Emergency surgery: the troubleshooting board session. Pyatigorsk, 2011

Close metadata

Authors represent the surgical technique of colectomy with preserving the natural intestinal passage in the treatment of the familial colic adenomatosis. The technique is based on the preserving the distal part of the rectum with its demucosation and connecting with the ileal conduit. The rectal mucosa reconstruction is performed with the use of allogenic transplantation of fetal intestinal cells. 27 patients were operated on. The rectal mucosa reconstruction was registered in all cases range 4-12 weeks postoperatively. The long-term follow-up showed no disease recurrence within 5 years. The method demonstrated better intermediate and long-term functional results.

List of references:

Baratsis S., Manganas D., Germanos S. et al. Total Colectomy with mucosectomy and Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Annals of Gastroenterology 2007; 16: 4: 54-58.
Björk J., Akerbrant H., Iselius L.Sh. Outcome of primary and secondary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 984-992.
Burdyński R., Banasiewicz T., Marciniak R. et al. Intestinal Pouch Complications in Patients Who Underwent Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in 1985-2008. Polish Journal of Surgery 2011; 83: 3: 161-170.
Campos F.G., Oliva P.R., Rocco I.A. et al. Surgical treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis: ileoretal anastomosis or restorative proctolectomy? Arquivos de gastroenterologia 2009; 46: 4: 12: 294-299.
Choi R.S., Reiqler M., Pothoulakis C. et al. Studies of brush border enzymes, basement membrane components, and electrophysiology of tissue-engineered neointestine. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33: 991-997.
Church J., Burke C., McGannon E. et al. Risk of Rectal Cancer in Patients After Colectomy and Ileorectal Anastomosis for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 9: 1175-1181.
Fazio V.W., Ziv Y., Church J.M. et al. Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomoses. Complications and Function in 1 005 Patients. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 2: 120-127.
Ganschow P., Pfeiffer U., Hinz U. et al. Quality of Life Ten and More Years After Restorative Proctocolectomy for Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Coli. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 10: 53: 1381-1387.
Grikscheit T.C., Vacanti J.P. Tissue-engineered stomach from autologous and syngeneic tissue. J Surg Res 2002; 107: 277-288.
Guilherme C.F., Oliva P.R., Rocco I.A. et al. Evaluating Causes of Death in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. J gastrointestinal surgery 2010; 14: 12: 1943-1949.
Günther K., Braunrieder G., Bittorf B.R. et al. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis experience better bowel function and quality of life after ileorectal anastomosis than after ileoanal pouch. Colorectal disease 2003; 5: 1: 2: 38-44.
Kartheuser A.H., Parc R., Penna Ch.P. et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as the first choice operation in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: A ten-year experience. Surgery 1996; 119: Issue 6: 615-623.
McMullen K., Hicks T.C., Ray J.E. et al. Complications associated with heal pouch-anal anastomosis. World journal of surgery 1991; 15: 6: 763-766.
Moussata D., Nancey S., Lapalus M.G. et al. Frequency and severity of ileal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis after colectomy. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 2: 120-125.
Parc Y., Piquard A., Dozois R. R. et al. Long-term Outcome of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patients After Restorative Coloproctectomy. Annals of Surgery 2004; 239: Issue 3: 378-382.
Remzi F.H., Fazio V.W., Delaney C.P. et al. Dysplasia of the Anal Transitional Zone After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Results of Prospective Evaluation After a Minimum of Ten Years. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 46: 1: 6-13.
Roon A.C., Tekkis P.P., Clark S.K. et al. The Impact of Technical Factors on Outcome of Restorative Proctocolectomy for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Dis Solon Rectum 2007; 50: 7: 952-961.
Slors J.F.M., Ponson A.E., Taat C.W. et al. Risk of residual rectal mucosa after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal reconstruction with the double-stapling technique. Postoperative endoscopic follow-up study. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 38: 2: 207-210.
Van Duijvendijk P., Slors J.F., Taat C.W. et al. Functional outcome after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis compared with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 5: 648-654.
Vasen H.F., van Duijvendijk P., Buskens E. et al. Decision analysis in the surgical treatment of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a Dutch-Scandinavian collaborative study including 659 patients. Gut 2001; 49: 231-235

Close metadata