The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Belov Yu.V.

RNTsKh im. akad. B.V. Petrovskogo RAMN

Katkov A.I.

Klinika aortal'noĭ i serdechno-sosudistoĭ khirurgii GBOU VPO Pervyĭ MGMU im. I.M. Sechenova Minzdrava Rossii

Salagaev G.I.

Chair of Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventional Cardiology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (head — MD R.N. Komarov), acad. B.V. Petrovsky Russian Research Center for Surgery (director — acad. of RAS Yu.V. Belov), Moscow, Russia

Aortic valve replacement: effective orifice area as a predictor of surgical treatment results

Authors:

Belov Yu.V., Katkov A.I., Salagaev G.I.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2014;(9): 72‑76

Read: 1775 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

To cite this article:

Belov YuV, Katkov AI, Salagaev GI. Aortic valve replacement: effective orifice area as a predictor of surgical treatment results. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2014;(9):72‑76. (In Russ.)

Подписка 2026 Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Abstract:

Authors:

Belov Yu.V.

RNTsKh im. akad. B.V. Petrovskogo RAMN

Katkov A.I.

Klinika aortal'noĭ i serdechno-sosudistoĭ khirurgii GBOU VPO Pervyĭ MGMU im. I.M. Sechenova Minzdrava Rossii

Salagaev G.I.

Chair of Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventional Cardiology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (head — MD R.N. Komarov), acad. B.V. Petrovsky Russian Research Center for Surgery (director — acad. of RAS Yu.V. Belov), Moscow, Russia

Close metadata

References:

  1. Bokeriya L.А., Podzolkov V.P., Аli KHassan i dr. Protezirovanie klapanov serdtsa v sochetanii s odnomomentnoj korrektsiej slozhnykh vrozhdennykh porokov serdtsa. Materialy DesyatogoVserossijskogo s"ezda serdechno-sosudistykh khirurgov. M 2004; 9 [Prosthetic heart valves in conjunction with simultaneous correction complex congenital heart defects. Proceedings of the Tenth All-Russian Congress of Cardiovascular Surgeons]. (in Russian)
  2. Verbovaya T.А. Razrabotka, tekhnika implantatsii i klinicheskoe primenenie otechestvennykh mekhanicheskikh protezov klapanov serdtsa [Development, implantation technique and clinical application of domestic mechanical heart valve prostheses]: Аvtoref. dis. ... kand. med. nauk. SPb 2009; 24. (in Russian)
  3. Gavrilenkov V.I., Kuznetsov A.A., Perlej V.E. i dr. EHkhokardiograficheskaya otsenka normal'noj biomekhaniki aortal'nogo klapana. Ul'trazvukovaya i funktsional'naya diagnostika 2003 [Echocardiographic evaluation of the normal biomechanics of the aortic valve. Ultrasound and functional diagnostics]; 2: 89-92. (in Russian)
  4. Ivanov V.А., Evseev E.P. Protezirovanie aortal'nogo klapana u vzroslykh patsientov s "uzkim" kornem aorty [Aortic valve replacement in adult patients with a "narrow" aortic root]. KHirurgiya 2005; 10:12-18. (in Russian)
  5. Konstantinov O.V. Rezul'taty rasshireniya kornya aorty po metodu Manouguian Seybold-Epting u patsientov s vrozhdennymi porokami aortal'nogo klapana [The results of aortic root expansion by method of Manouguian Seybold-Epting in patients with congenital aortic valve]: Аvtoref. dis. ... kand. med. nauk. M 2005; 29. (in Russian)
  6. Podzolkov V.P., Аli KHassan, Konstantinov O.V., Fatullyaev Z.F. KHirurgicheskoe lechenie vrozhdennykh porokov aortal'nogo klapana s "uzkim" fibroznym kol'tsom: rezul'taty primeneniya tekhniki Manouguian u 57 patsientov. M 2005 [Surgical treatment of congenital aortic valve with a "narrow" fibrous ring: the results of applying the Manouguian's technique in 57 patients]. (in Russian)
  7. Aikawa E. Calcific Aortic Valve Disease. Circ Res 2011; Chapter 14: 437-438.
  8. Aortic Valve Baypass for the High-Risk Patient With Aortic Stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 1605-1610.
  9. Apostolakis E., Baikoussis N.G., Papakonstantinou N.A., Goudevenos J. Patient-prosthesis mismatch and strategies to prevent it during aortic valve replacement. Hellenic J Cardiol 2011; 52: 41-51.
  10. Bach D.S., Goldbach M., Sakwa M.P., Petracek M., Erret L., Mohr F. S.J.M. Regent Study Group. Hemodynamics and early performance of the St. Jude Medical Regent aortic valve prosthesis. J Heartvalve Dis 2001; 10: 436-442.
  11. Bach D.S., Radeva J.I., Birnbaum H.G., Fournier A.A., Tuttle E.G. Prevalence, referral patterns, testing, and surgery in aortic valve disease: leaving women and elderly patients behind? J Heart Valve Dis 2007; 16: 362-369.
  12. Baldwin J.T., Campbell A., Luck C. et al. Fluid dynamics of the CarboMedics Kinetic bileaflet prosthetic heart valve. Eur J of Cardiothorac Surg 1997; 11: 287-292.
  13. Barner H.B., Labovitz A.J., Fiore A.C. Prosthetic valves for the small aortic root. J Card Surg 1994; 9: 2 Suppl: 154-157.
  14. Beholz S., Repossini A., Livi U., Schepens M., Gabry M., Matschke K. The Freedom Solo valve for aortic valve replacement: clinical and hemodynamic results from prospective multicenter trial. J Heart Valve Disease 2013; 146: 96-102.
  15. Binet J.P., Duran C.G., Carpenter A., Langlois J. Heterologous aortic valve transplantation. Lancet 1965; 2: 1275.
  16. Blackstone E.H., Cosgrove D.M., Jamieson W.R.E. et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 783-796.
  17. Blais C., Dumesnil J.G., Baillot R. et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003; 108: 983-988.
  18. Castro L.J., Arcidi J.M., Fisher A.L., Gaudiani V.A. Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 31-36; discussion 36.
  19. David T.E., Pollick C., Bos J. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 99: 113-118.
  20. Del Rizzo D.F., Abdoh A., Cartier P. et al. Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 11: 114-120.
  21. Del Rizzo D.F., Goldman B.S., Joyner C.P., Sever J., Fremes S.E., Christakis G.T. Initial clinical experience with the Torontostentless porcine valve. J Cardiac Surg 1994; 9: 379-385.
  22. Bonderman D., Graf A., Kammerlander A.A., Kocher A., Laufer G., Lang I.M., Mascherbauer J. Factors Determining Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement - A Prospective Cohort Study December 2013; 8: 12.
  23. Dumesnil J.G., LeBlanc M.H., Cartier P.C. et al. Hemodynamic features of the freestyle aortic bioprosthesis compared with stented bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 130-133.
  24. Hanayama N., Christakis G.T., Mallidi H.R. et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch israre after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 1822-1829.
  25. Head S.J., Mokhles M.M., Osnabrugge R.L., Pibarot P., Mack M.J. et al. The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 1518-1529.
  26. Howell N.J., Keogh B.E., Barnet V. et al. Patient-prosthesismismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30: 10-14.
  27. Jin X.Y., Pepper J.R. Do stentless valves make a difference? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 22: 95-100.
  28. Kallis P., Sneddon J.F., Simpson I.A., Fung A., Pepper J.R., Smith E.E. Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards supraannular aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 54: 1182-1185.
  29. Kappetein A.P., Braun J., Baur L.H. et al. Outcome and followup of aortic valve replacement with the freestyle stentlessbioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 601-607.
  30. Kobayashi Y., Fukushima Y., Hayase T., Kojima K., Endo G. Clinical outcome of aortic valve replacement with 16-mm ATSadvanced performance valve for small aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 1195-1199.
  31. Kohsaka S., Mohan S., Virani S. et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects long-term survival after mechanical valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135: 1076-1080.
  32. Kon N.D., Westaby S., Amarasena N., Pillai R., Cordell A.R. Comparison of implantation techniques using freestyle stentless porcine aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 857-862.
  33. Kunadian B., Vijayalakshmi K., Thornley A.R. et al. Meta-analysis of valve hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression for stentless versus stented aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 73-78.
  34. Luciani G.B., Casali G., Auriemma S., Santini F., Mazzucco A. Survivalafterstentlessandstentedxenograftaorticvalvereplacement: aconcurrent, controlledtrial. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 1443-1449.
  35. Medalion B., Blackstone E.H., Lytle B.W., White J., Arnold J.H., Cosgrove D.M. Aortic valve replacement: is valve size important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119: 963-974.
  36. Milano A.D., De Carlo M., Mecozzi G, et al. Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses: comparison at long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 37-43.
  37. Mohty D., Dumesnil J.G., Echahidi N. et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 39-47.
  38. Mohty D., Mohty-Echahidi D., Malouf J.F. et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 2006; 113: 420-426.
  39. Moon M.R., Lawton J.S., Moazami N., Munfakh N.A., Pasque M.K., Damiano R.J.Jr. POINT: Prosthesis-patient mismatch does not affect survival for patients greater than 70 years of age undergoing bioprostheticaorticvalve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 278-283.
  40. Nathaniel S., Saligram S., Innasimuthu A.L. Aortic stenosis: An update. World J Cardiol 2010; 2: 135-139.
  41. Nishimura R.A., Pieroni D.R., Bierman F.Z. et al. Second natural history study of congenital heart defects. Aortic stenosis: echocardiography. Circulation 1993; 87: 2 Suppl: 166-172.
  42. O'Brien M.F., McGiffin D.C., Stafford E.G. et al. Allograft aorticvalve replacement: long-term comparative clinical analysis of the viable cryopreserved and antibiotic 4°C stored valves. J Card Surg 1991; 6: 534-543.
  43. Pathophysiology of Aortic Stenosis and Approach to Treatment With Percutaneous Valve Implantation. C. Spaccarotella, A. Mongiardo, Ciro Indolfi. Circulation Journal Official Journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. Circ J 2010; 75: 1: 11-19.
  44. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. Jam Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1131-1141.
  45. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart 2006; 92: 1022-1029.
  46. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J., Lemieux M. et al. Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Hemodynamic and Symptomatic Status, Morbidity and Mortality after Aortic Valve Replacement with a Bioprosthetic Heart Valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7: 2: 211-218.
  47. Rahimtoola S.H. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 1978; 58: 20-24.
  48. Rao V., Jamieson W.R., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., David T.E. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valvereplacement. Circulation 2000; 102: 19 Suppl 3: 1115-1119.
  49. Roedler S., Moritz A., Wutte M., Hoda R., Wolner E. The Carbo Medics "top hat" supraannular prosthesis in the small aortic root. J Card Surg 1995; 10: 198-204.
  50. Ross D. Homograftreplacementoftheaorticvalve. Br J Surg 1967; 54: 842-843.
  51. Ruel M., Al-Faleh H., Kulik A., Chan K.L., Mesana T.G., Burwash I.G. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131: 1036-1044.
  52. Ruel M., Rubens F.D., Masters R.G. et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 149-159.
  53. Kitamura T., Torii S., Hanayama N., Oka N., Tomoyasu T., Irisawa Y., Shibata M., Hayashi H., Inoue T., Miyaji K. Moderare Prosthesis - Patient Mismatch May be Negligible in Elderly Patients Undergoing Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis. Int Heart J 2013; 54: 11-14.
  54. Tasca G., Brunelli F., Cirillo M. et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 505-510.
  55. Tasca G., Mhagna Z., Perotti S. et al. Impact of prosthesis-patientmismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality afteraortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation 2006; 113: 570-576.
  56. Thourani V.H., Ailawadi G., Szeto W.Y., Dewey T.M., Gayton R.A., Mack M.J. et al. Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients: amultiinstitutional study. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91: 49-56.
  57. Vicchio M., Della Corte A., De Santo L.S., De Feo M., Caianiello G., Scardone M. et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in the elderly: Survival, ventricular mass regression, and quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86: 1791-1797.
  58. Walther T., Falk V., Langebartels G. et al. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stentless versus conventional biological aortic valves: impact on early regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 1999; 100: 19 Suppl: 110-116.
  59. Walther T., Rastan A., Falk V. et al. Patient prosthesis mismatchaffects short- and long-term outcomes after aorticvalve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30: 15-19.
  60. Yap C.H., Mohajeri M., Yii M. Prosthesis-patient mismatch is associated with higher operative mortality following aortic valve replacement. Heart Lung Circ 2007; 16: 260-264.
  61. Yun K.L., Sintek C.F., Fletcher A.D. et al. Aortic valve replacement with the Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis: five-year experience. Circulation 1999; 100: 19 Suppl: 1117-1123.
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.