V.A. Solodkiy
Russian Research Center of Radiology
S.V. Goncharov
Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology
O.A. Vlasov
Federal State Budgetary Institution «Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology» Ministry of Health of Russia
Yu.A. Barsukov
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Preliminary comparison of results of transanal endoscopic surgery and standard surgical procedures in patients with rectal cancer
Journal: P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2023;12(6): 12‑18
Views: 403
Downloaded: 2
To cite this article:
Solodkiy VA, Goncharov SV, Vlasov OA, Barsukov YuA. Preliminary comparison of results of transanal endoscopic surgery and standard surgical procedures in patients with rectal cancer. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology.
2023;12(6):12‑18. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog20231206112
To evaluate the efficacy of transanal endoscopic surgeries (TES) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in rectal cancer (RC) compared to standard surgeries (SS).
The study included 299 RC patients with tumor stage T1-3N0-1M0. Of these, 36 patients (Group 1) underwent TES, and 263 patients (Group 2) had SS. Some patients received NAT: a course of external beam radiation therapy at a dose of 46—60 Gy combined with capecitabine at a dose of 2 g/m2 (in two doses) daily during the radiation therapy course and subsequent courses of consolidating polychemotherapy in the XELOX regimen. Pseudo-randomization was performed for group comparability: patients without regional metastases with comparable invasion depth and nearly identical regression coefficients in terms of tumor size and volume were selected from Group 2 into Group 3. After pseudo-randomization, there were 72 patients left: 36 after TES (Group 1) and 36 after SS (Group 3).
In Group 1, progression was detected in 3 (8.3%) out of 36 patients, while in Group 3, among 36 patients, 6 (16.7%) showed progression (p=0.2851). The overall 5-year survival rate in Group 1 was 78.5%, and in Group 3, it was 83% (p=0.51282). Progression-free survival in Group 1 was 76%, and in Group 3, it was 77% (p=0.40086). NAT was administered to 27 (75.0%) of 36 patients in Group 1 and to 3 (8.3%) of 36 patients in Group 3 (p=0.00001). However, given the unfavorable prognosis in lower rectal RC, sphincter-preserving surgeries, are acceptable only after NAT, and surgical treatment is effective only for T2N0M0 stage performing abdominal-perineal resection of the rectum.
Performing TES after NAT shows progression-free survival rates comparable to standard surgeries in the context of surgical treatment. Considering the unfavorable prognosis in lower rectal RC, even after NAT, preference should be given to standard surgeries.
Keywords:
Authors:
V.A. Solodkiy
Russian Research Center of Radiology
S.V. Goncharov
Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology
O.A. Vlasov
Federal State Budgetary Institution «Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology» Ministry of Health of Russia
Yu.A. Barsukov
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Received:
21.07.2023
Accepted:
09.08.2023
List of references:
Close metadata
Email Confirmation
An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.
Email Confirmation
Log in to the site using your account in one of the services
We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.