doi:https://doi.org/

References:

ElBardissi A.W., Aranki S.F., Sheng S., et al. Trends in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:273—281.
Gaudino M., Taggart D., Suma H., et al. The choice of conduits in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:1729—1737.
Collins P., Webb C.M., Chong C.F., Moat N.E. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation 2008;117:2859—2864.
Nasso G., Coppola R., Bonifazi R., et al. Arterial revascularization in primary coronary artery bypass grafting: direct comparison of 4 strategies — results of the Stand-in-Y Mammary Study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:1093—1100.
Song S.-W., Sul S.-Y., Lee H.-J., Yoo K.-J. Comparison of the radial artery and saphenous vein as composite grafts in off- pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. Korean Circ J 2012;42:107—112.
Buxton B.F., Raman J.S., Ruengsakulrach P., et al. Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five-year interim results of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1363—1371.
Petrovic I., Nezic D., Peric M., et al. Radial artery vs saphenous vein graft used as the second conduit for surgical myocardial revascularization: long-term clinical follow-up. J Cardiothorac Surg 2015;10:127.
Deb S., Cohen E.A., Singh S.K., et al. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:28—35.
Gaudino M., Tondi P., Benedetto U., et al. Radial artery as a coronary artery bypass conduit: 20-year results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:603—610.
Hillis L.D., Smith P.K., Anderson J.L., et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2011;124(13):e652—e735.
Windecker S., Kolh P., Alfonso F., et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014;35:2541—2619.
Aldea G.S., Bakaeen F.G., Pal J., et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines on arterial conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:801—809.
Gaudino M., Di Franco A., Rahouma M., et al. Unmeasured confounders in observational studies comparing bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7(1):e008010.
Loop F.D., Lytle B.W., Cosgrove D.M., et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1—6.
Garcia S., Sandoval Y., Roukoz H., et al. Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1421—1431.
Lopes R.D., Mehta R.H., Hafley G.E., et al. Relationship between vein graft failure and subsequent clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2012;125:749—756.
Shavadia J., Norris C.M., Graham M.M., et al. Symptomatic graft failure and impact on clinical outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: results from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry. Am Heart J 2015;169:833—840.