The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Theodorsson E.

Department of Clinical Chemistry &

Magnusson B.

Department of Clinical & ,ExperimentalMedicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Leito I.

SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Borås, Sweden ,Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Estonia

Bias in clinical chemistry

Authors:

Theodorsson E., Magnusson B., Leito I.

More about the authors

Journal: Laboratory Service. 2018;7(3): 41‑58

DOI: 10.17116/labs2018703141

Views: 1964

Downloaded: 62

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

BIAS IN CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
BIAS IN CLINICAL CHEMISTRY

To cite this article:

Theodorsson E, Magnusson B, Leito I. Bias in clinical chemistry. Laboratory Service. 2018;7(3):41‑58. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/labs2018703141

 
Подписка 2025-2 (Laboratory Service)
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata

Keywords:

clinical chemistry
clinically important bias
secondary adjustment
clinical chemistry
clinically important bias
secondary adjustment

Authors:

Theodorsson E.

Department of Clinical Chemistry &

Magnusson B.

Department of Clinical & ,ExperimentalMedicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Leito I.

SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Borås, Sweden ,Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Estonia

List of references:

  1. EP09-A3 Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline. 3rd ed. PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2013.
  2. Kallner A, Khorovskaya L, Pettersson T. A method to estimate the uncertainty of measurements in a conglomerate of instruments/laboratories. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2005;65(7):551-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365510500206567
  3. JCGM. Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, 2008. www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/ JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf.
  4. Westgard JO, Carey RN, Wold S. Criteria for judging precision and accuracy in method development and evaluation. Clin Chem. 1974;20(7):825-833.
  5. Richtlinie der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung laboratoriumsmedizinischer Untersuchungen. Bundesärztekammer, Berlin, Germany; 2013.
  6. Barwick V, Prichard E. Terminology in Analytical Measurement — Introduction to VIM 3; 2011. www.eurachem.org
  7. JCGM. International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms. 3rd ed; 2012. www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/ JCGM_200_2012.pdf
  8. Greenberg N. Update on current concepts and meanings in laboratory medicine — Standardization, traceability and harmonization. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;432:49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2013.12.045
  9. Thompson M. Towards a unified model of errors in analytical measurement. Analyst. 2000;125:2020-2025. https://doi.org/10.1039/b006376m
  10. ISO 17511:2003 In vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices — Measurement Of Quantities In Biological Samples – Metrological Traceability Of Values Assigned To Calibrators And Control Materials. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2003.
  11. EU. Directive 98/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices; 1998. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31998L0079:EN:NOT
  12. Panteghini M. Traceability as a unique tool to improve standardization in laboratory medicine. Clin Biochem. 2009;42(4-5):236-240.
  13. Infusino I, Frusciante E, Ferrero CA, Panteghini M. Commutability of two JCTLM-listed secondary reference materials for two commercial lithium assays. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;414:152-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2012.09.001
  14. Siekmann L. Establishing measurement traceability in clinical chemistry. Accred Qual Assur. 2004;9(1-2):5-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0718-5
  15. Siekmann L. Implementation of the concept of traceability in laboratory medicine in external quality assessment. Clin Biochem. 2009;42(4-5):293-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.09.014
  16. Siekmann L. Metrological traceability — a concept for standardization in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(5):953-957. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2012-0710
  17. Panteghini M. Application of traceability concepts to analytical quality control may reconcile total error with uncertainty of measurement. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(1):7-10. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2010.020
  18. Tate JR, Johnson R, Barth J, Panteghini M. Harmonization of laboratory testing — Current achievements and future strategies. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;432:4-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2013.08.021
  19. Müller MM. Tracebility in laboratory medicine. Accred Qual Assur. 2003;8:340-345.
  20. Miller WG, Myers GL, Lou Gantzer M, et al. Roadmap for harmonization of clinical laboratory measurement procedures. Clin Chem. 2011;57(8):1108-1117. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2011.164012
  21. Miller WG, Tate JR, Barth JH, Jones GR. Harmonization: The Sample, the Measurement, and the Report. Ann Lab Med. 2014;34(3):187-197. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2014.34.3.187
  22. Weykamp C, Eckfeldt J, Vesper H, et al. Toolbox of technical procedures to be considered when developing a process to achieve harmonization for a measurand; 2013. www.harmonization.net/Resource/Documents/Tool_ Box_2013.pdf
  23. Alvarez-Prieto M, Jiménez-Chacón J, Montero-Curbelo Á. Do we need to consider metrological meanings of different measurement uncertainty estimations? Accred Qual Assur. 2009;14:623-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-009-0570-3
  24. Thienpont LM. Accuracy in clinical chemistry — Who will kiss Sleeping Beauty awake? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(9):1220-1222. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2008.245
  25. Rao CR, Kleffe J. Estimation of Variance Components and Applications. Elsevier Science Publications, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 1988.
  26. Cox DR, Solomon PJ. Components of Variance. FL, USA: CRC Press Inc.; 2003.
  27. Searle SR, Casella G, Mccullogh CE. Variance Components. NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1992.
  28. Galen RS, Gambino SR. Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses. NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1975.
  29. Knottnerus JA, Buntinx F. The Evidence Base of Clinical Diagnosis: Theory and Methods of Diagnostic Research. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2008.
  30. Krzanowski WJ, Hand DJ. ROC Curves for Continuous Data. FL, USA: CRC Press Inc.; 2009.
  31. Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F, et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59(7):491-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365519950185229
  32. Fraser CG. Interpretation of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific; 1986.
  33. Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, et al. Desirable specifications for total error, imprecision, and bias, derived from intra- and inter-individual biologic variation; 2014. www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm
  34. Petersen PH, Jorgensen LG, Brandslund I, De Fine Olivarius N, Stahl M. Consequences of bias and imprecision in measurements of glucose and hba1c for the diagnosis and prognosis of diabetes mellitus. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2005;240:51-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365510500236135
  35. Petersen PH, de Verdier CH, Groth T, Fraser CG, Blaabjerg O, Horder M. The influence of analytical bias on diagnostic misclassifications. Clin Chim Acta. 1997;260(2):189-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-8981(96)06496-0
  36. Theodorsson E. Validation and verification of measurement methods in clinical chemistry. Bioanalysis. 2012;4(3):305-320. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio.11.311
  37. Becker D, Christensen R, Currie L, et al. Use of NIST standard reference materials for decisions on performance of analytical chemical methods and laboratories; 1992. www.nist.gov/mml/csd/inorganic/upload/NIST_ SpecialPub829.pdf
  38. Natrella MG. Experimental Statistics. NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1984.
  39. Kallner A. Laboratory Statistics: Handbook of Formulas and Terms. 1st ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2013.
  40. Magnusson B, Ellison SL. Treatment of uncorrected measurement bias in uncertainty estimation for chemical measurements. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;390(1):201-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1693-1
  41. Magnusson B, Leito I. Personal communication, draft leaflet from EuraChem. Measurement uncertainty and traceability working group; 2014. www.eurachem.org
  42. Mcnaught AD, Wilkinson A. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry: Compendium of chemical terminology: IUPAC recommendations. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science; 1997.
  43. Dietzen DJ, Queen SF, Solomon SS. Matrix-dependent bias in total thyroxine measurement on the Beckman Access. Clin Chim Acta. 2002;316(1-2):171-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-8981(01)00723-9
  44. Sobas F, Benattar N, Bellisario A, et al. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2010;21(5):498-501. https://doi.org/10.1097/mbc.0b013e328338dbd3
  45. Unsal I, Coskun A, Serteser M, Inal TC, Ozpinar A. Toward standardization of quality assessment in laboratory medicine by using the same matrix samples for both internal and external quality assessments. Accred Qual Assur. 2010;15:621-627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0694-5
  46. Zegers I, Beetham R, Keller T, et al. The importance of commutability of reference materials used as calibrators: the example of ceruloplasmin. Clin Chem. 2013;59(9):1322-1329. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.201954
  47. Miller WG, Myers GL. Commutability still matters. Clin Chem. 2013;59(9):1291-1293. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2013.208785
  48. White GH. Metrological traceability in clinical biochemistry. Ann Clin Biochem. 2011;48(5):393-409. https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2011.011079
  49. Vesper HW, Miller WG, Myers GL. Reference materials and commutability. Clin Biochem Rev. 2007;28(4):139-147.
  50. Miller WG, Myers GL, Rej R. Why commutability matters. Clin Chem. 2006;52(4):553-554. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.063511
  51. Franzini C, Ceriotti F. Impact of reference materials on accuracy in clinical chemistry. Clin Biochem. 1998;31(6):449-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9120(98)00054-x
  52. Franzini C. Commutability of reference materials in clinical chemistry. J Int Fed Clin Chem. 1993;5(4):169-173.
  53. Vesper HW, Thienpont LM. Traceability in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem. 2009;55(6):1067-1075.
  54. Thienpont LM, Van Nuwenborg JE, Stockl D. Intrinsic and routine quality of serum total potassium measurement as investigated by split-sample measurement with an ion chromatography candidate reference method. Clin Chem. 1998;44(4):849-857.
  55. Solvik UO, Stavelin A, Christensen NG, Sandberg S. External quality assessment of prothrombin time: the split-sample model compared with external quality assessment with commercial control material. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2006;66(4):337-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365510701376433
  56. Stavelin A, Petersen PH, Solvik UO, Sandberg S. External quality assessment of point-of-care methods: model for combined assessment of method bias and single-participant performance by the use of native patient samples and noncommutable control materials. Clin Chem. 2013;59(2):363-371. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.191957
  57. Dybkaer R. From total allowable error via metrological traceability to uncertainty of measurement of the unbiased result. Accred Qual Assur. 1999;4(9-10):401-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27093-0_7
  58. Kuttatharmmakul S, Massart DL, Smeyers-Verbeke J. Comparison of alternative measurement methods: Determination of the minimal number of measurements required for the evaluation of the bias by means of interval hypothesis testing. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2000;52(1):61-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7439(00)00079-4
  59. Levey S, Jennings ER. The use of control charts in the clinical laboratory. Am J Clin Pathol. 1950;20:1059-1066.
  60. Henry RJ, Seaglove M. The running of standards in clinical chemistry and the use of the control chart. J Clin Pathol. 1952;5:305-311.
  61. Maroto A, Riu J, Boque R, Rius FX. Estimating uncertainties of analytical results using information from the validation process. Anal Chim Acta. 1999;391(2):173-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-2670(99)00111-7
  62. Committee AM. Uncertainty of measurement: Implications of its use in analytical science. Analyst. 1995;120:2303-2305. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9952002303
  63. Barwick VJ, Ellison SLR. Estimating measurement uncertainty using a cause and effect and reconciliation approach. Part 2. Measurement uncertainty estimates compared with collaborative trial expectation. Anal Commun. 1998;35(11):377-383. https://doi.org/10.1039/a806576d
  64. Ellison SL. ISO uncertainty and collaborative trial data. Accred Qual Assur. 1998;3:95-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050197
  65. Ellison SL, Barwick VJ. Estimating measurement uncertainty: Reconciliation using a cause and effect approach. Accred Qual Assur. 1998;3(3):101-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05173-3_21
  66. Barwick VJ, Ellison SL, Rafferty MJQ, Gill RS. The evaluation of measurement uncertainty from method validation studies. Part 2: The practical application of a laboratory protocol. Accred Qual Assur. 2000;5:104-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05173-3_33
  67. Ellison SLR, Williams A. Eurachem/CITAC Guide Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement. 3rd ed; 2012. www.eurachem.org/index.php/publications/guides/quam
  68. O´Donnell GE, Hibbert DB. Reply to «comment»:do we really need to account for run bias when producing analytical results with stated uncertainty? Analyst. 2005;132(12):1272-1274. https://doi.org/10.1039/b711403f
  69. O’Donnell GE, Hibbert DB. Treatment of bias in estimating measurement uncertainty. Analyst. 2005;130(5):721-729. https://doi.org/10.1039/b414843f
  70. Hibbert DB. Systematic errors in analytical measurement results. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1158(1-2):25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.021
  71. Kadis R. Do we really need to account for run bias when producing analytical results with stated uncertainty? Comment on ‘Treatment of bias in estimating measurement uncertainty.’Eds. O’Donnell GE, Hibbert DB. Analyst. 2007;132(12):1272-1274; discussion 1275-1277. https://doi.org/10.1039/b703615a
  72. Synek V. Attempts to include uncorrected bias in the measurement uncertainty. Talanta. 2005;65(4):829-837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.07.038
  73. Phillips SD, Eberhardt KR. Guidelines for expressing the uncertainty of measurement results containing uncorrected bias. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 1997;102(5):577-585. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.102.039
  74. Hasselbarth W. Accounting for bias in measurement uncertainty estimation. Accred Qual Assur. 2004;9:509-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-004-0782-5
  75. Hasselbarth W. Measurement uncertainty procedures revisited: direct determination of uncertainty and bias handling. Accred Qual Assur. 1998;3:418-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050277
  76. Rozet E, Marini RD, Ziemons E et al. Total error and uncertainty: Friends or foes? Trends Anal Chem. 2011;30(5):797-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2010.12.009
  77. Ellison SLR, Farrant TJ, Barwick V. Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain): Practical statistics for the analytical scientist: a bench guide. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: RSC Publishing; 2009.
  78. Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Total analytic error. From concept to application; 2013. www.aacc.org/publications/cln/2013/september/Pages/Total-Analytic-Error.aspx#
  79. Westgard JO. The meaning and application of total error; 2007. www.westgard.com/essay111.htm?format=phocapdf
  80. Krouwer JS. Multi-factor designs IV. How multi-factor designs improve the estimate of total error by accounting for protocol-specific biases. Clin Chem. 1991;37:26-29.
  81. Krouwer JS. Estimating total analytical error and its sources. Techniques to improve method evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;116(7):726-731.
  82. Krouwer JS. How to improve total error modeling by accounting for error sources beyond imprecision and bias. Accred Qual Assur. 2001;47(7):1329-1330.
  83. Krouwer JS. Setting performance goals and evaluating total analytical error for diagnostic assays. Clin Chem. 2002:48(6):919-927.
  84. Krouwer JS. Simulating total error while excluding results underestimates total error. Clin Chem. 2010;56(9):1505-1506; author reply 1506. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2010.151936
  85. Krouwer JS, Astles JR, Cooper WG et al. Estimation of Total Analytical Error for Clinical Laboratory Methods; Approved Guideline, EP21-A. PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2003.
  86. Bauersfeld W. RiliBAK — a new computation concept. Clin Lab. 2006;52(11-12):689-694.
  87. Recommendations for clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988 (CLIA) waiver applications for manufacturers of in vitro diagnostic devices. MD, USA: US Food and Drug Administration; 2008.
  88. Phillipov G, Phillips PJ. Components of total measurement error for hemoglobin A(1c) determination. Clin Chem. 2001;47(10):1851-1853.

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.