Efficacy of serosomyotomy in esophagogastroplasty

Mariyko V.A.; Dorofeev D.A.; Petnyunas A.S.; Tretyakov V.O.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2018331-36

Mariyko V.A.

Chair of Surgical diseases №2, Medical Institute of Tula State University, Tula, Russia

Dorofeev D.A.

Chair of Surgical diseases №2, Medical Institute of Tula State University, Tula, Russia

Petnyunas A.S.

Chair of Surgical diseases №2, Medical Institute of Tula State University, Tula, Russia

Tretyakov V.O.

Department of Surgical Diseases №2 of Medical Institute of Tula State University, Tula, Russia

Efficacy of serosomyotomy in esophagogastroplasty

Authors:

Mariyko V.A., Dorofeev D.A., Petnyunas A.S., Tretyakov V.O.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(3): 31‑36

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2018331-36

Read: 873 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Mariyko VA, Dorofeev DA, Petnyunas AS, Tretyakov VO. Efficacy of serosomyotomy in esophagogastroplasty. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(3):31‑36. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2018331-36

Подписка 2026 Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Abstract:

Aim. To evaluate an effectiveness of serosomyotomy in isoperistaltic esophagogastroplasty. Material and methods. Our analysis shows that serosomyotomy improves the results of isoperistaltic esophagogastroplasty. Results. Esophagogastrostomy by using of proximal graft with adequate blood supply reduced the risk of anastomosis failure. The incidence of this complication was 12.2% (n=6) and 3% (n=1) in control and main groups respectively.

Keywords:

efficacy of serosomyotomy

esophagogastroplasty

Authors:

Mariyko V.A.

Chair of Surgical diseases №2, Medical Institute of Tula State University, Tula, Russia

Dorofeev D.A.

Chair of Surgical diseases №2, Medical Institute of Tula State University, Tula, Russia

Petnyunas A.S.

Chair of Surgical diseases №2, Medical Institute of Tula State University, Tula, Russia

Tretyakov V.O.

Department of Surgical Diseases №2 of Medical Institute of Tula State University, Tula, Russia

Close metadata

References:

Davydov MI, Stilidi IS. Rak pishhevoda. M.: Izdatel’skaja gruppa RONC; Prakticheskaja medicina; 2007. (In Russ.)
Krupatkin AI, Siborov VV. Lazernaja dopplerovskaja floumetrija mikrocirkuljacii krovi. M.: Medicina; 2005. (In Russ.)
Marijko VA, Dorofeev DA, Nechaj VS, Petnjunas AS. Lazernaja dopplerovskaja floumetrija pri jezofagogastroplastike. Hirurgija. 2015;9:63-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2015963-67
Miroshnikov BI, Gorbunov TN, Ivanov AD. Plastika pishhevoda. SPb: JeLBI; 2012. (In Russ.)
Sigal MZ, Sigal ZM. Intraorgannaja gemodinamika v polyh organah pri operacijah v brjushnoj polosti. Kazan’: Izdatel’stvo Kazanskogo Universiteta; 1980. (In Russ.)
Chernousov AF, Bogopol’skij DM, Kurbanov FS. Hirurgija pishhevoda. Rukovodstvo dlja vrachej. M.: Medicina; 2000. (In Russ.)
Chernjavskij AV, Lavrov NA. Hirurgija raka zheludka i pishhevodno-zheludochnogo perehoda. Nizhnij Novgorod: DEKOM; 2008. (In Russ.)
Luketich JD, Ariun Pennathur, Omar Awais, at al. Nason; Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esopragectomy. Review of Over 1000 Pabients. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):95-103.