The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 101-59-87
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2024
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Alekberzade A.V.

Kafedra khirurgii Pervogo moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova

Krylov N.N.

Klinika fakul'tetskoĭ khirurgii #1 lechebnogo fakul'teta Pervogo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova

Rustamov É.A.

Nauchnyĭ tsentr khirurgii im. akad. M.A. Topchibasheva, Baku, Respublika Azerbaĭdzhan

Badalov D.A.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Popovtsev M.A.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Perforated peptic ulcer closure: laparoscopic or open?

Authors:

Alekberzade A.V., Krylov N.N., Rustamov É.A., Badalov D.A., Popovtsev M.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2017;(2): 45‑50

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2017245-50

Views: 1912

Downloaded: 67

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

To cite this article:

Alekberzade AV, Krylov NN, Rustamov ÉA, Badalov DA, Popovtsev MA. Perforated peptic ulcer closure: laparoscopic or open?. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2017;(2):45‑50. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2017245-50

Подписка 2025 (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Mediasphera_Net
Close metadata

Aim. To compare laparoscopic and open closure of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU). Material and methods. The study included 153 patients who underwent PPU suturing. 78 patients underwent laparoscopic closure (laparoscopic group) and open suturing via upper midline laparotomy was performed in 75 cases (open group). Surgery time, postoperative pain severity, time of analgesics intake, postoperative complications, hospital-stay and and cosmetic effect were compared. Results. Laparoscopic PPU closure may be effective and accessible in experienced endoscopic surgeon. It significantly reduces postoperative pain severity, need for analgesics, incidence of postoperative complications and provides excellent cosmetic effect. However, there is greater time of surgery compared with open intervention. There were no significant differences in hspital-stay between groups. Conclusion. Laparoscopic PPU suturing can be considered a good alternative to open surgery. Further researches are needed for standardization, assessment of safety, real advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic technique.

Keywords:

perforated peptic ulcer
laparoscopic technique

Authors:

Alekberzade A.V.

Kafedra khirurgii Pervogo moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova

Krylov N.N.

Klinika fakul'tetskoĭ khirurgii #1 lechebnogo fakul'teta Pervogo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova

Rustamov É.A.

Nauchnyĭ tsentr khirurgii im. akad. M.A. Topchibasheva, Baku, Respublika Azerbaĭdzhan

Badalov D.A.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Popovtsev M.A.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

List of references:

  1. Malfertheiner P, Chan FK, McColl KE. Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet. 2009;374(9699):1449-1461. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60938-7
  2. Quenot JP, Thiery N, Barbar S. When should stress ulcer prophylaxis be used in the ICU? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15(2):139-143. doi:10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832978e0
  3. Yeomans ND. Overview of 50 years’ progress in upper gastrointestinal diseases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24(3):2-4. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06064.x
  4. Svanes C. Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis. World J Surg. 2000;24:277-283. doi:10.1007/s002689910045
  5. Møller MH, Adamsen S, Wojdemann M, Møller AM. Perforated peptic ulcer: how to improve outcome? Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(1):15-22. doi:10.1080/00365520802307997
  6. Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Review of History and Treatment. Dig Surg. 2010;27(3):161-169. doi:10.1159/000264653
  7. Seelig MH, Seelig SK, Behr C et al. Comparison between open and laparoscopic technique in the management of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;3:226-229. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12960721
  8. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Management strategies, early results, benefits and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. World J Surg. 2005;29:1299-1310. doi:10.1007/s00268-005-7705-4
  9. Lau H. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1013-1021. doi:10.1007/s00464-003-8266-y
  10. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;390:413-420. doi:10.1007/s00423-005-0569-0
  11. Krylov N, Vinnichuk D. Perforativnaya yazva: patomorfoz, kollizii i trendy. Vrach. 2012;1:15-20. (In Russ.).
  12. Köhler L. Endoscopic surgery: what has passed the test? World J Surg. 1999;23:816-824. doi:10.1007/s002689900585
  13. Sanabria AE, Morales CH, Villegas MI. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005(4):CD004778. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004778.pub2
  14. Mouret P, Francois Y, Vignal J et al. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 1990;77:1006. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800770916
  15. Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH et al. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or suture less technique. Ann Surg. 1996;224:131-138. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1235333/
  16. Siu WT, Chau CH, Law BKB et al. Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:481-484. doi:10.1002/bjs.4452
  17. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Comparison of laparoscopic vs open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(12):1565-1571. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0146-1
  18. Bertleff MJ, Halm JA, Bemelman WA et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial. World J Surg. 2009;33(7):1368-1373. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0054-y
  19. Kattabekov OA, Rizaev KS, Atadzhanov ShK. Sravnitel'naya harakteristika neposredstvennyh rezul'tatov tradicionnogo i laparoskopicheskogo ushivaniya perforativnyh duodenal'nyh yazv. Annaly hirurgii. 2009;3:32-36. (In Russ.).
  20. Izbasarov RZh. Laparoskopicheskoe ushivanie perforativnyh gastroduodenal'nyh yazv. Endoskopicheskaya hirurgiya. 2013;19(2):15-17. (In Russ.).
  21. Sazhin IV, Sazhin VP, Bronshtejn PG i dr. Laparoskopicheskoe lechenie perforativnyh yazv. Hirurgiya. 2014;7:12-16. (In Russ.).
  22. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O`Morain C et al. Management of Helicobacter Pylori infection — Maastricht IV/Florence Consensus Report. Gut. 2012;61:646-664. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302084
  23. Pimanov SI, Leya M, Makarenko EV. Rekomendacii konsensusa Maastriht-4 po diagnostike i lecheniyu helikobakternoj infekcii: obsuzhdenie na Evropejskoj gastroenterologicheskoj nedele. Consilium medicum. 2012;8(14):11-21. (In Russ.).
  24. Sarosi GA, Jaiswal KR, Nwariaku FE et al. Surgical therapy of peptic ulcers in the 21st century: more common than you think. Am J Surg. 2005;190:775-779. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.019
  25. Sauerland S, Agresta F, Bergamaschi R et al. Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:14-29. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0564-0
  26. Thorsen K, Glomsaker TB, von Meer A et al. Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(8):1329-1335. doi:10.1007/s11605-011-1482-1
  27. Kirshtein B, Bayme M, Mayer T et al. Laparoscopic treatment of gastroduodenal perforations. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1487-1490. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-2237-9
  28. Siu WT, Leong HT, Bonita KB et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2002;235:313-319. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1422436/
  29. Bertleff MJOE, Liem RSB, Bartels HL et al. The Stamp method: a new treatment for perforated peptic ulcer? Surg Endosc. 2006;20:791-793. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-2157-8
  30. Schein M, Gecelter G, Freinkel W et al. Peritoneal lavage in abdominal sepsis. A con-trolled clinical study. Arch Surg. 1990;125:1132-1135. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410210058008

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register


We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.