The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Bakarev M.A.

Institute of Molecular Pathology and Morphopathology, Novosibirsk, Russia

Levin V.P.

Altai State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russia, Barnaul, Russia

Kachesov I.V.

Novosibirsk state regional clinical hospital, Novosibirsk, Russia

Neĭmark A.I.

kafedra urologii i nefrologii Altaĭskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta, Barnaul

Morphological changes in tumor and nontumor tissue in the treatment of prostate adenocarcinoma with high-intensity focused ultrasound in combination with androgen deprivation

Authors:

Bakarev M.A., Levin V.P., Kachesov I.V., Neĭmark A.I.

More about the authors

Read: 2677 times


To cite this article:

Bakarev MA, Levin VP, Kachesov IV, Neĭmark AI. Morphological changes in tumor and nontumor tissue in the treatment of prostate adenocarcinoma with high-intensity focused ultrasound in combination with androgen deprivation. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology. 2018;80(3):26‑33. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/patol201880326-33

Recommended articles:
Epidemiology and prevention of prostate cancer. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(7):111-118
Adhe­rence to breast cancer treatment: posi­tions of patient and doctor. Medi­cal Technologies. Asse­ssment and Choice. 2025;(4):74-83

References:

  1. Merabishvili VM, Petrova NG, Atroshchenko AV, Kharitonov MV. Epidemiology of prostate cancer (cohort study). Voprosy onkologii. 2014;60(4):457-463. (In Russ.)
  2. Chaussy CG, Thüroff S. High-Intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of prostate cancer: a review. J Endourol. 2017; 31(Suppl.1):S30-S37. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0548
  3. Warmuth M, Johansson T, Mad P. Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focussed ultrasound for the primary and salvage treatment of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2010;58(6):803-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.009
  4. Popkov VM, Fomkin RN, Blyumberg BI. Prognostic factors in the estimation of HIFU treatment efficiency in patients with localized prostate cancer. Saratovskii nauchno-meditsinskii zhurnal. 2013;9(1):116-121. (In Russ.)
  5. Fomkin RN, Voronina ES, Popkov VM, Maslyakova GN, Blyumberg BI. Pathomorphism of prostate cancer during high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment. Onkourologiya. 2013;(1):55-61. (In Russ.)
  6. Biermann K, Montironi R, Lopez-Beltran A, Zhang S, Cheng L. Histopathological findings after treatment of prostate cancer using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Prostate. 2010;70(11): 1196-1200. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.21154
  7. Ryan P, Finelli A, Lawrentschuk N, Fleshner N, Sweet J, Cheung C, van der Kwast T, Evans A. Prostatic needle biopsies following primary high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: histopathological features in tumour and non-tumour tissue. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65(8):729-734. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200460
  8. Petraki CD, Sfikas CP. Histopathological changes induced by therapies in the benign prostate and prostate adenocarcinoma. Histol Histopathol. 2007;22:107-118. https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-22.107
  9. Lavnikova GA. Nekotorye zakonomernosti luchevogo patomorfoza opukholei cheloveka i ikh prakticheskoe ispol’zovanie. Vestnik Akademii meditsinskikh nauk SSSR. 1976;6:13-19. (In Russ.)
  10. Kweldam CF, Wildhagen MF, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, van der Kwast TH, van Leenders GJ. Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. Mod Pathol. 2015;28(3):457-464. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2014.116
  11. Dema A, Tăban S, Lazăr E, Borda A, Lăzureanu C, Herman D, Mureşan A, Cornianu M, Anderco D, Loghin A. Pseudobenign prostate carcinomas: causes of false-negative biopsy results. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2011;52(3,Suppl.):963-974.
  12. Zhao J, Epstein JI. High-grade foamy gland prostatic adenocarcinoma on biopsy or transurethral resection: a morphologic study of 55 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(4):583-590. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0b013e31818a5c6c
  13. O’Brien C, True LD, Higano CS, Rademacher BLS, Garzotto M, Beer TM. Histological changes associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are predictive of nodal metastases in high-risk prostate cancer patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133(4):654-661. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCP8EL5FTZSOBIH
  14. Wu F, Chen WZ, Bai J, Zou JZ, Wang ZL, Zhu H, Wang ZB. Tumor vessel destruction resulting from high-intensity focused ultrasound in patients with solid malignancies. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28(4):535-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-5629(01)00515-4
  15. Miyata Y, Mitsunari K, Asai A, Takehara K, Mochizuki Y, Sakai H. Pathological significance and prognostic role of microvessel density, evaluated using CD31, CD34, and CD105 in prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy with neoadjuvant therapy. Prostate. 2015;75(1):84-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.22894

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.