Total nasal defect reconstruction with nasal prosthesis. Two case reports

Veselova K.A.

Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry Research Institute of Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Antonova I.N.

Russian Periodontal Association;
First Saint Petersburg state University named after I.P. Pavlov

Gromova N.V.

Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry Research Institute of Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Total nasal defect reconstruction with nasal prosthesis. Two case reports

Authors:

Veselova K.A., Antonova I.N., Gromova N.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2021;100(4): 98‑103

DOI: 10.17116/stomat202110004198

Downloaded: 44

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Veselova KA, Antonova IN, Gromova NV. Total nasal defect reconstruction with nasal prosthesis. Two case reports. Stomatology. 2021;100(4):98‑103. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202110004198

Close metadata

Total nasal defects after injures or surgical interventions can negatively affect patient’s quality of life. Maxillofacial prosthesis is a contemporarily and reliable solution. This method gives us opportunity to restore missing tissues and helps patients to overcome social and psychological difficulties. In this article we demonstrated advantages and disadvantages of the method in two clinical cases. The application of magnetic and adhesive retention in different cases is described. Also, we outlined clinical and technological steps of maxillofacial prosthesis manufacture. Modified procedure of impression obtaining is offered.

Keywords:

nasal prosthesis

maxillofacial prostheses

facial prosthesis

total nasal defect

facial impression

Authors:

Veselova K.A.

Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry Research Institute of Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Antonova I.N.

Russian Periodontal Association;
First Saint Petersburg state University named after I.P. Pavlov

Gromova N.V.

Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry Research Institute of Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Received:

18.06.2020

Accepted:

13.11.2020

List of references:

Minjaeva VA. Cheljustno-licevoe protezirovanie. SPb.: Polimedikor; 2008. (In Russ.).
Cheng MH. Nasal Reconstruction. In: Cheng MH, Chang KP, Kao HK, eds. Resection and Reconstruction of Head & Neck Cancers. Singapore: Springer; 2019.
Wolff K, Hölzle F. Raising Of Microvascular Flaps. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018.
Toso S, Menzel K, Motzkus Y. Anaplastology in times of facial transplantation: Still a reasonable treatment option? J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 43(7):1049-1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.05.005
Zaoui K, Jung A, Rückschloß T, Möhlenbruch M, Plinkert P, Federspil P. Measurement of bone thickness at the site of titanium miniplates used to retain nasal prostheses in fused computed tomographic data. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;58(5):546-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.02.009
Thomas K. The Art Of Clinical Anaplastology. [England]: S. Thomas; 2006.
Brown K. Fabrication of a nose prosthesis. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 1971;26(5): 543-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90015-1
Taylor T. Clinical Maxillofacial Prosthetics. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2000.
Ariani N, Visser A, Teulings M. Efficacy of cleansing agents in killing microorganisms in mixed species biofilms present on silicone facial prostheses — an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investigat. 2015;19(9):2285-2293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1453-0

Close metadata