The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Piskunov D.P.

Federal State budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University», St. Petersburg, Russia

Danilova L.A.

Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Peterson A.I.

Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Pushkin A.S.

St. Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia;
St.-Petersburg Multi-field Hospital #2, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Rukavishnikova S.A.

St. Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia;
St.-Petersburg Multi-field Hospital #2, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Akhmedov T.A.

St. Petersburg City Multi-disciplinary Hospital №2

Evaluation of methods of determination of hemolized samples at the preanalytical stage of laboratory studies in the performance of biochemical analysis of human blood

Authors:

Piskunov D.P., Danilova L.A., Peterson A.I., Pushkin A.S., Rukavishnikova S.A., Akhmedov T.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Laboratory Service. 2018;7(4): 11‑18

Read: 8077 times


To cite this article:

Piskunov DP, Danilova LA, Peterson AI, Pushkin AS, Rukavishnikova SA, Akhmedov TA. Evaluation of methods of determination of hemolized samples at the preanalytical stage of laboratory studies in the performance of biochemical analysis of human blood. Laboratory Service. 2018;7(4):11‑18. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/labs2018704111

References:

  1. GOST R 53079.4-2008. Tekhnologii laboratornye klinicheskie. Obespechenie kachestva klinicheskikh laboratornykh issledovanii. Chast’ 4. Pravila vedeniya preanaliticheskogo etapa. (In Russ.) http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200072566
  2. Lippi G, Chance J, Church S, Dazzi P, Fontana R, Giavarina D, Grankvist K, Huisman W, Kouri T, Palicka V, Plebani M, Puro V, Salvagno G, Sandberg S, Sikaris K, Watson I, Stankovic A, Simundic A. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2011;49(7):1113-1126. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.600
  3. Lippi G, Blanckaert N, Bonini P, Green S, Kitchen S, Palicka V, Vassaul, A, Plebani M. Haemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2008;46(6):764-772. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2008.170
  4. Factors Affecting Haemolysis [document]. Accessed Feb. 19, 2018. http://www.specimencare.com/resource.aspx?IDX=3519
  5. Glick M, Ryder K, Glick S, Woods J. Unreliable Visual Estimation of the Incidence and Amount of Turbidity, Hemolysis, and Icterus in Serum from Hospitalized Patients. Clinical chemistry. 1989;35(5):837-839.
  6. Sample interference indices, Saline Protocol: H, I, and L. Abbott laboÂratories. Abbott Park, Illinois. 2007.
  7. Six Sigma – TutorialsPoint [document] Accessed Feb. 19, 2018 https://www.tutorialspoint.com/six_sigma/six_sigma_tutorial.pdf
  8. Jon Choppin. Total quality people — a fifth conversation. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal. 1995;5(2):10-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604529510083521
  9. Lippi G, Salvagno L, Montagnana G, Brocco M, Cesare Guidi G. Influence of hemolysis on routine clinical chemistry testing. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2006;44(3):311-316. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2006.054
  10. Lippi G, Cadamuro J, von Meyer A, Simundic A. Local quality assurance of serum or plasma (HIL) indices. Clinical Biochemistry. 2018;54:112-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.02.018
  11. Lippi G, Cadamuro J, von Meyer A, Simundic A. Practical recommendations for managing hemolyzed samples in clinical chemistry testing. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2018;56(5):718-727. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-1104
  12. Lippi G. Systematic Assessment of the Hemolysis Index: Pros and Cons. Systematic Assessment of the Hemolysis Index: Pros and Cons. Advances in Clinical Chemistry. 2015;(71):157-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acc.2015.05.002

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.