(1):26-29

Abstract:

Aim: Compare clinical and radiological features of keratinized gingiva and buccal cortical bone of identical corresponding contralateral teeth with recession (recession group) or without recession (control group). A total of 60 teeth from 27 patient were observed. The thickness of gingiva was significant reduced in recession group (0.85 mm, range 0.7—0.95 mm) that in control group (0,95 mm, range 0.8—1.0 mm), p<0.05. In recession and control group the height of keratinized gingiva was 1.58 mm (range 0.9—1.9 mm) and 3.0 mm (range 2—3.4 mm), correspondingly (p<0,05). The mean distance from cementoenamel junction to buccal cortical bone was strongly different in recession and control group (5,8 mm vs 4,47 mm, p<0.05).

Keywords:

gingival recession

keratinized gingiva

buccal cortical bone

Authors:

Sizikov A.V.

Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery, Moscow, Russia

Grachev V.I.

Close metadata

References:

Wolf HF. Parodontologie. M.: MEDpress inform; 2008. (In Russ.)
Kim DM, Neiva R. Periodontal Soft Tissue Non-Root Coverage Procedures: A Systematic Review From the AAP Regeneration Workshop. Journal of Periodontology. 2015;86:2:56-72.
Gargiulo A, Wentz F, Orban B. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontol. 1961;32:261.
Dorfman HS, Kennedy JE, Bird WC. Longitudinal evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts. J Clin Periodontol. 1980;7:316-324.
Dorfman HS, Kennedy JE, Bird WC. Longitudinal evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts. A four year report. J Periodontol. 1982;53:349-352.
Ericsson I, Lindhe J. Recession in sites with inadequate width of the keratinized gingiva. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 1984;11:95-103.
Freedman AL, Green K, Salkin LM, Stein MD, Mellado JR. An 18-year longitudinal study of untreated mucogingival defects. J Periodontol. 1999;70:1174-1176.
Claffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal. J Clin Periodontol. 1986;13:654-657.
Wennström JL. Mucogingival considerations in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod. 1996;2(1):46-54.
Yared KF, Zenobio EG, Pacheco W. Periodontal status of mandibular central incisors after orthodontic proclination in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:61-66.
Aimetti M, Massei G, Morra M, Cardesi E, Romano F. Correlation between gingival phenotype and Schneiderian membrane thickness. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:1128-1132.
Cook DR, Mealey BL, Verrett RG, et al. Relationship between clinical periodontal biotype and labial plate thickness: An in vivo study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011;31:345-354.
Cuny-Houchmand M, Renaudin S, Leroul M, Planche L. Gingival biotype assessement: visual inspection relevance and maxillary versus mandibular comparison. Open Dent J. 2013;7:1-6.
De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: Transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingival. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:428-433.
Muller HP, Eger T. Gingival phenotypes in young male adults. J Clin Periodontol. 1997;24(1):65-71.
Coslet G, Vanarsdall R, Weisgold A, et al. Diagnosis and classification of delayed passive eruption of the dentogingival junction in the adult. Alpha Omegan. 1977;24-28.
Kois JC. The restorative-periodontal interface: Biologic parameters. Periodontol. 2000;1996:11:29-38.
Kois JC. New paradigms for anterior tooth preparations: Rationale and technique. Contemp Esthet Dent. 1996;2:1-9.
Zotchev VA. Criminalistic photography. Course of lectures. Part 2. Volgograd: VA MVD of Russia; 2004. (In Russ.)
Lang NP, Löe H. The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. J Periodontol. 1972;43:623-627.
Miyasato M, Crigger M, Egelberg J. Gingival condition in areas of minimal and appreciable width of keratinized gingival. Clin Periodontol. 1977;4(3):200-209.
Kennedy JE, Bird WC, Palcanis KG, Dorfman HS. A longitudinal evaluation of varying widths of attached gingival. J Clin Periodontol. 1985;12:667-675.
Kisch J, Badersten A, Egelberg J. Longitudinal observation of «unattached», mobile gingival areas. J Clin Periodontol. 1986;13:131-134.
Salkin LM, Freedman AL, Stein MD, Bassiouny MA. A longitudinal study of untreated mucogingival defects. J Periodontol. 1987;58:164-166.
Grudyanov AI. Periodontal disease. M.: Medical information agency; 2009. (In Russ.)
Agudio G, Nieri M, Rotundo R, Cortellini P, Pini Prato G. Free gingival grafts to increase keratinized tissue: A retrospective long-term evaluation (10 to 25 years) of outcomes. J Periodontol. 2008;79:587-594.
Agudio G, Nieri M, Rotundo R, Franceschi D, Cortellini P, Pini Prato GP. Periodontal conditions of sites treated with gingival-augmentation surgery compared to untreated contralateral homologous sites: A 10- to 27-year long-term study. J Periodontol. 2009;80:1399-1405.
Wennstrom JL. Lack of association between width of attached gingiva and development of soft tissue recession. A 5-year longitudinal study. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14:181-184.
Wilson RD. Marginal tissue recession in general dental practice: A preliminary study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1983;3(1):40-53.