Is transradial access optimal for any endovascular intervention?

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Results of surgical treatment in patients with critical ischemia of the lower limbs and complications of endovascular interventions. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2017;(1):47-50

Psychopharmacotherapy of mental disorders in hematological patients: security concerns. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2023;(4-2):90-98

Practical recommendations for managing hemolyzed samples in clinical chemistry testing. Laboratory Service. 2023;(1):40-49

Effect of food intake on pharmacokinetic profile of the new original drug «Respoxyton» in healthy volunteers. Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice. 2023;(2):81-88

Laser fluorescence spectroscopy in surgical treatment of intramedullary tumors: experience of the Burdenko Neurosurgery Center. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2023;(5):21-27

Long-term contraception with combined hormonal drugs until menopause. Benefits and risks. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2023;(5):102-110

Laser fluorescence spectroscopy and navigation in surgical treatment of spinal tumors: a systematic review. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2024;(1):109-114

Localized scleroderma: etiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, difficulties of diagnosis and therapy. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2024;(1):12-18

Short-term outcomes of mechanical and hand-sewn laparoscopic one-anastomosis mini-gastric bypass. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(4):29-37

The review is devoted to analysis of distal transradial access in endovascular surgery. Certain difference was obtained between traditional transradial and distal transradial approaches, i.e. lower incidence complications and higher intra- and postoperative for patients and surgeons.

Keywords:

endovascular surgery

distal transradial approach

anatomical snuffbox

safety

comfort

short-term immobilization

Authors:

Ya.A. Khudyakov

Vorokhobov Moscow City Clinical Hospital No. 67

ORCID: 0000-0003-1415-226X

R.N. Komarov

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0002-3904-6415

D.N. Samochatov

Vorokhobov Moscow City Clinical Hospital No. 67

ORCID: 0000-0002-5230-2006

Received:

25.03.2022

Accepted:

06.04.2022

List of references:

Bajaj A, Pancholy S, Sothwal A, et al. Transradial versus Transfemoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left Main coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019;20(9):790-798.
Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions across the entire spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(14):1419-1434.
Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. ESC/ EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2018;40:87-165.
Aoun J, Hattar L, Dgayli K, Wong G, Bhat T. Update on complications and their management during Transradial cardiac catheterization. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2019;17(10):741-751.
Fernandez R, Zaky F, Ekmejian A, Curtis E, Lee A. Safety and efficacy of ulnar artery approach for percutaneous cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91(7):1273-1280.
Babunashvili A, Dundua D. Recanalization and reuse of early occluded radial artery within 6 days after previous transradial diagnostic procedure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;77(4):530-536.
Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention. 2017;13(7):851-857.
Soydan E, Akın M. Coronary angiography using the left distal radial approach — An alternative site to conventional radial coronary angiography. Anatol J Cardiol. 2018;19(4):243-248.
Valsecchi O, Vassileva A, Cereda AF, et al. Early clinical experience with right and left distal Transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox in 52 consecutive patients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018;30(6):218-223.
Kim Y, Ahn Y, Kim I, et al. Feasibility of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via left snuffbox approach. Korean Circ J. 2018;48(12):1120-1130.
Lee JW, Park SW, Son JW, Ahn SG, Lee SH. Real-world experience of the left distal transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective observational study (LeDRA). EuroIntervention. 2018;14(9):995-1003.
Ziakas A, Koutouzis M, Didagelos M, et al. Right arm distal transradial (snuffbox) access for coronary catheterization: initial experience. Hell J Cardiol. 2018; S1109-9666(18):30379-8.
Babunashvili A. Novel distal transradial approach for coronary and peripheral interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(13 Suppl):B323.
Al-Azizi KM, Grewal V, Gobeil K, et al. The left distal Transradial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention: a US experience. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019;20(9):786-789.
Flores EA. Making the right move: use of the distal radial artery access in the hand for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions. Cath Lab Digest. 2018;26(12):16-25.
Mizuguchi Y, Izumikawa T, Hashimoto S, et al. Efficacy and safety of the distal transradial approach in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Japanese multicenter experience. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020;35(2):162-167.
Norimatsu K, Kusumoto T, Yoshimoto K, et al. Importance of measurement of the diameter of the distal radial artery in a distal radial approach from the anatomical snuffbox before coronary catheterization. Heart Vessel. 2019;34(10):1615-1620.
Wretowski D, Krakowian M, Łabyk A, Pruszczyk P, Roik M. Very distal transradial approach (VITRO) for coronary interventions. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2019;15(1):42-45.
Gasparini GL, Garbo R, Gagnor A, Oreglia J, Mazzarotto P. First prospective multicentre experience with left distal transradial approach for coronary chronic total occlusion interventions using a 7 Fr Glidesheath slender. EuroIntervention. 2019;15(1):126-128.
Uddin MJ, Hashem S, Momen A, et al. Right distal radial artery access for coronary intervention initial experience in Bangladesh. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(15 Suppl):S72.
Amin MR, Banerjee SK, Biswas E, et al. Feasibility and safety of distal Transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography and intervention. Mymensingh Med J. 2019;28(3): 647-654.
Yu W, Hu P, Wang S, et al. Distal radial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography and intervention: a single center experience. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(3):e18330.
Kaledin A, Kochanov IN, Podmetin PS, et al. Distal radial artery in endovascular interventions. Endovascular Sur. 2017;2:125-133.
Coughlan JJ, Zebrauskaite A, Arnous S, Kiernan TJ. Left distal trans-radial access facilitates earlier discharge post-coronary angiography. J Interv Cardiol. 2018;31(6):964-968.
Roghani-Dehkordi F, Hashemifard O, Sadeghi M, Mansouri R, Akbarzadeh M, Dehghani A, Akbari M. Distal accesses in the hand (two novel techniques) for percutaneous coronary angiography and intervention. ARYA Atheroscler. 2018;14(2):95-100.
Koutouzis M, Kontopodis E, Tassopoulos A, et al. Distal versus traditional radial approach for coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019;20(8):678-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2018.09.018
Gajurel RM, Sahi R, Shrestha H, Thapa S, Khanal R. Initial experience on anatomical snuff box approach for Coronary Angiogram & Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a tertiary care center Nepal. World J Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;8:578-587.
Aoi S, Htun WW, Freeo S, et al. Distal transradial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography as an alternative access site for faster hemostasis. 2019;94(5):651-657. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28155
El Tahaan M, Hamid AE, Ismael AE, Abd El Samad A. Immediate Outcomes of Trans Radial Approach versus Anatomical Snuff Box Access for Coronary Procedures. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2019;76(5):4099-4105.
Mori S, Ito Y, Kishida T, et al. A comparison of feasibility and safety using transradial versus distal transradial approach in patients undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC. 2019;73(9):1259 Poster.
Vefalı V, Sarıçam E. The comparison of traditional radial access and novel distal radial access for cardiac catheterization. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019;S1553-8389(19):30378-1.
Davies RE, Gilchrist IC. Back hand approach to radial access: The snuff box approach. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018;19(3 Pt B):324-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2017.08.014
Sgueglia G. A., Giorgio A. D., Gaspardone A., Babunashvili A. Anatomic Basis and Physiological Rationale of Distal Radial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary and Endovascular Procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(20):2113-2119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.045
Hadjivassiliou A, Kiemeneij F, Nathan S, Klass D. Ultrasound-guided access of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuffbox for catheter-based vascular interventions: A technical guide. EuroIntervention. 2021;16:1342-1348. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00555
Skraqi E, Kis M, Akin M. Endothelial functions are preserved in left distal radial access coronary angiography, a prospective comparison with right and left forearm radial artery access site. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(Suppl 1):ehy566.P6371.
Moriyama S, Tagaito S, Mizuguchi Y, Yamada T, Taniguchi N, Nakajima S, Hata T, Takahashi A. Impact of the Distal Radial Artery Approach for Diagnostic Coronary Catheterization in Nursing Service. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(13 B778-B778 TCT-794.
Prejean SP, Von Mering G, Ahmed M. Successful treatment of Pseudoaneurysm following left distal Transradial cardiac catheterization with compression device. J Vasc Ultrasound. 2019;43(2):81-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1544316719844061
McCarthy DJ, Chen SH, Brunet MC, Shah S, Peterson E, Starke RM. Distal radial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox for Neurointerventions: case report. World Neurosurg. 2019;122:355-359. Epub 2018 Nov 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.030
Al Saiegh F, Mouchtouris N, Sweid A, et al. Placement of the woven EndoBridge (WEB) device via distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox: a technical note. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;69:261-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.018
Brunet MC, Chen SH, Sur S, et al. Distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for diagnostic cerebral angiography. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11(7):710-713. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014718
Nardai S, Végh E, Óriás V, Nemes B, Tóth J, Hüttl A, Hüttl K, Avantadil B, Bertrand OF, Merkely B, Ruzsa Z. Feasibility of distal radial access for carotid interventions: the RADCAR-DISTAL pilot study. EuroIntervention. 2019;pii: EIJ-D-19-00023. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00023
Patel P, Majmundar N, Bach I, Dodson V, Al-Mufti F, Tomycz L, Khandelwal P. Distal Transradial access in the anatomic snuffbox for diagnostic cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(9):1526-1528. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6178
Srinivasan VM, Cotton PC, Burkhardt JK, Johnson JN, Kan P. Distal access catheters for coaxial radial access for posterior circulation interventions. World Neurosurg. 2021;149:1001-1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.048
Ruzsa Z, Csavajda Á, Nemes B, Deák M, Sótonyi P, Bertrand OF, Merkely B. Distal radial artery access for superficial femoral artery interventions. J Endovasc Ther. 2021;28(2):255-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602820963022
Watanabe S, Usui M. Distal transradial artery access for vascular access intervention. J Vasc Access. 2020;1129729820974235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729820974235
Park SE, Cho SB, Baek HJ, Moon JI, Ryu KH, Ha JY, Lee S, Won J, Ahn JH, Kim R, Choi SY. Clinical experience with distal transradial access for endovascular treatment of various noncoronary interventions in a multicenter study. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237798. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237798
Sherev DA, Shaw RE, Brent BN. Angiographic predictors of femoral access site complications: implication for planned percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;65(2):196-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20354
Chandrasekar B, Doucet S, Bilodeau L, Crepeau J, deGuise P, Gregoire J, et al. Complications of cardiac catheterization in the current era: a single-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;52(3):289-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1067
Samal AK, White CJ. Percutaneous management of access site complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002;57(1):12-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10179
Piper WD, Malenka DJ, Ryan TJ Jr., Shubrooks SJ Jr, O’Connor GT, Robb JF, et al. Predicting vascular complications in percutaneous coronary interventions. Am Heart J. 2003;145(6):1022-1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00079-6
Yatskar L, Selzer F, Feit F, Cohen HA, Jacobs AK, Williams DO, et al. Access site hematoma requiring blood transfusion predicts mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: data from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69(7):961-966. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21087
Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2465-2476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6
Posham R, Biederman DM, Patel RS, Kim E, Tabori NE, Nowakowski FS, et al. Transradial Approach for Noncoronary Interventions: A Single-Center Review of Safety and Feasibility in the First 1,500 Cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(2):159-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.10.026
Authors/Task Force m, Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(37):2541-2619. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278
Mason PJ, Shah B, Tamis-Holland JE, Bittl JA, Cohen MG, Safirstein J, et al. An Update on Radial Artery Access and Best Practices for Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(9):e000035. https://doi.org/10.1161/HCV.0000000000000035
Hahalis G, Aznaouridis K, Tsigkas G, Davlouros P, Xanthopoulou I, Koutsogiannis N, et al. Radial Artery and Ulnar Artery Occlusions Following Coronary Procedures and the Impact of Anticoagulation: ARTEMIS (Radial and Ulnar ARTEry Occlusion Meta-AnalysIS) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(8):e005430.
Sheikh AR, Abdelaal E, Sastry S, Karim S, Zeb M. Novel Distal Left Radial Artery Access in Anatomical Snuffbox for Recanalization of Proximal Radial Artery Total Occlusion and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through Left Internal Mammary Artery. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(7):e006579. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006579
Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989;16(1):3-7.

Close metadata