How to write a review of literature

Vlasov V.V.

doi:https://doi.org/

References:

Rochon P.A., Bero L.A., Bay A.M. et al. Comparison of Review Articles Published in Peer-Reviewed and Throwaway Journals. JAMA 2002; 287: 21: 2853-2856.
Bero L.A., Grilli R., Grimshaw J.M. et al. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. Br Med J 1998; 317: 465-468.
Cook D.J., Greengold N.L., Ellrodt A.G., Weingarten S.R. The relationship between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 210-216.
Oxman A.D., Fretheim A., Schunemann H.J. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: introduction. Health Res Policy Syst 2006; 4: 12.
Clarke M., Hopewell S., Chalmers I. Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting. Lancet 2010; 376: 9734: 20-21.
Chaudhry B., Wang J., Wu S. et al. Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 10 :742-752.
Cook D.J., Mulrow C.D., Haynes R.B. Sistematicheskie obzory: sintez naibolee obosnovannykh faktov, vazhnykh dlya prinyatiya klinicheskikh reshenii. Mezhdunar zhurn med praktiki 1997; 4: 7-11.
Light R.J., Pillemer D.B. Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press 1964; 1919.
Sterne J.A.C., Egger M., Smith G.D. Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. Br Med J 2001; 323: 7304: 101-105.
Ogilvie D., Hamilton V., Egan M., Petticrew M. Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go? J Epidemiol Commun Health 2005; 59: 9: 804-808.
von Elm E. and Scherer R. Do Clinical Trials Get Published After Presentation at Biomedical Meetings? A Systematic Review of Follow-up Studies. 2005. Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication. JAMA 2005.
Shojania K.G., Sampson M., Ansari M.T. et al. How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 4: 224-233.
Roundtree A.K., Kallen M.A., Lopez-Olivo M.A. et al. Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 2: 128-137.
Olsen O., Gotzsche P.C. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 2001; 358: 9290: 1340-1342.
von Elm E., Poglia G., Walder B., Tramer M.R. Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews. JAMA 2004; 291: 8: 974-980.
Chalmers I. Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak. Br Med J 2006; 333: 7568: 594-596.
Alderson P., Roberts I. Should journals publish systematic reviews that find no evidence to guide practice? Examples from injury research. Br Med J 2000; 320: 376-377.
Ioannidis J.P.A., Mulrow C.D., Goodman S.N. Adverse Events: The More You Search, the More You Find. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 4: 298-300.
Kyzas P.A., Loizou K.T., Ioannidis J.P.A. Selective Reporting Biases in Cancer Prognostic Factor Studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 14: 1043-1055.
Kirkham J.J., Dwan K.M., Altman D.G. et al. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. Br Med J 2010; 340: 15: 365.
Bekkering G.E., Rutjes A.W., Vlasov V.V. et al. The Effectiveness and Safety of Proton Radiation Therapy for Indications of the Eye: A Systematic Review. Strahlenther Onkol 2009; 185: 4: 211-221.
MacLehose R.R., Reeves B.C., Harvey I.M. et al. A systematic review of comparisons of effect size derived from randomized and non-randomized studies. Health Technol Ass 2000; 4: 34: 1-156.
Norris S.L., Atkins D. Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 1112-1119.
Clarke M.J. Ovarian ablation in breast cancer, 1896 to 1998: milestones along hierarchy of evidence from case report to Cochrane review. Br Med J 1998; 317: 1246-1248.
Mallett S., Deeks J.J., Halligan S. et al. Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting. Br Med J 2006; 333: 7565: 413.
Gotzsche P.C., Hrobjartsson A., Maric K., Tendal B. Data Extraction Errors in Meta-analyses That Use Standardized Mean Differences. JAMA 2007; 298: 4: 430-437.
Egger M., Smith G.D. Meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies. Br Med J 1998; 316: 7124: 61-66.
Felson D.T. Bias in meta-analytic research. J Clin Epid 1992; 45: 8: 885-892.
Smith G.D., Egger M. Metaanalysis: Unresolved issues and future developments. Br Med J 1998; 316: 7126: 221-225.
Glasziou P.P., Sanders S.L. Investigating causes of heterogeneity in systematic reviews. Stat Med 2002; 21: 11: 1503-1511.
Lau J., Ioannidis J.P.A., Schmid C.H. Meta-analysis: Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough. Lancet 1998; 351: 123-127.
Ioannidis J.P.A., Patsopoulos N.A., Rothstein H.R. Reasons or excuses for avoiding metaanalysis in forest plots. Br Med J 2008; 336: 7658: 1413-1415.
Plavinskii S.L. Biostatistika: planirovanie, obrabotka i predstavlenie rezul'tatov biomeditsinskikh issledovanii pri pomoshchi sistemy SAS. St-Peterburg: SPbMAPO 2005; 55.
Lexchin J., Bero L.A., Djulbegovic B., Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. Br Med J 2003; 326: 7400: 1167-1170.
Potshuma W.F.M., Westendorp R.G.J., Vandenbroucke J.P. Cardioprotective effect of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: is the evidence biased? Br Med J 1994; 308: 6939: 1268-1269.
Hemminki E., McPherson K. Impact of postmenopausal hormone therapy on cardiovascular events and cancer: pooled data from clinical trials. Br Med J 1997; 315: 7101: 149-153.